| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
[ Upstream commit d7fd8634f48d76aa799ed57beb7d87dab91bde80 ]
Using strncpy can result in non-NULL-terminated destination string. Use
strscpy instead. This fixes following warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c: In function ‘msm_fence_context_alloc’:
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c:25:9: warning: ‘strncpy’ specified bound 32 equals destination size [-Wstringop-truncation]
25 | strncpy(fctx->name, name, sizeof(fctx->name));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Fixes: f97decac5f4c ("drm/msm: Support multiple ringbuffers")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/518787/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230118020152.1689213-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 7ad48d27a2846bfda29214fb454d001c3e02b9e7 ]
We have seen a couple cases where low memory situations cause something
bad to happen, followed by a flood of these messages obscuring the root
cause. Lets ratelimit the dmesg spam so that next time it happens we
don't lose the kernel traces leading up to this.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
Add the infrastructure to support the idea of multiple ringbuffers.
Assign each ringbuffer an id and use that as an index for the various
ring specific operations.
The biggest delta is to support legacy fences. Each fence gets its own
sequence number but the legacy functions expect to use a unique integer.
To handle this we return a unique identifier for each submission but
map it to a specific ring/sequence under the covers. Newer users use
a dma_fence pointer anyway so they don't care about the actual sequence
ID or ring.
The actual mechanics for multiple ringbuffers are very target specific
so this code just allows for the possibility but still only defines
one ringbuffer for each target family.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
|
|
If we follow the typical pattern of the base class being the first
member, we can use the default dma_fence_free function.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
|
|
I plan to usurp the short name of struct fence for a core kernel struct,
and so I need to rename the specialised fence/timeline for DMA
operations to make room.
A consensus was reached in
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-July/113083.html
that making clear this fence applies to DMA operations was a good thing.
Since then the patch has grown a bit as usage increases, so hopefully it
remains a good thing!
(v2...: rebase, rerun spatch)
v3: Compile on msm, spotted a manual fixup that I broke.
v4: Try again for msm, sorry Daniel
coccinelle script:
@@
@@
- struct fence
+ struct dma_fence
@@
@@
- struct fence_ops
+ struct dma_fence_ops
@@
@@
- struct fence_cb
+ struct dma_fence_cb
@@
@@
- struct fence_array
+ struct dma_fence_array
@@
@@
- enum fence_flag_bits
+ enum dma_fence_flag_bits
@@
@@
(
- fence_init
+ dma_fence_init
|
- fence_release
+ dma_fence_release
|
- fence_free
+ dma_fence_free
|
- fence_get
+ dma_fence_get
|
- fence_get_rcu
+ dma_fence_get_rcu
|
- fence_put
+ dma_fence_put
|
- fence_signal
+ dma_fence_signal
|
- fence_signal_locked
+ dma_fence_signal_locked
|
- fence_default_wait
+ dma_fence_default_wait
|
- fence_add_callback
+ dma_fence_add_callback
|
- fence_remove_callback
+ dma_fence_remove_callback
|
- fence_enable_sw_signaling
+ dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling
|
- fence_is_signaled_locked
+ dma_fence_is_signaled_locked
|
- fence_is_signaled
+ dma_fence_is_signaled
|
- fence_is_later
+ dma_fence_is_later
|
- fence_later
+ dma_fence_later
|
- fence_wait_timeout
+ dma_fence_wait_timeout
|
- fence_wait_any_timeout
+ dma_fence_wait_any_timeout
|
- fence_wait
+ dma_fence_wait
|
- fence_context_alloc
+ dma_fence_context_alloc
|
- fence_array_create
+ dma_fence_array_create
|
- to_fence_array
+ to_dma_fence_array
|
- fence_is_array
+ dma_fence_is_array
|
- trace_fence_emit
+ trace_dma_fence_emit
|
- FENCE_TRACE
+ DMA_FENCE_TRACE
|
- FENCE_WARN
+ DMA_FENCE_WARN
|
- FENCE_ERR
+ DMA_FENCE_ERR
)
(
...
)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161025120045.28839-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
|
|
This was only used for atomic commit these days. So instead just give
atomic it's own work-queue where we can do a block on each bo in turn.
Simplifies things a whole bunch and makes the 'struct fence' conversion
easier.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
|
|
Better encapsulate the per-timeline stuff into fence-context. For now
there is just a single fence-context, but eventually we'll also have one
per-CRTC to enable fully explicit fencing.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
|
Dmitry Baryshkov
Rob Clark
Jordan Crouse
Eric Anholt
Chris Wilson
Rob Clark