| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Currently, show-recipes will append "(skipped)" marker to recipes which
were skipped due these recipes does not satisfied the configurations.
Example: $ bitbake-layers show-recipes -r
ace
backport-iwlwifi
core-image-rt (skipped)
core-image-rt-sdk (skipped)
core-image-tiny
Add -b/--bare to enable output names without "(skipped)" marker.
Example: $ bitbake-layers show-recipes -r -b
ace
backport-iwlwifi
core-image-rt
core-image-rt-sdk
core-image-tiny
(Bitbake rev: 87796e580cd160a535eb5fb9e31846a7cf1a249e)
Signed-off-by: Yeoh Ee Peng <ee.peng.yeoh@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Currently, show-recipes will show recipes from all configured layers.
Assume, meta-intel layer was added to conf/bblayers.conf.
Example of default $ bitbake-layers show-recipes:
core-image-rt:
meta-intel unknown (skipped)
meta unknown (skipped)
Add -l/--layer to enable showing recipes from user selected layer.
Example: $ bitbake-layers show-recipes -l meta-intel
core-image-rt:
meta-intel unknown (skipped)
(Bitbake rev: 8c38d95c4474ea171cb55b0e336d9090451e89ce)
Signed-off-by: Yeoh Ee Peng <ee.peng.yeoh@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Currently, show-recipes will show all recipes available (both
recipes with different version and recipes provided by more
than one layer).
Example of default $ bitbake-layers show-recipes:
core-image-rt:
meta-intel unknown (skipped)
meta unknown (skipped)
yajl:
meta-oe 2.1.0
meta-oe 1.0.12
Add -r/--recipes-only to enable showing recipes only. This
provide a focus view on unique recipes available.
Example of $ bitbake-layers show-recipes -r:
core-image-rt (skipped)
yajl
(Bitbake rev: 048bd051a9b422a38c181f57bb5090a05684a5c3)
Signed-off-by: Yeoh Ee Peng <ee.peng.yeoh@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This adds the SPDX-License-Identifier license headers to the majority of
our source files to make it clearer exactly which license files are under.
The bulk of the files are under GPL v2.0 with one found to be under V2.0
or later, some under MIT and some have dual license. There are some files
which are potentially harder to classify where we've imported upstream code
and those can be handled specifically in later commits.
The COPYING file is replaced with LICENSE.X files which contain the full
license texts.
(Bitbake rev: ff237c33337f4da2ca06c3a2c49699bc26608a6b)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
(Bitbake rev: cb4aab7406dc8aefb646b37330b722cf9060ad73)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
These don't need to access recipe information, so let's not waste the
user's time parsing all recipes.
(Bitbake rev: 6a242a399ae93393c3fc60eda541c1f8f77fed57)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Display changes:
The output will now include references to the layers that the user already
has on their system. It does this by querying the cooker derived index.
The code that enables this behavior is labeled as 'TODO' currently. As
part of the work we need to make a final determination if this is the
desired output.
Also changed the default branch to no longer define itself as 'master'.
When the user does NOT set a branch, the default is now the
'LAYERSERIES_CORENAMES', and if that doesn't exist 'master'. This is
subtly different in behavior, but more consistent with user expectations.
(Bitbake rev: 478c4b5489943f756ae03d6b6d3b5d665cedbce0)
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When a layer is added it needs to be in a list, otherwise the system will
error such as:
Specified layer directory / doesn't contain a conf/layer.conf file
Additionally, instead of calling the add layer function over and over, it
is better to add all of the new content in one command. Otherwise the
order is important as the system now checks if the layer can be added. For
instance, trying to add meta-python:
Layer Required by Git repository Subdirectory
===================================================================================================================
meta-python - git://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded meta-python
meta-oe meta-python git://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded meta-oe
openembedded-core meta-python git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core meta
Adding layer "meta-python" (.../oe-core/meta-openembedded/meta-python) to conf/bblayers.conf
ERROR: Layer 'meta-python' depends on layer 'openembedded-layer', but this layer is not enabled in your configuration
The system would try to add meta-python before the dependent meta-oe. Adding
them both at the same time resolves this issue.
(Bitbake rev: 8aeaabf13db645f33495e00b82117327e153d70a)
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When adding multiple layers in a chain of commands, reparsing all recipes
each time can be painfully slow. Instead just parse the base configuration
which gives some confidence things worked out correctly without as much
overhead.
(Bitbake rev: cfd1302031f3cca96300a0e445a47b1614ecd00c)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
multiple classes
The -i option supports more than one class, but the help didn't mention
that.
(Bitbake rev: 1060955c4aa2ef66cdb4f0549f9bd8c1c332673c)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
time
If you can add multiple layers at once, it stands to reason that you
should also be able to remove more than one at a time.
(Bitbake rev: 2f2033836a5ce4064d9e4f263788a563001bc008)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Allow specifying multiple layers with bitbake-layers add-layer so that
you can add more than one in a single command. This is not just useful,
it's actually pretty important if you need to add a layer and its
dependencies at the same time - since we now go through a parse process
when the layer is added, without this you have to add them all in just
the right order and wait for the parse each time which is somewhat
painful.
(Bitbake rev: ad6b14f01aa326a1c6baa31bfac33be238bce805)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
bitbake-layers show-recipes and show-appends supported listing all recipes
or one recipe. Adjust the system to permit specifying more then one recipe.
Also update show-appends to match the --help description and support file
style wildcards for selecting the recipe to display.
(Bitbake rev: d72c1a91c261d78004d80e2fe5634f0e5f1ef947)
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Adding layer "meta-signing-key" to conf/bblayers.conf
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/local/build/project/build/poky/bitbake/bin/bitbake-layers",
line 103, in <module>
ret = main()
File "/local/build/project/build/poky/bitbake/bin/bitbake-layers",
line 96, in main
return args.func(args)
File
"/local/build/project/build/poky/bitbake/lib/bblayers/layerindex.py",
line 250, in do_layerindex_fetch
self.do_add_layer(localargs)
File
"/local/build/project/build/poky/bitbake/lib/bblayers/action.py", line
44, in do_add_layer
if not (args.force or notadded):
AttributeError: 'Namespace' object has no attribute 'force'
(Bitbake rev: 4325f7a7df67eaf4b51af03b453e84bf88fae408)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
In the original implementation, "bitbake-layers add-layers <layer>"
succeeded without error checking. This will further introduce
failures in recipe parsing only when "bitbake" command is executed.
Adding a meta layer without its dependency layer(s) should failed
and exit the process gracefully.
Added extra argument "-F" to force add a layer without checking
layer dependency.
[YOCTO #10913]
(Bitbake rev: 705ab252e631903e6d2e46202b419a9e8adcd861)
Signed-off-by: Phoong Stanley Cheong Kwan <stanley.cheong.kwan.phoong@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chang Rebecca Swee Fun <rebecca.swee.fun.chang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The data we read from an HTTPConnection comes in the form of bytes, but
we need it as a string, so in Python 3 we need to decode it (missed in
the Python 3 migration).
(Bitbake rev: 7e6a3cd1472e1a1c8304b46611e1676914a68b59)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
package list
Add ability to limit output per package:
$ bitbake-layers show-appends m4
=== Matched appended recipes ===
m4_1.4.17.bb:
/home/mattsm/git/openembedded-core/meta-selftest/recipes-test/m4/m4_1.4.17.bbappend
Useful for writing tools to process the output, and debugging
bbappends for specific packages
(Bitbake rev: 43668657a8a679acc957e26e6fd8f47ab4cb3da8)
Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock <msm-oss@mcclintock.net>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Rewrite tinfoil as a wrapper around the UI, instead of the earlier
approach of starting up just enough of cooker to do what we want. This
has several advantages:
* It now works when bitbake is memory-resident instead of failing with
"ERROR: Only one copy of bitbake should be run against a build
directory".
* We can now connect an actual UI, thus you get things like the recipe
parsing / cache loading progress bar and parse error handling for free
* We can now handle events generated by the server if we wish to do so
* We can potentially extend this to do more stuff, e.g. actually running
build operations - this needs to be made more practical before we can
use it though (since you effectively have to become the UI yourself
for this at the moment.)
The downside is that tinfoil no longer has direct access to cooker, the
global datastore, or the cache. To mitigate this I have extended
data_smart to provide remote access capability for the datastore, and
created "fake" cooker and cooker.recipecache / cooker.collection adapter
objects in order to avoid breaking too many tinfoil-using scripts that
might be out there (we've never officially documented tinfoil or
BitBake's internal code, but we can still make accommodations where
practical). I've at least gone far enough to support all of the
utilities that use tinfoil in OE-Core with some changes, but I know
there are scripts such as Chris Larson's "bb" out there that do make
other calls into BitBake code that I'm not currently providing access to
through the adapters.
Part of the fix for [YOCTO #5470].
(Bitbake rev: 3bbf8d611c859f74d563778115677a04f5c4ab43)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
getVar() now defaults to expanding by default, thus remove the True
option from getVar() calls with a regex search and replace.
Search made with the following regex: getVar ?\(( ?[^,()]*), True\)
(Bitbake rev: 3b45c479de8640f92dd1d9f147b02e1eecfaadc8)
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <joshua.g.lock@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This patch adds the notion of supporting multiple configurations within
a single build. To enable it, set a line in local.conf like:
BBMULTICONFIG = "configA configB configC"
This would tell bitbake that before it parses the base configuration,
it should load conf/configA.conf and so on for each different
configuration. These would contain lines like:
MACHINE = "A"
or other variables which can be set which can be built in the same
build directory (or change TMPDIR not to conflict).
One downside I've already discovered is that if we want to inherit this
file right at the start of parsing, the only place you can put the
configurations is in "cwd", since BBPATH isn't constructed until the
layers are parsed and therefore using it as a preconf file isn't
possible unless its located there.
Execution of these targets takes the form "bitbake
multiconfig:configA:core-image-minimal core-image-sato" so similar to
our virtclass approach for native/nativesdk/multilib using BBCLASSEXTEND.
Implementation wise, the implication is that instead of tasks being
uniquely referenced with "recipename/fn:task" it now needs to be
"configuration:recipename:task".
We already started using "virtual" filenames for recipes when we
implemented BBCLASSEXTEND and this patch adds a new prefix to
these, "multiconfig:<configname>:" and hence avoid changes to a large
part of the codebase thanks to this. databuilder has an internal array
of data stores and uses the right one depending on the supplied virtual
filename.
That trick allows us to use the existing parsing code including the
multithreading mostly unchanged as well as most of the cache code.
For recipecache, we end up with a dict of these accessed by
multiconfig (mc). taskdata and runqueue can only cope with one recipecache
so for taskdata, we pass in each recipecache and have it compute the result
and end up with an array of taskdatas. We can only have one runqueue so there
extensive changes there.
This initial implementation has some drawbacks:
a) There are no inter-multi-configuration dependencies as yet
b) There are no sstate optimisations. This means if the build uses the
same object twice in say two different TMPDIRs, it will either load from
an existing sstate cache at the start or build it twice. We can then in
due course look at ways in which it would only build it once and then
reuse it. This will likely need significant changes to the way sstate
currently works to make that possible.
(Bitbake rev: 5287991691578825c847bac2368e9b51c0ede3f0)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Needing to access these static methods through a class doesn't
make sense. Move these to become module level standalone functions.
(Bitbake rev: 6d06e93c6a2204af6d2cf747a4610bd0eeb9f202)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
We don't need to parse all recipes just to show the list of layers,
since that comes straight from the configuration, so save a bit of time
by not doing so. (A minor regression that came in with the the
bitbake-layers refactoring).
(Bitbake rev: a609ad7d560260a8d50dfa197cd960f496c5da73)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Various misc changes to convert bitbake to python3 which don't warrant
separation into separate commits.
(Bitbake rev: d0f904d407f57998419bd9c305ce53e5eaa36b24)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This uses bb.utils.load_plugins, based on the plugin handling in recipetool
and devtool in oe-core.
(Bitbake rev: 5e542df9b966a99b5a5b8aa7cf6100174aff54b2)
Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
Yeoh Ee Peng
Richard Purdie
Ross Burton
Mark Hatle
Paul Eggleton
Jeremy A. Puhlman
Chang Rebecca Swee Fun
Matthew McClintock
Joshua Lock
Christopher Larson