aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/classes/fsl-dynamic-packagearch.bbclass
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2014-02-19fsl-dynamic-packagearch.bbclass: fix typoJavier Viguera
s/PACHAGE_ARCH/PACKAGE_ARCH Signed-off-by: Javier Viguera <javier.viguera@digi.com>
2013-09-25fsl-dynamic-packagearch.bbclass: Dynamically set package architectureOtavio Salvador
This allow to easy reuse of binary packages among similar SoCs. The usual use for this is to share SoC specific packages among different boards. The class can be used to share GPU packages for i.MX53 boards (as all them share the AMD GPU) and i.MX6 based boards (as all them share Vivante GPU). It inspects the database and identify if the package provides or depends on one of subarch provided values and if it does, it sets the PACKAGE_ARCH for MACHINE_SUBARCH value otherwise if it matches in the machine specific filter, it sets it to MACHINE_ARCH. This reduces the amount of packages we build, for example in case of core-image-x11 we: $ ls -l tmp/deploy/rpm/cortexa9hf_vfp_neon_mx6/*.rpm | wc -l 75 So we reuse 75 binaries; these would be build otherwise. It being dynamically set or statically set it has following benefits: * correctness: it is easier to ensure the system behaves as expected * correctness for non-tracked recipes: new recipes, if depending on virtual/kernel or GPU has the right architecture choosen, without a .bbappend file for them * safeness: non-expert users get a more adequate behavior as the complexity of choosing the right architecture is simplified for them * easy maintenance: it is easier for me, as maintainer, to maintain a code which decides what to do than having hundreds of bbappend files for it Change-Id: Icb0a8060e862c8eeb166c45d1b39c40de07b01d8 Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>