diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch | 10 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch b/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch index db3a70e803..a0d2502d24 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch +++ b/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch @@ -10,7 +10,15 @@ Change suggested by Julian Taylor. Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757037 -Upstream-Status: Pending +RP: Patch is still in debian as of 20220524 in a revised form: +https://sources.debian.org/patches/lzo2/2.10-2/ +https://sources.debian.org/patches/lzo2/2.10-2/0001-Conditionally-replace-reinvention-of-memcpy-with-cal.patch/ +It was submitted in 2015, no reply to an email from RP in 2022 either. + +We likely need this in OE to prevent against unaligned accesses +on systems such as armv5. + +Upstream-Status: Inactive-Upstream Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> --- minilzo/minilzo.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ |