aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2023-09-23cpufreq: Fix the race condition while updating the transition_task of policyLiao Chang
[ Upstream commit 61bfbf7951ba561dcbdd5357702d3cbc2d447812 ] The field 'transition_task' of policy structure is used to track the task which is performing the frequency transition. Using this field to print a warning once detect a case where the same task is calling _begin() again before completing the preivous frequency transition via the _end(). However, there is a potential race condition in _end() and _begin() APIs while updating the field 'transition_task' of policy, the scenario is depicted below: Task A Task B /* 1st freq transition */ Invoke _begin() { ... ... } /* 2nd freq transition */ Invoke _begin() { ... //waiting for A to ... //clear ... //transition_ongoing ... //in _end() for ... //the 1st transition | Change the frequency | | Invoke _end() { | ... | ... | transition_ongoing = false; V transition_ongoing = true; transition_task = current; transition_task = NULL; ... //A overwrites the task ... //performing the transition ... //result in error warning. } To fix this race condition, the transition_lock of policy structure is now acquired before updating policy structure in _end() API. Which ensure that only one task can update the 'transition_task' field at a time. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/b3c61d8a-d52d-3136-fbf0-d1de9f1ba411@huawei.com/ Fixes: ca654dc3a93d ("cpufreq: Catch double invocations of cpufreq_freq_transition_begin/end") Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-01-18cpufreq: Init completion before kobject_init_and_add()Yongqiang Liu
commit 5c51054896bcce1d33d39fead2af73fec24f40b6 upstream. In cpufreq_policy_alloc(), it will call uninitialed completion in cpufreq_sysfs_release() when kobject_init_and_add() fails. And that will cause a crash such as the following page fault in complete: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffffffffffff8 [..] RIP: 0010:complete+0x98/0x1f0 [..] Call Trace: kobject_put+0x1be/0x4c0 cpufreq_online.cold+0xee/0x1fd cpufreq_add_dev+0x183/0x1e0 subsys_interface_register+0x3f5/0x4e0 cpufreq_register_driver+0x3b7/0x670 acpi_cpufreq_init+0x56c/0x1000 [acpi_cpufreq] do_one_initcall+0x13d/0x780 do_init_module+0x1c3/0x630 load_module+0x6e67/0x73b0 __do_sys_finit_module+0x181/0x240 do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd Fixes: 4ebe36c94aed ("cpufreq: Fix kobject memleak") Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13@huawei.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: 5.2+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.2+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-06-14Revert "cpufreq: Fix possible race in cpufreq online error path"Viresh Kumar
[ Upstream commit 85f0e42bd65d01b351d561efb38e584d4c596553 ] This reverts commit f346e96267cd76175d6c201b40f770c0116a8a04. The commit tried to fix a possible real bug but it made it even worse. The fix was simply buggy as now an error out to out_offline_policy or out_exit_policy will try to release a semaphore which was never taken in the first place. This works fine only if we failed late, i.e. via out_destroy_policy. Fixes: f346e96267cd ("cpufreq: Fix possible race in cpufreq online error path") Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2022-06-14cpufreq: Fix possible race in cpufreq online error pathSchspa Shi
[ Upstream commit f346e96267cd76175d6c201b40f770c0116a8a04 ] When cpufreq online fails, the policy->cpus mask is not cleared and policy->rwsem is released too early, so the driver can be invoked via the cpuinfo_cur_freq sysfs attribute while its ->offline() or ->exit() callbacks are being run. Take policy->clk as an example: static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu) { ... // policy->cpus != 0 at this time down_write(&policy->rwsem); ret = cpufreq_add_dev_interface(policy); up_write(&policy->rwsem); return 0; out_destroy_policy: for_each_cpu(j, policy->real_cpus) remove_cpu_dev_symlink(policy, get_cpu_device(j)); up_write(&policy->rwsem); ... out_exit_policy: if (cpufreq_driver->exit) cpufreq_driver->exit(policy); clk_put(policy->clk); // policy->clk is a wild pointer ... ^ | Another process access __cpufreq_get cpufreq_verify_current_freq cpufreq_generic_get // acces wild pointer of policy->clk; | | out_offline_policy: | cpufreq_policy_free(policy); | // deleted here, and will wait for no body reference cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(policy); } Address this by modifying cpufreq_online() to release policy->rwsem in the error path after the driver callbacks have run and to clear policy->cpus before releasing the semaphore. Fixes: 7106e02baed4 ("cpufreq: release policy->rwsem on error") Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2022-01-27cpufreq: Fix initialization of min and max frequency QoS requestsRafael J. Wysocki
[ Upstream commit 521223d8b3ec078f670c7c35a1a04b1b2af07966 ] The min and max frequency QoS requests in the cpufreq core are initialized to whatever the current min and max frequency values are at the init time, but if any of these values change later (for example, cpuinfo.max_freq is updated by the driver), these initial request values will be limiting the CPU frequency unnecessarily unless they are changed by user space via sysfs. To address this, initialize min_freq_req and max_freq_req to FREQ_QOS_MIN_DEFAULT_VALUE and FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE, respectively, so they don't really limit anything until user space updates them. Reported-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-12-08cpufreq: Fix get_cpu_device() failure in add_cpu_dev_symlink()Xiongfeng Wang
commit 2c1b5a84669d2477d8fffe9136e86a2cff591729 upstream. When I hot added a CPU, I found 'cpufreq' directory was not created below /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/. It is because get_cpu_device() failed in add_cpu_dev_symlink(). cpufreq_add_dev() is the .add_dev callback of a CPU subsys interface. It will be called when the CPU device registered into the system. The call chain is as follows: register_cpu() ->device_register() ->device_add() ->bus_probe_device() ->cpufreq_add_dev() But only after the CPU device has been registered, we can get the CPU device by get_cpu_device(), otherwise it will return NULL. Since we already have the CPU device in cpufreq_add_dev(), pass it to add_cpu_dev_symlink(). I noticed that the 'kobj' of the CPU device has been added into the system before cpufreq_add_dev(). Fixes: 2f0ba790df51 ("cpufreq: Fix creation of symbolic links to policy directories") Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-07-14cpufreq: Make cpufreq_online() call driver->offline() on errorsRafael J. Wysocki
[ Upstream commit 3b7180573c250eb6e2a7eec54ae91f27472332ea ] In the CPU removal path the ->offline() callback provided by the driver is always invoked before ->exit(), but in the cpufreq_online() error path it is not, so ->exit() is expected to somehow know the context in which it has been called and act accordingly. That is less than straightforward, so make cpufreq_online() invoke the driver's ->offline() callback, if present, on errors before ->exit() too. This only potentially affects intel_pstate. Fixes: 91a12e91dc39 ("cpufreq: Allow light-weight tear down and bring up of CPUs") Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-08-19cpufreq: Fix locking issues with governorsViresh Kumar
commit 8cc46ae565c393f77417cb9530b1265eb50f5d2e upstream. The locking around governors handling isn't adequate currently. The list of governors should never be traversed without the locking in place. Also governor modules must not be removed while the code in them is still in use. Reported-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> [ rjw: Changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-06-17cpufreq: Fix up cpufreq_boost_set_sw()Rafael J. Wysocki
commit 552abb884e97d26589964e5a8c7e736f852f95f0 upstream. After commit 18c49926c4bf ("cpufreq: Add QoS requests for userspace constraints") the return value of freq_qos_update_request(), that can be 1, passed by cpufreq_boost_set_sw() to its caller sometimes confuses the latter, which only expects to see 0 or negative error codes, so notice that cpufreq_boost_set_sw() can return an error code (which should not be -EINVAL for that matter) as soon as the first policy without a frequency table is found (because either all policies have a frequency table or none of them have it) and rework it to meet its caller's expectations. Fixes: 18c49926c4bf ("cpufreq: Add QoS requests for userspace constraints") Reported-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reported-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: 5.3+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.3+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-03-05cpufreq: Fix policy initialization for internal governor driversRafael J. Wysocki
commit f5739cb0b56590d68d8df8a44659893b6d0084c3 upstream. Before commit 1e4f63aecb53 ("cpufreq: Avoid creating excessively large stack frames") the initial value of the policy field in struct cpufreq_policy set by the driver's ->init() callback was implicitly passed from cpufreq_init_policy() to cpufreq_set_policy() if the default governor was neither "performance" nor "powersave". After that commit, however, cpufreq_init_policy() must take that case into consideration explicitly and handle it as appropriate, so make that happen. Fixes: 1e4f63aecb53 ("cpufreq: Avoid creating excessively large stack frames") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/39fb762880c27da110086741315ca8b111d781cd.camel@gmail.com/ Reported-by: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-02-11cpufreq: Avoid creating excessively large stack framesRafael J. Wysocki
commit 1e4f63aecb53e48468661e922fc2fa3b83e55722 upstream. In the process of modifying a cpufreq policy, the cpufreq core makes a copy of it including all of the internals which is stored on the CPU stack. Because struct cpufreq_policy is relatively large, this may cause the size of the stack frame to exceed the 2 KB limit and so the GCC complains when -Wframe-larger-than= is used. In fact, it is not necessary to copy the entire policy structure in order to modify it, however. First, because cpufreq_set_policy() obtains the min and max policy limits from frequency QoS now, it is not necessary to pass the limits to it from the callers. The only things that need to be passed to it from there are the new governor pointer or (if there is a built-in governor in the driver) the "policy" value representing the governor choice. They both can be passed as individual arguments, though, so make cpufreq_set_policy() take them this way and rework its callers accordingly. This avoids making copies of cpufreq policies in the callers of cpufreq_set_policy(). Second, cpufreq_set_policy() still needs to pass the new policy data to the ->verify() callback of the cpufreq driver whose task is to sanitize the min and max policy limits. It still does not need to make a full copy of struct cpufreq_policy for this purpose, but it needs to pass a few items from it to the driver in case they are needed (different drivers have different needs in that respect and all of them have to be covered). For this reason, introduce struct cpufreq_policy_data to hold copies of the members of struct cpufreq_policy used by the existing ->verify() driver callbacks and pass a pointer to a temporary structure of that type to ->verify() (instead of passing a pointer to full struct cpufreq_policy to it). While at it, notice that intel_pstate and longrun don't really need to verify the "policy" value in struct cpufreq_policy, so drop those check from them to avoid copying "policy" into struct cpufreq_policy_data (which allows it to be slightly smaller). Also while at it fix up white space in a couple of places and make cpufreq_set_policy() static (as it can be so). Fixes: 3000ce3c52f8 ("cpufreq: Use per-policy frequency QoS") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/CAMuHMdX6-jb1W8uC2_237m8ctCpsnGp=JCxqt8pCWVqNXHmkVg@mail.gmail.com Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-12-31cpufreq: Register drivers only after CPU devices have been registeredViresh Kumar
[ Upstream commit 46770be0cf94149ca48be87719bda1d951066644 ] The cpufreq core heavily depends on the availability of the struct device for CPUs and if they aren't available at the time cpufreq driver is registered, we will never succeed in making cpufreq work. This happens due to following sequence of events: - cpufreq_register_driver() - subsys_interface_register() - return 0; //successful registration of driver ... at a later point of time - register_cpu(); - device_register(); - bus_probe_device(); - sif->add_dev(); - cpufreq_add_dev(); - get_cpu_device(); //FAILS - per_cpu(cpu_sys_devices, num) = &cpu->dev; //used by get_cpu_device() - return 0; //CPU registered successfully Because the per-cpu variable cpu_sys_devices is set only after the CPU device is regsitered, cpufreq will never be able to get it when cpufreq_add_dev() is called. This patch avoids this failure by making sure device structure of at least CPU0 is available when the cpufreq driver is registered, else return -EPROBE_DEFER. Reported-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> Co-developed-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2019-11-29cpufreq: Add NULL checks to show() and store() methods of cpufreqKai Shen
commit e6e8df07268c1f75dd9215536e2ce4587b70f977 upstream. Add NULL checks to show() and store() in cpufreq.c to avoid attempts to invoke a NULL callback. Though some interfaces of cpufreq are set as read-only, users can still get write permission using chmod which can lead to a kernel crash, as follows: chmod +w /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq This bug was found in linux 4.19. Signed-off-by: Kai Shen <shenkai8@huawei.com> Reported-by: Feilong Lin <linfeilong@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Feilong Lin <linfeilong@huawei.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ rjw: Subject & changelog ] Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-10-22cpufreq: Cancel policy update work scheduled before freeingSudeep Holla
Scheduled policy update work may end up racing with the freeing of the policy and unregistering the driver. One possible race is as below, where the cpufreq_driver is unregistered, but the scheduled work gets executed at later stage when, cpufreq_driver is NULL (i.e. after freeing the policy and driver). Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000001c pgd = (ptrval) [0000001c] *pgd=80000080204003, *pmd=00000000 Internal error: Oops: 206 [#1] SMP THUMB2 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 34 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.4.0-rc3-00006-g67f5a8081a4b #86 Hardware name: ARM-Versatile Express Workqueue: events handle_update PC is at cpufreq_set_policy+0x58/0x228 LR is at dev_pm_qos_read_value+0x77/0xac Control: 70c5387d Table: 80203000 DAC: fffffffd Process kworker/0:1 (pid: 34, stack limit = 0x(ptrval)) (cpufreq_set_policy) from (refresh_frequency_limits.part.24+0x37/0x48) (refresh_frequency_limits.part.24) from (handle_update+0x2f/0x38) (handle_update) from (process_one_work+0x16d/0x3cc) (process_one_work) from (worker_thread+0xff/0x414) (worker_thread) from (kthread+0xff/0x100) (kthread) from (ret_from_fork+0x11/0x28) Fixes: 67d874c3b2c6 ("cpufreq: Register notifiers with the PM QoS framework") Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> [ rjw: Cancel the work before dropping the QoS requests ] Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-10-21cpufreq: Use per-policy frequency QoSRafael J. Wysocki
Replace the CPU device PM QoS used for the management of min and max frequency constraints in cpufreq (and its users) with per-policy frequency QoS to avoid problems with cpufreq policies covering more then one CPU. Namely, a cpufreq driver is registered with the subsys interface which calls cpufreq_add_dev() for each CPU, starting from CPU0, so currently the PM QoS notifiers are added to the first CPU in the policy (i.e. CPU0 in the majority of cases). In turn, when the cpufreq driver is unregistered, the subsys interface doing that calls cpufreq_remove_dev() for each CPU, starting from CPU0, and the PM QoS notifiers are only removed when cpufreq_remove_dev() is called for the last CPU in the policy, say CPUx, which as a rule is not CPU0 if the policy covers more than one CPU. Then, the PM QoS notifiers cannot be removed, because CPUx does not have them, and they are still there in the device PM QoS notifiers list of CPU0, which prevents new PM QoS notifiers from being registered for CPU0 on the next attempt to register the cpufreq driver. The same issue occurs when the first CPU in the policy goes offline before unregistering the driver. After this change it does not matter which CPU is the policy CPU at the driver registration time and whether or not it is online all the time, because the frequency QoS is per policy and not per CPU. Fixes: 67d874c3b2c6 ("cpufreq: Register notifiers with the PM QoS framework") Reported-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> Reported-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Diagnosed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/5ad2624194baa2f53acc1f1e627eb7684c577a19.1562210705.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/T/#md2d89e95906b8c91c15f582146173dce2e86e99f Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20191017094612.6tbkwoq4harsjcqv@vireshk-i7/T/#m30d48cc23b9a80467fbaa16e30f90b3828a5a29b Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-10-10cpufreq: Avoid cpufreq_suspend() deadlock on system shutdownRafael J. Wysocki
It is incorrect to set the cpufreq syscore shutdown callback pointer to cpufreq_suspend(), because that function cannot be run in the syscore stage of system shutdown for two reasons: (a) it may attempt to carry out actions depending on devices that have already been shut down at that point and (b) the RCU synchronization carried out by it may not be able to make progress then. The latter issue has been present since commit 45975c7d21a1 ("rcu: Define RCU-sched API in terms of RCU for Tree RCU PREEMPT builds"), but the former one has been there since commit 90de2a4aa9f3 ("cpufreq: suspend cpufreq governors on shutdown") regardless. Fix that by dropping cpufreq_syscore_ops altogether and making device_shutdown() call cpufreq_suspend() directly before shutting down devices, which is along the lines of what system-wide power management does. Fixes: 45975c7d21a1 ("rcu: Define RCU-sched API in terms of RCU for Tree RCU PREEMPT builds") Fixes: 90de2a4aa9f3 ("cpufreq: suspend cpufreq governors on shutdown") Reported-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: 4.0+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.0+
2019-09-05Merge branch 'pm-cpufreq-qos'Rafael J. Wysocki
* pm-cpufreq-qos: Documentation: cpufreq: Update policy notifier documentation cpufreq: Remove CPUFREQ_ADJUST and CPUFREQ_NOTIFY policy notifier events ACPI: cpufreq: Switch to QoS requests instead of cpufreq notifier video: pxafb: Remove cpufreq policy notifier video: sa1100fb: Remove cpufreq policy notifier arch_topology: Use CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY instead of CPUFREQ_NOTIFY cpufreq: powerpc_cbe: Switch to QoS requests for freq limits cpufreq: powerpc: macintosh: Switch to QoS requests for freq limits thermal: cpu_cooling: Switch to QoS requests for freq limits cpufreq: Add policy create/remove notifiers back
2019-09-02cpufreq: Remove CPUFREQ_ADJUST and CPUFREQ_NOTIFY policy notifier eventsViresh Kumar
No driver makes reference to these events now, remove them and the code related to them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-08-22cpufreq: Print driver name if cpufreq_suspend() failsFlorian Fainelli
Instead of printing the policy, which is incidentally a kernel pointer, so with limited interest, print the cpufreq driver name that failed to be suspend, which is more useful for debugging. Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-08-21cpufreq: remove redundant assignment to retColin Ian King
Variable ret is initialized to a value that is never read and it is re-assigned later. The initialization is redundant and can be removed. Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-08-10cpufreq: Add policy create/remove notifiers backViresh Kumar
This effectively reverts some changes made by commit f9f41e3ef99 ("cpufreq: Remove policy create/remove notifiers"). We have a new use case for policy create/remove notifiers (for allocating/freeing QoS requests per policy), so add them back. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ rjw: Subject & changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-08-10cpufreq: dev_pm_qos_update_request() can return 1 on successViresh Kumar
dev_pm_qos_update_request() can return 1 on success, so don't treat it as an error. Fixes: 18c49926c4bf ("cpufreq: Add QoS requests for userspace constraints") Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-07-18Merge branch 'pm-cpufreq'Rafael J. Wysocki
* pm-cpufreq: cpufreq: Make cpufreq_generic_init() return void cpufreq: imx-cpufreq-dt: Add i.MX8MN support cpufreq: Add QoS requests for userspace constraints cpufreq: intel_pstate: Reuse refresh_frequency_limits() cpufreq: Register notifiers with the PM QoS framework PM / QoS: Add support for MIN/MAX frequency constraints PM / QOS: Pass request type to dev_pm_qos_read_value() PM / QOS: Rename __dev_pm_qos_read_value() and dev_pm_qos_raw_read_value() PM / QOS: Pass request type to dev_pm_qos_{add|remove}_notifier()
2019-07-16cpufreq: Make cpufreq_generic_init() return voidViresh Kumar
It always returns 0 (success) and its return type should really be void. Over that, many drivers have added error handling code based on its return value, which is not required at all. Change its return type to void and update all the callers. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-07-08cpufreq: Add QoS requests for userspace constraintsViresh Kumar
This implements QoS requests to manage userspace configuration of min and max frequency. Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: syzbot <syzbot+de771ae9390dffed7266@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-07-08cpufreq: intel_pstate: Reuse refresh_frequency_limits()Viresh Kumar
The implementation of intel_pstate_update_max_freq() is quite similar to refresh_frequency_limits(), lets reuse it. Finding minimum of policy->user_policy.max and policy->cpuinfo.max_freq in intel_pstate_update_max_freq() is redundant as cpufreq_set_policy() will call the ->verify() callback of intel-pstate driver, which will do this comparison anyway and so dropping it from intel_pstate_update_max_freq() doesn't harm. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-07-08cpufreq: Register notifiers with the PM QoS frameworkViresh Kumar
Register notifiers for min/max frequency constraints with the PM QoS framework. The constraints are also taken into consideration in cpufreq_set_policy(). This also relocates cpufreq_policy_put_kobj() as it is required to be called from cpufreq_policy_alloc() now. refresh_frequency_limits() is updated to avoid calling cpufreq_set_policy() for inactive policies and handle_update() is updated to have proper locking in place. No constraints are added until now though. Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-07-08Merge branch 'pm-cpufreq'Rafael J. Wysocki
* pm-cpufreq: cpufreq: Avoid calling cpufreq_verify_current_freq() from handle_update() cpufreq: Consolidate cpufreq_update_current_freq() and __cpufreq_get() cpufreq: Don't skip frequency validation for has_target() drivers cpufreq: Use has_target() instead of !setpolicy cpufreq: Remove redundant !setpolicy check cpufreq: Move the IS_ENABLED(CPU_THERMAL) macro into a stub cpufreq: s5pv210: Don't flood kernel log after cpufreq change cpufreq: pcc-cpufreq: Fail initialization if driver cannot be registered cpufreq: add driver for Raspberry Pi cpufreq: Switch imx7d to imx-cpufreq-dt for speed grading cpufreq: imx-cpufreq-dt: Remove global platform match list cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: Fix types for voltage/frequency cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: Fix initial command check cpufreq: armada-37xx: Remove set but not used variable 'freq' cpufreq: imx-cpufreq-dt: Fix no OPPs available on unfused parts dt-bindings: imx-cpufreq-dt: Document opp-supported-hw usage cpufreq: Add imx-cpufreq-dt driver
2019-06-28cpufreq: Avoid calling cpufreq_verify_current_freq() from handle_update()Viresh Kumar
On some occasions cpufreq_verify_current_freq() schedules a work whose callback is handle_update(), which further calls cpufreq_update_policy() which may end up calling cpufreq_verify_current_freq() again. On the other hand, when cpufreq_update_policy() is called from handle_update(), the pointer to the cpufreq policy is already available, but cpufreq_cpu_acquire() is still called to get it in cpufreq_update_policy(), which should be avoided as well. To fix these issues, create a new helper, refresh_frequency_limits(), and make both handle_update() call it cpufreq_update_policy(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ rjw: Rename reeval_frequency_limits() as refresh_frequency_limits() ] [ rjw: Changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-06-28cpufreq: Consolidate cpufreq_update_current_freq() and __cpufreq_get()Viresh Kumar
Their implementations are quite similar, so modify cpufreq_update_current_freq() somewhat and call it from __cpufreq_get(). Also rename cpufreq_update_current_freq() to cpufreq_verify_current_freq(), as that's what it is doing. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ rjw: Subject & changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-06-28cpufreq: Don't skip frequency validation for has_target() driversViresh Kumar
CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS was introduced in a very old commit from pre-2.6 kernel release by commit 6a4a93f9c0d5 ("[CPUFREQ] Fix 'out of sync' issue"). Basically, that commit does two things: - It adds the frequency verification code (which is quite similar to what we have today as well). - And it sets the CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS flag only for setpolicy drivers, rightly so based on the code we had then. The idea was to avoid frequency validation for setpolicy drivers as the cpufreq core doesn't know what frequency the hardware is running at and so no point in doing frequency verification. The problem happened when we started to use the same CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS flag for constant loops-per-jiffy thing as well and many has_target() drivers started using the same flag and unknowingly skipped the verification of frequency. There is no logical reason behind skipping frequency validation because of the presence of CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS flag otherwise. Fix this issue by skipping frequency validation only for setpolicy drivers and always doing it for has_target() drivers irrespective of the presence or absence of CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS flag. cpufreq_notify_transition() is only called for has_target() type driver and not for set_policy type, and the check is simply redundant. Remove it as well. Also remove () around freq comparison statement as they aren't required and checkpatch also warns for them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-06-26cpufreq: Use has_target() instead of !setpolicyViresh Kumar
For code consistency, use has_target() instead of !setpolicy everywhere, as it is already done at several places. Maybe we should also use "!has_target()" instead of "cpufreq_driver->setpolicy" where we need to check if the driver supports setpolicy, so to use only one expression for this kind of differentiation. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-06-26cpufreq: Remove redundant !setpolicy checkViresh Kumar
cpufreq_start_governor() is only called for !setpolicy case, checking it again is not required. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-06-26cpufreq: Move the IS_ENABLED(CPU_THERMAL) macro into a stubDaniel Lezcano
cpufreq_online() and cpufreq_offline() [un]register the driver as a cooling device. This is done if the driver is flagged as a cooling device in addition with an IS_ENABLED() check to compile out the branching code. Group this test in a stub function added in the cpufreq header instead of having the IS_ENABLED() in the code. Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-06-19treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 500Thomas Gleixner
Based on 2 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as published by the free software foundation this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as published by the free software foundation # extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 4122 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net> Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604081206.933168790@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-15Merge tag 'pm-5.2-rc1-2' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm Pull more power management updates from Rafael Wysocki: "These fix a recent regression causing kernels built with CONFIG_PM unset to crash on systems that support the Performance and Energy Bias Hint (EPB), clean up the cpufreq core and some users of transition notifiers and introduce a new power domain flag into the generic power domains framework (genpd). Specifics: - Fix recent regression causing kernels built with CONFIG_PM unset to crash on systems that support the Performance and Energy Bias Hint (EPB) by avoiding to compile the EPB-related code depending on CONFIG_PM when it is unset (Rafael Wysocki). - Clean up the transition notifier invocation code in the cpufreq core and change some users of cpufreq transition notifiers accordingly (Viresh Kumar). - Change MAINTAINERS to cover the schedutil governor as part of cpufreq (Viresh Kumar). - Simplify cpufreq_init_policy() to avoid redundant computations (Yue Hu). - Add explanatory comment to the cpufreq core (Rafael Wysocki). - Introduce a new flag, GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON, to the generic power domains (genpd) framework along with the first user of it (Leonard Crestez)" * tag 'pm-5.2-rc1-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm: soc: imx: gpc: Use GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON for ERR009619 PM / Domains: Add GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON flag cpufreq: Update MAINTAINERS to include schedutil governor cpufreq: Don't find governor for setpolicy drivers in cpufreq_init_policy() cpufreq: Explain the kobject_put() in cpufreq_policy_alloc() cpufreq: Call transition notifier only once for each policy x86: intel_epb: Take CONFIG_PM into account
2019-05-13cpufreq: Don't find governor for setpolicy drivers in cpufreq_init_policy()Yue Hu
In cpufreq_init_policy() we will check if there's last_governor for target and setpolicy type. However last_governor is set only if has_target() is true in cpufreq_offline(). That means find last_governor for setpolicy type is pointless. Also new_policy.governor will not be used if ->setpolicy callback is set in cpufreq_set_policy(). Moreover, there's duplicate ->setpolicy check in using default policy path. Let's add a new helper function to avoid it. Also update comments. Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@yulong.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-05-13cpufreq: Explain the kobject_put() in cpufreq_policy_alloc()Rafael J. Wysocki
It may not be particularly clear why the kobject_put() after failing kobject_init_and_add() in cpufreq_policy_alloc() is not redundant, so add a comment to explain that. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-05-10cpufreq: Call transition notifier only once for each policyViresh Kumar
Currently, the notifiers are called once for each CPU of the policy->cpus cpumask. It would be more optimal if the notifier can be called only once and all the relevant information be provided to it. Out of the 23 drivers that register for the transition notifiers today, only 4 of them do per-cpu updates and the callback for the rest can be called only once for the policy without any impact. This would also avoid multiple function calls to the notifier callbacks and reduce multiple iterations of notifier core's code (which does locking as well). This patch adds pointer to the cpufreq policy to the struct cpufreq_freqs, so the notifier callback has all the information available to it with a single call. The five drivers which perform per-cpu updates are updated to use the cpufreq policy. The freqs->cpu field is redundant now and is removed. Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> (sparc) Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-05-07Merge tag 'printk-for-5.2' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pmladek/printk Pull printk updates from Petr Mladek: - Allow state reset of printk_once() calls. - Prevent crashes when dereferencing invalid pointers in vsprintf(). Only the first byte is checked for simplicity. - Make vsprintf warnings consistent and inlined. - Treewide conversion of obsolete %pf, %pF to %ps, %pF printf modifiers. - Some clean up of vsprintf and test_printf code. * tag 'printk-for-5.2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pmladek/printk: lib/vsprintf: Make function pointer_string static vsprintf: Limit the length of inlined error messages vsprintf: Avoid confusion between invalid address and value vsprintf: Prevent crash when dereferencing invalid pointers vsprintf: Consolidate handling of unknown pointer specifiers vsprintf: Factor out %pO handler as kobject_string() vsprintf: Factor out %pV handler as va_format() vsprintf: Factor out %p[iI] handler as ip_addr_string() vsprintf: Do not check address of well-known strings vsprintf: Consistent %pK handling for kptr_restrict == 0 vsprintf: Shuffle restricted_pointer() printk: Tie printk_once / printk_deferred_once into .data.once for reset treewide: Switch printk users from %pf and %pF to %ps and %pS, respectively lib/test_printf: Switch to bitmap_zalloc()
2019-04-30cpufreq: Fix kobject memleakViresh Kumar
Currently the error return path from kobject_init_and_add() is not followed by a call to kobject_put() - which means we are leaking the kobject. Fix it by adding a call to kobject_put() in the error path of kobject_init_and_add(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Tobin C. Harding <tobin@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-04-23cpufreq: Move ->get callback check outside of __cpufreq_get()Yue Hu
Currenly, __cpufreq_get() called by show_cpuinfo_cur_freq() will check ->get callback. That is needless since cpuinfo_cur_freq attribute will not be created if ->get is not set. So let's drop it in __cpufreq_get(). Also keep this check in cpufreq_get(). Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@yulong.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-04-16cpufreq: Remove needless bios_limit check in show_bios_limit()Yue Hu
Initially, bios_limit attribute will be created if driver->bios_limit is set in cpufreq_add_dev_interface(). So remove the redundant check for latter show operation. Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@yulong.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-04-09treewide: Switch printk users from %pf and %pF to %ps and %pS, respectivelySakari Ailus
%pF and %pf are functionally equivalent to %pS and %ps conversion specifiers. The former are deprecated, therefore switch the current users to use the preferred variant. The changes have been produced by the following command: git grep -l '%p[fF]' | grep -v '^\(tools\|Documentation\)/' | \ while read i; do perl -i -pe 's/%pf/%ps/g; s/%pF/%pS/g;' $i; done And verifying the result. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190325193229.23390-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> (for btrfs) Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> (for mm/memblock.c) Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> (for drivers/pci) Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
2019-04-09cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_driver check in cpufreq_boost_supported()Yue Hu
Currently there are three calling paths for cpufreq_boost_supported() in all as below, we can see the cpufreq_driver null check is needless since it is already checked before. <path1> cpufreq_enable_boost_support() |-> if (!cpufreq_driver) |-> cpufreq_boost_supported() <path2> cpufreq_register_driver() |-> if (!driver_data ... |-> cpufreq_driver = driver_data |-> cpufreq_boost_supported() |-> remove_boost_sysfs_file() |-> cpufreq_boost_supported() <path3> cpufreq_unregister_driver() |-> if (!cpufreq_driver ... |-> remove_boost_sysfs_file() |-> cpufreq_boost_supported() Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@yulong.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-04-08cpufreq: intel_pstate: Update max frequency on global turbo changesRafael J. Wysocki
While the cpuinfo.max_freq value doesn't really matter for intel_pstate in the active mode, in the passive mode it is used by governors as the maximum physical frequency of the CPU and the results of governor computations generally depend on it. Also it is made available to user space via sysfs and it should match the current HW configuration. For this reason, make intel_pstate update cpuinfo.max_freq for all CPUs if it detects a global change of turbo frequency settings from "disable" to "enable" or the other way associated with a _PPC change notification from the platform firmware. Note that policy_is_inactive(), cpufreq_cpu_acquire(), cpufreq_cpu_release(), and cpufreq_set_policy() need to be made available to it for this purpose. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200759 Reported-by: Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com> Tested-by: Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-04-01cpufreq: Add cpufreq_cpu_acquire() and cpufreq_cpu_release()Rafael J. Wysocki
It sometimes is necessary to find a cpufreq policy for a given CPU and acquire its rwsem (for writing) immediately after that, so introduce cpufreq_cpu_acquire() as a helper for that and the complementary cpufreq_cpu_release(). Make cpufreq_update_policy() use the new functions. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-04-01cpufreq: intel_pstate: Driver-specific handling of _PPC updatesRafael J. Wysocki
In some cases, the platform firmware disables or enables turbo frequencies for all CPUs globally before triggering a _PPC change notification for one of them. Obviously, that global change affects all CPUs, not just the notified one, and it needs to be acted upon by cpufreq. The intel_pstate driver is able to detect such global changes of the settings, but it also needs to update policy limits for all CPUs if that happens, in particular if turbo frequencies are enabled globally - to allow them to be used. For this reason, introduce a new cpufreq driver callback to be invoked on _PPC notifications, if present, instead of simply calling cpufreq_update_policy() for the notified CPU and make intel_pstate use it to trigger policy updates for all CPUs in the system if global settings change. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200759 Reported-by: Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com> Tested-by: Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-03-07cpufreq: Improve kerneldoc comments for cpufreq_cpu_get/put()Rafael J. Wysocki
Fix the formatting of the cpufreq_cpu_get() and cpufreq_cpu_put() kerneldoc comments and rework them to be somewhat easier to follow. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-02-20cpufreq: Pass updated policy to driver ->setpolicy() callbackRafael J. Wysocki
The invocation of the ->setpolicy() cpufreq driver callback should be equivalent to calling cpufreq_governor_limits(policy) for drivers with internal governors, but in fact it isn't so, because the temporary new_policy object is passed to it instead of the updated policy. That is a bit confusing, so make cpufreq_set_policy() pass the updated policy to the driver ->setpolicy() callback. No intentional changes of behavior. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>