| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
[ Upstream commit d2c48b2387eb89e0bf2a2e06e30987cf410acad4 ]
Running a preempt-rt (v6.2-rc3-rt1) based kernel on an Ampere Altra
triggers:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:46
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 128, non_block: 0, pid: 24, name: cpuhp/0
preempt_count: 0, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
3 locks held by cpuhp/0/24:
#0: ffffda30217c70d0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x5c/0x248
#1: ffffda30217c7120 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x5c/0x248
#2: ffffda3021c711f0 (sdei_list_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: sdei_cpuhp_up+0x3c/0x130
irq event stamp: 36
hardirqs last enabled at (35): [<ffffda301e85b7bc>] finish_task_switch+0xb4/0x2b0
hardirqs last disabled at (36): [<ffffda301e812fec>] cpuhp_thread_fun+0x21c/0x248
softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffda301e80b184>] copy_process+0x63c/0x1ac0
softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
CPU: 0 PID: 24 Comm: cpuhp/0 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc3-rt5-[...]
Hardware name: WIWYNN Mt.Jade Server [...]
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x114/0x120
show_stack+0x20/0x70
dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xd8
dump_stack+0x18/0x34
__might_resched+0x188/0x228
rt_spin_lock+0x70/0x120
sdei_cpuhp_up+0x3c/0x130
cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x250/0xf08
cpuhp_thread_fun+0x120/0x248
smpboot_thread_fn+0x280/0x320
kthread+0x130/0x140
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
sdei_cpuhp_up() is called in the STARTING hotplug section,
which runs with interrupts disabled. Use a CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN entry
instead to execute the cpuhp cb later, with preemption enabled.
SDEI originally got its own cpuhp slot to allow interacting
with perf. It got superseded by pNMI and this early slot is not
relevant anymore. [1]
Some SDEI calls (e.g. SDEI_1_0_FN_SDEI_PE_MASK) take actions on the
calling CPU. It is checked that preemption is disabled for them.
_ONLINE cpuhp cb are executed in the 'per CPU hotplug thread'.
Preemption is enabled in those threads, but their cpumask is limited
to 1 CPU.
Move 'WARN_ON_ONCE(preemptible())' statements so that SDEI cpuhp cb
don't trigger them.
Also add a check for the SDEI_1_0_FN_SDEI_PRIVATE_RESET SDEI call
which acts on the calling CPU.
[1]:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/5813b8c5-ae3e-87fd-fccc-94c9cd08816d@arm.com/
Suggested-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230216084920.144064-1-pierre.gondois@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 54f529a6806c9710947a4f2cdc15d6ea54121ccd ]
SDEI has private events that need registering and enabling on each CPU.
CPUs can come and go while we are trying to do this. SDEI tries to avoid
these problems by setting the reregister flag before the register call,
so any CPUs that come online register the event too. Sticking plaster
like this doesn't work, as if the register call fails, a CPU that
subsequently comes online will register the event before reregister
is cleared.
Take cpus_read_lock() around the register and enable calls. We don't
want surprise CPUs to do the wrong thing if they race with these calls
failing.
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 6ded0b61cf638bf9f8efe60ab8ba23db60ea9763 ]
SDEI has private events that must be registered on each CPU. When
CPUs come and go they must re-register and re-enable their private
events. Each event has flags to indicate whether this should happen
to protect against an event being registered on a CPU coming online,
while all the others are unregistering the event.
These flags are protected by the sdei_list_lock spinlock, because
the cpuhp callbacks can't take the mutex.
Hibernate needs to unregister all events, but keep the in-memory
re-register and re-enable as they are. sdei_unregister_shared()
takes the spinlock to walk the list, then calls _sdei_event_unregister()
on each shared event. _sdei_event_unregister() tries to take the
same spinlock to update re-register and re-enable. This doesn't go
so well.
Push the re-register and re-enable updates out to their callers.
sdei_unregister_shared() doesn't want these values updated, so
doesn't need to do anything.
This also fixes shared events getting lost over hibernate as this
path made them look unregistered.
Fixes: da351827240e ("firmware: arm_sdei: Add support for CPU and system power states")
Reported-by: Liguang Zhang <zhangliguang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
Functions called in '_sdei_handler' are needed to be marked as
'nokprobe'. Because these functions are called in NMI context and
neither the arch-code's debug infrastructure nor kprobes core supports
this.
Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
|
|
APEI's Generic Hardware Error Source structures do not describe
whether the SDEI event is shared or private, as this information is
discoverable via the API.
GHES needs to know whether an event is normal or critical to avoid
sharing locks or fixmap entries, but GHES shouldn't have to know about
the SDEI API.
Add a helper to register the GHES using the appropriate normal or
critical callback.
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
It turns out the dt-probing part of this wasn't tested properly after it
was merged. commit 3aa0582fdb82 ("of: platform: populate /firmware/ node
from of_platform_default_populate_init()") changed the core-code to
generate the platform devices, meaning the driver's attempt fails, and it
bails out.
Fix this by removing the manual platform-device creation for DT systems,
core code has always done this for us.
CC: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
|
|
After finding a "firmware" dt node arm_sdei tries to match it's
compatible string with it. To do so it's calling of_find_matching_node()
which already takes care of decreasing the refcount on the "firmware"
node. We are then incorrectly decreasing the refcount on that node
again.
This patch removes the unwarranted call to of_node_put().
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
|
|
In case of error, the function of_platform_device_create() returns
NULL pointer not ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value
check should be replaced with NULL test.
Fixes: 677a60bd2003 ("firmware: arm_sdei: Discover SDEI support via ACPI")
Acked-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
SDEI defines a new ACPI table to indicate the presence of the interface.
The conduit is discovered in the same way as PSCI.
For ACPI we need to create the platform device ourselves as SDEI doesn't
have an entry in the DSDT.
The SDEI platform device should be created after ACPI has been initialised
so that we can parse the table, but before GHES devices are created, which
may register SDE events if they use SDEI as their notification type.
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
Private SDE events are per-cpu, and need to be registered and enabled
on each CPU.
Hide this detail from the caller by adapting our {,un}register and
{en,dis}able calls to send an IPI to each CPU if the event is private.
CPU private events are unregistered when the CPU is powered-off, and
re-registered when the CPU is brought back online. This saves bringing
secondary cores back online to call private_reset() on shutdown, kexec
and resume from hibernate.
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
When a CPU enters an idle lower-power state or is powering off, we
need to mask SDE events so that no events can be delivered while we
are messing with the MMU as the registered entry points won't be valid.
If the system reboots, we want to unregister all events and mask the CPUs.
For kexec this allows us to hand a clean slate to the next kernel
instead of relying on it to call sdei_{private,system}_data_reset().
For hibernate we unregister all events and re-register them on restore,
in case we restored with the SDE code loaded at a different address.
(e.g. KASLR).
Add all the notifiers necessary to do this. We only support shared events
so all events are left registered and enabled over CPU hotplug.
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
[catalin.marinas@arm.com: added CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED case]
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
The Software Delegated Exception Interface (SDEI) is an ARM standard
for registering callbacks from the platform firmware into the OS.
This is typically used to implement firmware notifications (such as
firmware-first RAS) or promote an IRQ that has been promoted to a
firmware-assisted NMI.
Add the code for detecting the SDEI version and the framework for
registering and unregistering events. Subsequent patches will add the
arch-specific backend code and the necessary power management hooks.
Only shared events are supported, power management, private events and
discovery for ACPI systems will be added by later patches.
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
Pierre Gondois
James Morse
Xiongfeng Wang
Nicolas Saenz Julienne
Wei Yongjun