| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
[ Upstream commit cc8a8bc37466f79b24d972555237f3d591150602 ]
While looking at on-air packets using Wireshark, I noticed we're never
setting the initiator bit when sending DELBA requests to the AP: While
we set the bit on our del_ba_param_set bitmask, we forget to actually
copy that bitmask over to the command struct, which means we never
actually set the initiator bit.
Fix that and copy the bitmask over to the host_cmd_ds_11n_delba command
struct.
Fixes: 5e6e3a92b9a4 ("wireless: mwifiex: initial commit for Marvell mwifiex driver")
Signed-off-by: Jonas Dreßler <verdre@v0yd.nl>
Acked-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211016153244.24353-5-verdre@v0yd.nl
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
uninitilized variable, such as .add_req_result might be magic stack
value. Initialize the structure to make it clean.
Signed-off-by: Xinming Hu <huxm@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Cathy Luo <cluo@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
The mwifiex_11n_delba() function walked the rx_reorder_tbl_ptr without
holding the lock, which was an obvious violation.
Grab the lock.
NOTE: we hold the lock while calling mwifiex_send_delba(). There's also
several callers in 11n_rxreorder.c that hold the lock and the comments
in the struct sound just like very other list/lock pair -- as if the
lock should definitely be help for all operations like this.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Despite the macro list_for_each_entry_safe() having the word "safe" in
the name, it's still not actually safe to release the list spinlock
while iterating over the list. The "safe" in the macro name actually
only means that it's safe to delete the current entry while iterating
over the list.
Releasing the spinlock while iterating over the list means that someone
else could come in and adjust the list while we don't have the
spinlock. If they do that it can totally mix up our iteration and fully
corrupt the list. Later iterating over a corrupted list while holding a
spinlock and having IRQs off can cause all sorts of hard to debug
problems.
As evidenced by the other call to
mwifiex_11n_delete_tx_ba_stream_tbl_entry() in
mwifiex_11n_delete_all_tx_ba_stream_tbl(), it's actually safe to skip
the spinlock release. Let's do that.
No known problems are fixed by this patch, but it could fix all sorts of
weird problems and it should be very safe.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Part of reorganising wireless drivers directory and Kconfig.
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
Jonas Dreßler
Xinming Hu
Douglas Anderson
Kalle Valo