aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2017-05-03zram: remove zram_meta structureMinchan Kim
It's redundant now. Instead, remove it and use zram structure directly. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1492052365-16169-5-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-02-24zram: extend zero pages to same element pageszhouxianrong
The idea is that without doing more calculations we extend zero pages to same element pages for zram. zero page is special case of same element page with zero element. 1. the test is done under android 7.0 2. startup too many applications circularly 3. sample the zero pages, same pages (none-zero element) and total pages in function page_zero_filled the result is listed as below: ZERO SAME TOTAL 36214 17842 598196 ZERO/TOTAL SAME/TOTAL (ZERO+SAME)/TOTAL ZERO/SAME AVERAGE 0.060631909 0.024990816 0.085622726 2.663825038 STDEV 0.00674612 0.005887625 0.009707034 2.115881328 MAX 0.069698422 0.030046087 0.094975336 7.56043956 MIN 0.03959586 0.007332205 0.056055193 1.928985507 from the above data, the benefit is about 2.5% and up to 3% of total swapout pages. The defect of the patch is that when we recovery a page from non-zero element the operations are low efficient for partial read. This patch extends zero_page to same_page so if there is any user to have monitored zero_pages, he will be surprised if the number is increased but it's not harmful, I believe. [minchan@kernel.org: do not free same element pages in zram_meta_free] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170207065741.GA2567@bbox Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1483692145-75357-1-git-send-email-zhouxianrong@huawei.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1486307804-27903-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org Signed-off-by: zhouxianrong <zhouxianrong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-02-24zram: remove waitqueue for IO doneMinchan Kim
zram_reset_device() waits for ongoing writepage pages to be completed by zram->refcount logic. However, it's pointless because before the reset, we prevent further opening of zram by zram->claim and flush all of pending IO by fsync_bdev so there should be no pending IO at the zram_reset_device(). So let's remove that code which is even broken due to the lack of wake_up elsewhere. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1485145031-11661-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-26zram: use crypto api to check alg availabilitySergey Senozhatsky
There is no way to get a string with all the crypto comp algorithms supported by the crypto comp engine, so we need to maintain our own backends list. At the same time we additionally need to use crypto_has_comp() to make sure that the user has requested a compression algorithm that is recognized by the crypto comp engine. Relying on /proc/crypto is not an options here, because it does not show not-yet-inserted compression modules. Example: modprobe zram cat /proc/crypto | grep -i lz4 modprobe lz4 cat /proc/crypto | grep -i lz4 name : lz4 driver : lz4-generic module : lz4 So the user can't tell exactly if the lz4 is really supported from /proc/crypto output, unless someone or something has loaded it. This patch also adds crypto_has_comp() to zcomp_available_show(). We store all the compression algorithms names in zcomp's `backends' array, regardless the CONFIG_CRYPTO_FOO configuration, but show only those that are also supported by crypto engine. This helps user to know the exact list of compression algorithms that can be used. Example: module lz4 is not loaded yet, but is supported by the crypto engine. /proc/crypto has no information on this module, while zram's `comp_algorithm' lists it: cat /proc/crypto | grep -i lz4 cat /sys/block/zram0/comp_algorithm [lzo] lz4 deflate lz4hc 842 We still use the `backends' array to determine if the requested compression backend is known to crypto api. This array, however, may not contain some entries, therefore as the last step we call crypto_has_comp() function which attempts to insmod the requested compression algorithm to determine if crypto api supports it. The advantage of this method is that now we permit the usage of out-of-tree crypto compression modules (implementing S/W or H/W compression). [sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com: zram-use-crypto-api-to-check-alg-availability-v3] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160604024902.11778-4-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160531122017.2878-5-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-20zram: introduce per-device debug_stat sysfs nodeSergey Senozhatsky
debug_stat sysfs is read-only and represents various debugging data that zram developers may need. This file is not meant to be used by anyone else: its content is not documented and will change any time w/o any notice. Therefore, the output of debug_stat file contains a version string. To avoid any confusion, we will increase the version number every time we modify the output. At the moment this file exports only one value -- the number of re-compressions, IOW, the number of times compression fast path has failed. This stat is temporary any will be useful in case if any per-cpu compression streams regressions will be reported. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160513230834.GB26763@bbox Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160511134553.12655-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-20zram: remove max_comp_streams internalsSergey Senozhatsky
Remove the internal part of max_comp_streams interface, since we switched to per-cpu streams. We will keep RW max_comp_streams attr around, because: a) we may (silently) switch back to idle compression streams list and don't want to disturb user space b) max_comp_streams attr must wait for the next 'lay off cycle'; we give user space 2 years to adjust before we remove/downgrade the attr, and there are already several attrs scheduled for removal in 4.11, so it's too late for max_comp_streams. This slightly change a user visible behaviour: - First, reading from max_comp_stream file now will always return the number of online CPUs. - Second, writing to max_comp_stream will not take any effect. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160503165546.25201-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-09-08zsmalloc/zram: introduce zs_pool_stats apiSergey Senozhatsky
`zs_compact_control' accounts the number of migrated objects but it has a limited lifespan -- we lose it as soon as zs_compaction() returns back to zram. It worked fine, because (a) zram had it's own counter of migrated objects and (b) only zram could trigger compaction. However, this does not work for automatic pool compaction (not issued by zram). To account objects migrated during auto-compaction (issued by the shrinker) we need to store this number in zs_pool. Define a new `struct zs_pool_stats' structure to keep zs_pool's stats there. It provides only `num_migrated', as of this writing, but it surely can be extended. A new zsmalloc zs_pool_stats() symbol exports zs_pool's stats back to caller. Use zs_pool_stats() in zram and remove `num_migrated' from zram_stats. Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-06-25zram: close race by open overridingSergey Senozhatsky
[ Original patch from Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> ] Commit ba6b17d68c8e ("zram: fix umount-reset_store-mount race condition") introduced bdev->bd_mutex to protect a race between mount and reset. At that time, we don't have dynamic zram-add/remove feature so it was okay. However, as we introduce dynamic device feature, bd_mutex became trouble. CPU 0 echo 1 > /sys/block/zram<id>/reset -> kernfs->s_active(A) -> zram:reset_store->bd_mutex(B) CPU 1 echo <id> > /sys/class/zram/zram-remove ->zram:zram_remove: bd_mutex(B) -> sysfs_remove_group -> kernfs->s_active(A) IOW, AB -> BA deadlock The reason we are holding bd_mutex for zram_remove is to prevent any incoming open /dev/zram[0-9]. Otherwise, we could remove zram others already have opened. But it causes above deadlock problem. To fix the problem, this patch overrides block_device.open and it returns -EBUSY if zram asserts he claims zram to reset so any incoming open will be failed so we don't need to hold bd_mutex for zram_remove ayn more. This patch is to prepare for zram-add/remove feature. [sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com: simplify reset_store()] Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-06-25zram: remove max_num_devices limitationSergey Senozhatsky
Limiting the number of zram devices to 32 (default max_num_devices value) is confusing, let's drop it. A user with 2TB or 4TB of RAM, for example, can request as many devices as he can handle. Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-15zram: support compactionMinchan Kim
Now that zsmalloc supports compaction, zram can use it. For the first step, this patch exports compact knob via sysfs so user can do compaction via "echo 1 > /sys/block/zram0/compact". Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com> Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com> Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com> Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12zram: remove request_queue from struct zramSergey Senozhatsky
`struct zram' contains both `struct gendisk' and `struct request_queue'. the latter can be deleted, because zram->disk carries ->queue pointer, and ->queue carries zram pointer: create_device() zram->queue->queuedata = zram zram->disk->queue = zram->queue zram->disk->private_data = zram so zram->queue is not needed, we can access all necessary data anyway. Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12zram: remove init_lock in zram_make_requestMinchan Kim
Admin could reset zram during I/O operation going on so we have used zram->init_lock as read-side lock in I/O path to prevent sudden zram meta freeing. However, the init_lock is really troublesome. We can't do call zram_meta_alloc under init_lock due to lockdep splat because zram_rw_page is one of the function under reclaim path and hold it as read_lock while other places in process context hold it as write_lock. So, we have used allocation out of the lock to avoid lockdep warn but it's not good for readability and fainally, I met another lockdep splat between init_lock and cpu_hotplug from kmem_cache_destroy during working zsmalloc compaction. :( Yes, the ideal is to remove horrible init_lock of zram in rw path. This patch removes it in rw path and instead, add atomic refcount for meta lifetime management and completion to free meta in process context. It's important to free meta in process context because some of resource destruction needs mutex lock, which could be held if we releases the resource in reclaim context so it's deadlock, again. As a bonus, we could remove init_done check in rw path because zram_meta_get will do a role for it, instead. Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Cc: Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-13mm/zram: correct ZRAM_ZERO flag bit positionMahendran Ganesh
In struct zram_table_entry, the element *value* contains obj size and obj zram flags. Bit 0 to bit (ZRAM_FLAG_SHIFT - 1) represent obj size, and bit ZRAM_FLAG_SHIFT to the highest bit of unsigned long represent obj zram_flags. So the first zram flag(ZRAM_ZERO) should be from ZRAM_FLAG_SHIFT instead of (ZRAM_FLAG_SHIFT + 1). This patch fixes this cosmetic issue. Also fix a typo, "page in now accessed" -> "page is now accessed" Signed-off-by: Mahendran Ganesh <opensource.ganesh@gmail.com> Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Acked-by: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com> Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-10-09zram: report maximum used memoryMinchan Kim
Normally, zram user could get maximum memory usage zram consumed via polling mem_used_total with sysfs in userspace. But it has a critical problem because user can miss peak memory usage during update inverval of polling. For avoiding that, user should poll it with shorter interval(ie, 0.0000000001s) with mlocking to avoid page fault delay when memory pressure is heavy. It would be troublesome. This patch adds new knob "mem_used_max" so user could see the maximum memory usage easily via reading the knob and reset it via "echo 0 > /sys/block/zram0/mem_used_max". Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Cc: <juno.choi@lge.com> Cc: <seungho1.park@lge.com> Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net> Reviewed-by: David Horner <ds2horner@gmail.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-10-09zram: zram memory size limitationMinchan Kim
Since zram has no control feature to limit memory usage, it makes hard to manage system memrory. This patch adds new knob "mem_limit" via sysfs to set up the a limit so that zram could fail allocation once it reaches the limit. In addition, user could change the limit in runtime so that he could manage the memory more dynamically. Initial state is no limit so it doesn't break old behavior. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix typo, per Sergey] Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Cc: <juno.choi@lge.com> Cc: <seungho1.park@lge.com> Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net> Cc: David Horner <ds2horner@gmail.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-08-29zram: fix incorrect stat with failed_readsChao Yu
Since we allocate a temporary buffer in zram_bvec_read to handle partial page operations in commit 924bd88d703e ("Staging: zram: allow partial page operations"), our ->failed_reads value may be incorrect as we do not increase its value when failing to allocate the temporary buffer. Let's fix this issue and correct the annotation of failed_reads. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com> Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Acked-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-08-06zram: replace global tb_lock with fine grain lockWeijie Yang
Currently, we use a rwlock tb_lock to protect concurrent access to the whole zram meta table. However, according to the actual access model, there is only a small chance for upper user to access the same table[index], so the current lock granularity is too big. The idea of optimization is to change the lock granularity from whole meta table to per table entry (table -> table[index]), so that we can protect concurrent access to the same table[index], meanwhile allow the maximum concurrency. With this in mind, several kinds of locks which could be used as a per-entry lock were tested and compared: Test environment: x86-64 Intel Core2 Q8400, system memory 4GB, Ubuntu 12.04, kernel v3.15.0-rc3 as base, zram with 4 max_comp_streams LZO. iozone test: iozone -t 4 -R -r 16K -s 200M -I +Z (1GB zram with ext4 filesystem, take the average of 10 tests, KB/s) Test base CAS spinlock rwlock bit_spinlock ------------------------------------------------------------------- Initial write 1381094 1425435 1422860 1423075 1421521 Rewrite 1529479 1641199 1668762 1672855 1654910 Read 8468009 11324979 11305569 11117273 10997202 Re-read 8467476 11260914 11248059 11145336 10906486 Reverse Read 6821393 8106334 8282174 8279195 8109186 Stride read 7191093 8994306 9153982 8961224 9004434 Random read 7156353 8957932 9167098 8980465 8940476 Mixed workload 4172747 5680814 5927825 5489578 5972253 Random write 1483044 1605588 1594329 1600453 1596010 Pwrite 1276644 1303108 1311612 1314228 1300960 Pread 4324337 4632869 4618386 4457870 4500166 To enhance the possibility of access the same table[index] concurrently, set zram a small disksize(10MB) and let threads run with large loop count. fio test: fio --bs=32k --randrepeat=1 --randseed=100 --refill_buffers --scramble_buffers=1 --direct=1 --loops=3000 --numjobs=4 --filename=/dev/zram0 --name=seq-write --rw=write --stonewall --name=seq-read --rw=read --stonewall --name=seq-readwrite --rw=rw --stonewall --name=rand-readwrite --rw=randrw --stonewall (10MB zram raw block device, take the average of 10 tests, KB/s) Test base CAS spinlock rwlock bit_spinlock ------------------------------------------------------------- seq-write 933789 999357 1003298 995961 1001958 seq-read 5634130 6577930 6380861 6243912 6230006 seq-rw 1405687 1638117 1640256 1633903 1634459 rand-rw 1386119 1614664 1617211 1609267 1612471 All the optimization methods show a higher performance than the base, however, it is hard to say which method is the most appropriate. On the other hand, zram is mostly used on small embedded system, so we don't want to increase any memory footprint. This patch pick the bit_spinlock method, pack object size and page_flag into an unsigned long table.value, so as to not increase any memory overhead on both 32-bit and 64-bit system. On the third hand, even though different kinds of locks have different performances, we can ignore this difference, because: if zram is used as zram swapfile, the swap subsystem can prevent concurrent access to the same swapslot; if zram is used as zram-blk for set up filesystem on it, the upper filesystem and the page cache also prevent concurrent access of the same block mostly. So we can ignore the different performances among locks. Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-08-06zram: remove unused SECTOR_SIZE defineSergey Senozhatsky
Drop SECTOR_SIZE define, because it's not used. Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Cc: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-08-06zram: rename struct `table' to `zram_table_entry'Sergey Senozhatsky
Andrew Morton has recently noted that `struct table' actually represents table entry and, thus, should be renamed. Rename to `zram_table_entry'. Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Cc: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-04-07zram: make compression algorithm selection possibleSergey Senozhatsky
Add and document `comp_algorithm' device attribute. This attribute allows to show supported compression and currently selected compression algorithms: cat /sys/block/zram0/comp_algorithm [lzo] lz4 and change selected compression algorithm: echo lzo > /sys/block/zram0/comp_algorithm Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-04-07zram: add multi stream functionalitySergey Senozhatsky
Existing zram (zcomp) implementation has only one compression stream (buffer and algorithm private part), so in order to prevent data corruption only one write (compress operation) can use this compression stream, forcing all concurrent write operations to wait for stream lock to be released. This patch changes zcomp to keep a compression streams list of user-defined size (via sysfs device attr). Each write operation still exclusively holds compression stream, the difference is that we can have N write operations (depending on size of streams list) executing in parallel. See TEST section later in commit message for performance data. Introduce struct zcomp_strm_multi and a set of functions to manage zcomp_strm stream access. zcomp_strm_multi has a list of idle zcomp_strm structs, spinlock to protect idle list and wait queue, making it possible to perform parallel compressions. The following set of functions added: - zcomp_strm_multi_find()/zcomp_strm_multi_release() find and release a compression stream, implement required locking - zcomp_strm_multi_create()/zcomp_strm_multi_destroy() create and destroy zcomp_strm_multi zcomp ->strm_find() and ->strm_release() callbacks are set during initialisation to zcomp_strm_multi_find()/zcomp_strm_multi_release() correspondingly. Each time zcomp issues a zcomp_strm_multi_find() call, the following set of operations performed: - spin lock strm_lock - if idle list is not empty, remove zcomp_strm from idle list, spin unlock and return zcomp stream pointer to caller - if idle list is empty, current adds itself to wait queue. it will be awaken by zcomp_strm_multi_release() caller. zcomp_strm_multi_release(): - spin lock strm_lock - add zcomp stream to idle list - spin unlock, wake up sleeper Minchan Kim reported that spinlock-based locking scheme has demonstrated a severe perfomance regression for single compression stream case, comparing to mutex-based (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/18/16) base spinlock mutex ==Initial write ==Initial write ==Initial write records: 5 records: 5 records: 5 avg: 1642424.35 avg: 699610.40 avg: 1655583.71 std: 39890.95(2.43%) std: 232014.19(33.16%) std: 52293.96 max: 1690170.94 max: 1163473.45 max: 1697164.75 min: 1568669.52 min: 573429.88 min: 1553410.23 ==Rewrite ==Rewrite ==Rewrite records: 5 records: 5 records: 5 avg: 1611775.39 avg: 501406.64 avg: 1684419.11 std: 17144.58(1.06%) std: 15354.41(3.06%) std: 18367.42 max: 1641800.95 max: 531356.78 max: 1706445.84 min: 1593515.27 min: 488817.78 min: 1655335.73 When only one compression stream available, mutex with spin on owner tends to perform much better than frequent wait_event()/wake_up(). This is why single stream implemented as a special case with mutex locking. Introduce and document zram device attribute max_comp_streams. This attr shows and stores current zcomp's max number of zcomp streams (max_strm). Extend zcomp's zcomp_create() with `max_strm' parameter. `max_strm' limits the number of zcomp_strm structs in compression backend's idle list (max_comp_streams). max_comp_streams used during initialisation as follows: -- passing to zcomp_create() max_strm equals to 1 will initialise zcomp using single compression stream zcomp_strm_single (mutex-based locking). -- passing to zcomp_create() max_strm greater than 1 will initialise zcomp using multi compression stream zcomp_strm_multi (spinlock-based locking). default max_comp_streams value is 1, meaning that zram with single stream will be initialised. Later patch will introduce configuration knob to change max_comp_streams on already initialised and used zcomp. TEST iozone -t 3 -R -r 16K -s 60M -I +Z test base 1 strm (mutex) 3 strm (spinlock) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Initial write 589286.78 583518.39 718011.05 Rewrite 604837.97 596776.38 1515125.72 Random write 584120.11 595714.58 1388850.25 Pwrite 535731.17 541117.38 739295.27 Fwrite 1418083.88 1478612.72 1484927.06 Usage example: set max_comp_streams to 4 echo 4 > /sys/block/zram0/max_comp_streams show current max_comp_streams (default value is 1). cat /sys/block/zram0/max_comp_streams Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-04-07zram: use zcomp compressing backendsSergey Senozhatsky
Do not perform direct LZO compress/decompress calls, initialise and use zcomp LZO backend (single compression stream) instead. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: resolve conflicts with zram-delete-zram_init_device-fix.patch] Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-04-07zram: drop not used table `count' memberSergey Senozhatsky
struct table `count' member is not used. Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-04-07zram: use atomic64_t for all zram statsSergey Senozhatsky
This is a preparation patch for stats code duplication removal. 1) use atomic64_t for `pages_zero' and `pages_stored' zram stats. 2) `compr_size' and `pages_zero' struct zram_stats members did not follow the existing device attr naming scheme: zram_stats.ATTR has ATTR_show() function. rename them: -- compr_size -> compr_data_size -- pages_zero -> zero_pages Minchan Kim's note: If we really have trouble with atomic stat operation, we could change it with percpu_counter so that it could solve atomic overhead and unnecessary memory space by introducing unsigned long instead of 64bit atomic_t. Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-04-07zram: remove good and bad compress statsSergey Senozhatsky
Remove `good' and `bad' compressed sub-requests stats. RW request may cause a number of RW sub-requests. zram used to account `good' compressed sub-queries (with compressed size less than 50% of original size), `bad' compressed sub-queries (with compressed size greater that 75% of original size), leaving sub-requests with compression size between 50% and 75% of original size not accounted and not reported. zram already accounts each sub-request's compression size so we can calculate real device compression ratio. Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-04-07zram: drop `init_done' struct zram memberSergey Senozhatsky
Introduce init_done() helper function which allows us to drop `init_done' struct zram member. init_done() uses the fact that ->init_done == 1 equals to ->meta != NULL. Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-01-30zram: remove zram->lock in read path and change it with mutexMinchan Kim
Finally, we separated zram->lock dependency from 32bit stat/ table handling so there is no reason to use rw_semaphore between read and write path so this patch removes the lock from read path totally and changes rw_semaphore with mutex. So, we could do old: read-read: OK read-write: NO write-write: NO Now: read-read: OK read-write: OK write-write: NO The below data proves mixed workload performs well 11 times and there is also enhance on write-write path because current rw-semaphore doesn't support SPIN_ON_OWNER. It's side effect but anyway good thing for us. Write-related tests perform better (from 61% to 1058%) but read path has good/bad(from -2.22% to 1.45%) but they are all marginal within stddev. CPU 12 iozone -t -T -l 12 -u 12 -r 16K -s 60M -I +Z -V 0 ==Initial write ==Initial write records: 10 records: 10 avg: 516189.16 avg: 839907.96 std: 22486.53 (4.36%) std: 47902.17 (5.70%) max: 546970.60 max: 909910.35 min: 481131.54 min: 751148.38 ==Rewrite ==Rewrite records: 10 records: 10 avg: 509527.98 avg: 1050156.37 std: 45799.94 (8.99%) std: 40695.44 (3.88%) max: 611574.27 max: 1111929.26 min: 443679.95 min: 980409.62 ==Read ==Read records: 10 records: 10 avg: 4408624.17 avg: 4472546.76 std: 281152.61 (6.38%) std: 163662.78 (3.66%) max: 4867888.66 max: 4727351.03 min: 4058347.69 min: 4126520.88 ==Re-read ==Re-read records: 10 records: 10 avg: 4462147.53 avg: 4363257.75 std: 283546.11 (6.35%) std: 247292.63 (5.67%) max: 4912894.44 max: 4677241.75 min: 4131386.50 min: 4035235.84 ==Reverse Read ==Reverse Read records: 10 records: 10 avg: 4565865.97 avg: 4485818.08 std: 313395.63 (6.86%) std: 248470.10 (5.54%) max: 5232749.16 max: 4789749.94 min: 4185809.62 min: 3963081.34 ==Stride read ==Stride read records: 10 records: 10 avg: 4515981.80 avg: 4418806.01 std: 211192.32 (4.68%) std: 212837.97 (4.82%) max: 4889287.28 max: 4686967.22 min: 4210362.00 min: 4083041.84 ==Random read ==Random read records: 10 records: 10 avg: 4410525.23 avg: 4387093.18 std: 236693.22 (5.37%) std: 235285.23 (5.36%) max: 4713698.47 max: 4669760.62 min: 4057163.62 min: 3952002.16 ==Mixed workload ==Mixed workload records: 10 records: 10 avg: 243234.25 avg: 2818677.27 std: 28505.07 (11.72%) std: 195569.70 (6.94%) max: 288905.23 max: 3126478.11 min: 212473.16 min: 2484150.69 ==Random write ==Random write records: 10 records: 10 avg: 555887.07 avg: 1053057.79 std: 70841.98 (12.74%) std: 35195.36 (3.34%) max: 683188.28 max: 1096125.73 min: 437299.57 min: 992481.93 ==Pwrite ==Pwrite records: 10 records: 10 avg: 501745.93 avg: 810363.09 std: 16373.54 (3.26%) std: 19245.01 (2.37%) max: 518724.52 max: 833359.70 min: 464208.73 min: 765501.87 ==Pread ==Pread records: 10 records: 10 avg: 4539894.60 avg: 4457680.58 std: 197094.66 (4.34%) std: 188965.60 (4.24%) max: 4877170.38 max: 4689905.53 min: 4226326.03 min: 4095739.72 Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Tested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-01-30zram: remove workqueue for freeing removed pending slotMinchan Kim
Commit a0c516cbfc74 ("zram: don't grab mutex in zram_slot_free_noity") introduced free request pending code to avoid scheduling by mutex under spinlock and it was a mess which made code lenghty and increased overhead. Now, we don't need zram->lock any more to free slot so this patch reverts it and then, tb_lock should protect it. Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Tested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-01-30zram: introduce zram->tb_lockMinchan Kim
Currently, the zram table is protected by zram->lock but it's rather coarse-grained lock and it makes hard for scalibility. Let's use own rwlock instead of depending on zram->lock. This patch adds new locking so obviously, it would make slow but this patch is just prepartion for removing coarse-grained rw_semaphore(ie, zram->lock) which is hurdle about zram scalability. Final patch in this patchset series will remove the lock from read-path and change rw_semaphore with mutex in write path. With bonus, we could drop pending slot free mess in next patch. Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Tested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-01-30zram: use atomic operation for statMinchan Kim
Some of fields in zram->stats are protected by zram->lock which is rather coarse-grained so let's use atomic operation without explict locking. This patch is ready for removing dependency of zram->lock in read path which is very coarse-grained rw_semaphore. Of course, this patch adds new atomic operation so it might make slow but my 12CPU test couldn't spot any regression. All gain/lose is marginal within stddev. iozone -t -T -l 12 -u 12 -r 16K -s 60M -I +Z -V 0 ==Initial write ==Initial write records: 50 records: 50 avg: 412875.17 avg: 415638.23 std: 38543.12 (9.34%) std: 36601.11 (8.81%) max: 521262.03 max: 502976.72 min: 343263.13 min: 351389.12 ==Rewrite ==Rewrite records: 50 records: 50 avg: 416640.34 avg: 397914.33 std: 60798.92 (14.59%) std: 46150.42 (11.60%) max: 543057.07 max: 522669.17 min: 304071.67 min: 316588.77 ==Read ==Read records: 50 records: 50 avg: 4147338.63 avg: 4070736.51 std: 179333.25 (4.32%) std: 223499.89 (5.49%) max: 4459295.28 max: 4539514.44 min: 3753057.53 min: 3444686.31 ==Re-read ==Re-read records: 50 records: 50 avg: 4096706.71 avg: 4117218.57 std: 229735.04 (5.61%) std: 171676.25 (4.17%) max: 4430012.09 max: 4459263.94 min: 2987217.80 min: 3666904.28 ==Reverse Read ==Reverse Read records: 50 records: 50 avg: 4062763.83 avg: 4078508.32 std: 186208.46 (4.58%) std: 172684.34 (4.23%) max: 4401358.78 max: 4424757.22 min: 3381625.00 min: 3679359.94 ==Stride read ==Stride read records: 50 records: 50 avg: 4094933.49 avg: 4082170.22 std: 185710.52 (4.54%) std: 196346.68 (4.81%) max: 4478241.25 max: 4460060.97 min: 3732593.23 min: 3584125.78 ==Random read ==Random read records: 50 records: 50 avg: 4031070.04 avg: 4074847.49 std: 192065.51 (4.76%) std: 206911.33 (5.08%) max: 4356931.16 max: 4399442.56 min: 3481619.62 min: 3548372.44 ==Mixed workload ==Mixed workload records: 50 records: 50 avg: 149925.73 avg: 149675.54 std: 7701.26 (5.14%) std: 6902.09 (4.61%) max: 191301.56 max: 175162.05 min: 133566.28 min: 137762.87 ==Random write ==Random write records: 50 records: 50 avg: 404050.11 avg: 393021.47 std: 58887.57 (14.57%) std: 42813.70 (10.89%) max: 601798.09 max: 524533.43 min: 325176.99 min: 313255.34 ==Pwrite ==Pwrite records: 50 records: 50 avg: 411217.70 avg: 411237.96 std: 43114.99 (10.48%) std: 33136.29 (8.06%) max: 530766.79 max: 471899.76 min: 320786.84 min: 317906.94 ==Pread ==Pread records: 50 records: 50 avg: 4154908.65 avg: 4087121.92 std: 151272.08 (3.64%) std: 219505.04 (5.37%) max: 4459478.12 max: 4435857.38 min: 3730512.41 min: 3101101.67 Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Tested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-01-30zram: add copyrightMinchan Kim
Add my copyright to the zram source code which I maintain. Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-01-30zram: remove old private project commentMinchan Kim
Remove the old private compcache project address so upcoming patches should be sent to LKML because we Linux kernel community will take care. Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-01-30zram: promote zram from stagingMinchan Kim
Zram has lived in staging for a LONG LONG time and have been fixed/improved by many contributors so code is clean and stable now. Of course, there are lots of product using zram in real practice. The major TV companys have used zram as swap since two years ago and recently our production team released android smart phone with zram which is used as swap, too and recently Android Kitkat start to use zram for small memory smart phone. And there was a report Google released their ChromeOS with zram, too and cyanogenmod have been used zram long time ago. And I heard some disto have used zram block device for tmpfs. In addition, I saw many report from many other peoples. For example, Lubuntu start to use it. The benefit of zram is very clear. With my experience, one of the benefit was to remove jitter of video application with backgroud memory pressure. It would be effect of efficient memory usage by compression but more issue is whether swap is there or not in the system. Recent mobile platforms have used JAVA so there are many anonymous pages. But embedded system normally are reluctant to use eMMC or SDCard as swap because there is wear-leveling and latency issues so if we do not use swap, it means we can't reclaim anoymous pages and at last, we could encounter OOM kill. :( Although we have real storage as swap, it was a problem, too. Because it sometime ends up making system very unresponsible caused by slow swap storage performance. Quote from Luigi on Google "Since Chrome OS was mentioned: the main reason why we don't use swap to a disk (rotating or SSD) is because it doesn't degrade gracefully and leads to a bad interactive experience. Generally we prefer to manage RAM at a higher level, by transparently killing and restarting processes. But we noticed that zram is fast enough to be competitive with the latter, and it lets us make more efficient use of the available RAM. " and he announced. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg57717.html Other uses case is to use zram for block device. Zram is block device so anyone can format the block device and mount on it so some guys on the internet start zram as /var/tmp. http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-838198-start-0.html Let's promote zram and enhance/maintain it instead of removing. Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Acked-by: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>