| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Move the PIXPLLC code into per-model source files and wire it up
with per-model callbacks. No functional changes.
The PIXPLLC pixel-clock is part of the CRTC, but really separate
hardware that varies with each model of the G200. Move the PIXPLLC
code for each model into the per-model source file and call it from
CRTC helpers via device functions.
This allows to remove struct mgag200_pll and the related code. The
new callbacks behave like the CRTC's atomic_check and atomic_enable
functions.
v3:
* clean up style
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220728124103.30159-12-tzimmermann@suse.de
|
|
Add a separate initializer function for each model. Add separate
devic structures for G200 and G200SE, which require additional
information.
Also move G200's and G200SE's helpers for reading the BIOS and
version id into model-specific code.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220601112522.5774-3-tzimmermann@suse.de
|
|
commit f86c3ed55920 ("drm/mgag200: Split PLL setup into compute and
update functions") introduced a regression for g200wb and g200ew.
The PLLs are not set up properly, and VGA screen stays
black, or displays "out of range" message.
MGA1064_WB_PIX_PLLC_N/M/P was mistakenly replaced with
MGA1064_PIX_PLLC_N/M/P which have different addresses.
Patch tested on a Dell T310 with g200wb
Fixes: f86c3ed55920 ("drm/mgag200: Split PLL setup into compute and update functions")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220308174321.225606-1-jfalempe@redhat.com
|
|
The variable delta is not initialized and this will cause unexpected
behaviour with the comparison of tmpdelta < delta. Fix this by setting
it to 0xffffffff. This matches the behaviour as in the similar function
mgag200_pixpll_compute_g200se_04.
v2:
* move fix up by one line to align style with other functions
* add additional tags from similar patch
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Fixes: 2545ac960364 ("drm/mgag200: Abstract pixel PLL via struct mgag200_pll")
Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar variable")
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210817163204.494166-1-colin.king@canonical.com
|
|
Move all PLL compute and update functions into mgag200_pll.c. No
functional changes to the rsp algorithms.
Introduce struct mgag200_pll and mgag200_pll_funcs. The data strutures
abstract the details of each revision's PLL. Perform calls to compute
and update functionality via function pointers. Init the PLL once as
part of the driver initialization.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210714142240.21979-11-tzimmermann@suse.de
|
Thomas Zimmermann
Jocelyn Falempe
Colin Ian King