summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/samples/bpf/test_overhead_kprobe_kern.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-07-21samples/bpf, selftests/bpf: Use bpf_probe_read_kernelIlya Leoshkevich
A handful of samples and selftests fail to build on s390, because after commit 0ebeea8ca8a4 ("bpf: Restrict bpf_probe_read{, str}() only to archs where they work") bpf_probe_read is not available anymore. Fix by using bpf_probe_read_kernel. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200720114806.88823-1-iii@linux.ibm.com
2020-01-20samples/bpf: Use consistent include paths for libbpfToke Høiland-Jørgensen
Fix all files in samples/bpf to include libbpf header files with the bpf/ prefix, to be consistent with external users of the library. Also ensure that all includes of exported libbpf header files (those that are exported on 'make install' of the library) use bracketed includes instead of quoted. To make sure no new files are introduced that doesn't include the bpf/ prefix in its include, remove tools/lib/bpf from the include path entirely, and use tools/lib instead. Fixes: 6910d7d3867a ("selftests/bpf: Ensure bpf_helper_defs.h are taken from selftests dir") Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/157952560911.1683545.8795966751309534150.stgit@toke.dk
2019-10-08selftests/bpf: Split off tracing-only helpers into bpf_tracing.hAndrii Nakryiko
Split-off PT_REGS-related helpers into bpf_tracing.h header. Adjust selftests and samples to include it where necessary. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191008175942.1769476-5-andriin@fb.com
2016-04-07samples/bpf: add tracepoint vs kprobe performance testsAlexei Starovoitov
the first microbenchmark does fd=open("/proc/self/comm"); for() { write(fd, "test"); } and on 4 cpus in parallel: writes per sec base (no tracepoints, no kprobes) 930k with kprobe at __set_task_comm() 420k with tracepoint at task:task_rename 730k For kprobe + full bpf program manully fetches oldcomm, newcomm via bpf_probe_read. For tracepint bpf program does nothing, since arguments are copied by tracepoint. 2nd microbenchmark does: fd=open("/dev/urandom"); for() { read(fd, buf); } and on 4 cpus in parallel: reads per sec base (no tracepoints, no kprobes) 300k with kprobe at urandom_read() 279k with tracepoint at random:urandom_read 290k bpf progs attached to kprobe and tracepoint are noop. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>