aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpe.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-07-26ACPICA: Clear status of GPEs on first direct enableRafael J. Wysocki
[ Upstream commit 44758bafa53602f2581a6857bb20b55d4d8ad5b2 ] ACPI GPEs (other than the EC one) can be enabled in two situations. First, the GPEs with existing _Lxx and _Exx methods are enabled implicitly by ACPICA during system initialization. Second, the GPEs without these methods (like GPEs listed by _PRW objects for wakeup devices) need to be enabled directly by the code that is going to use them (e.g. ACPI power management or device drivers). In the former case, if the status of a given GPE is set to start with, its handler method (either _Lxx or _Exx) needs to be invoked to take care of the events (possibly) signaled before the GPE was enabled. In the latter case, however, the first caller of acpi_enable_gpe() for a given GPE should not be expected to care about any events that might be signaled through it earlier. In that case, it is better to clear the status of the GPE before enabling it, to prevent stale events from triggering unwanted actions (like spurious system resume, for example). For this reason, modify acpi_ev_add_gpe_reference() to take an additional boolean argument indicating whether or not the GPE status needs to be cleared when its reference counter changes from zero to one and make acpi_enable_gpe() pass TRUE to it through that new argument. Fixes: 18996f2db918 ("ACPICA: Events: Stop unconditionally clearing ACPI IRQs during suspend/resume") Reported-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2019-05-04Revert "ACPICA: Clear status of GPEs before enabling them"Rafael J. Wysocki
commit 2c2a2fb1e2a9256714338875bede6b7cbd4b9542 upstream. Revert commit c8b1917c8987 ("ACPICA: Clear status of GPEs before enabling them") that causes problems with Thunderbolt controllers to occur if a dock device is connected at init time (the xhci_hcd and thunderbolt modules crash which prevents peripherals connected through them from working). Commit c8b1917c8987 effectively causes commit ecc1165b8b74 ("ACPICA: Dispatch active GPEs at init time") to get undone, so the problem addressed by commit ecc1165b8b74 appears again as a result of it. Fixes: c8b1917c8987 ("ACPICA: Clear status of GPEs before enabling them") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/s5hy33siofw.wl-tiwai@suse.de/T/#u Link: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1132943 Reported-by: Michael Hirmke <opensuse@mike.franken.de> Reported-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Cc: 4.17+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.17+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-04-17ACPICA: Clear status of GPEs before enabling themFurquan Shaikh
commit c8b1917c8987a6fa3695d479b4d60fbbbc3e537b upstream. Commit 18996f2db918 ("ACPICA: Events: Stop unconditionally clearing ACPI IRQs during suspend/resume") was added to stop clearing event status bits unconditionally in the system-wide suspend and resume paths. This was done because of an issue with a laptop lid appaering to be closed even when it was used to wake up the system from suspend (see https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196249), which happened because event status bits were cleared unconditionally on system resume. Though this change fixed the issue in the resume path, it introduced regressions in a few suspend paths. First regression was reported and fixed in the S5 entry path by commit fa85015c0d95 ("ACPICA: Clear status of all events when entering S5"). Next regression was reported and fixed for all legacy sleep paths by commit f317c7dc12b7 ("ACPICA: Clear status of all events when entering sleep states"). However, there still is a suspend-to-idle regression, since suspend-to-idle does not follow the legacy sleep paths. In the suspend-to-idle case, wakeup is enabled as part of device suspend. If the status bits of wakeup GPEs are set when they are enabled, it causes a premature system wakeup to occur. To address that problem, partially revert commit 18996f2db918 to restore GPE status bits clearing before the GPE is enabled in acpi_ev_enable_gpe(). Fixes: 18996f2db918 ("ACPICA: Events: Stop unconditionally clearing ACPI IRQs during suspend/resume") Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Cc: 4.17+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.17+ [ rjw: Subject & changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-05-25ACPICA: Introduce acpi_dispatch_gpe()Rafael J. Wysocki
Introduce acpi_dispatch_gpe() as a wrapper around acpi_ev_detect_gpe() for checking if the given GPE (as represented by a GPE device handle and a GPE number) is currently active and dispatching it (if that's the case) outside of interrupt context. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-18ACPICA: adding SPDX headersErik Schmauss
Signed-off-by: Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-18ACPICA: Events: Add parallel GPE handling support to fix potential redundant ↵Erik Schmauss
_Exx evaluations There is a risk that a GPE method/handler may be invoked twice. Let's consider a case, both GPE0(RAW_HANDLER) and GPE1(_Exx) is triggered. =======================================+============================= IRQ handler (top-half) |IRQ polling =======================================+============================= acpi_ev_detect_gpe() | LOCK() | READ (GPE0-7 enable/status registers)| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ROOT CAUSE^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| Walk GPE0 | UNLOCK() |LOCK() Invoke GPE0 RAW_HANDLER |READ (GPE1 enable/status bit) |acpi_ev_gpe_dispatch(irq=false) | CLEAR (GPE1 enable bit) | CLEAR (GPE1 status bit) LOCK() |UNLOCK() Walk GPE1 +============================= acpi_ev_gpe_dispatch(irq=true) |IRQ polling (defer) CLEAR (GPE1 enable bit) +============================= CLEAR (GPE1 status bit) |acpi_ev_async_execute_gpe_method() Walk others | Evaluate GPE1 _Exx fi | acpi_ev_async_enable_gpe() UNLOCK() | LOCK() =======================================+ SET (GPE enable bit) IRQ handler (bottom-half) | UNLOCK() =======================================+ acpi_ev_async_execute_gpe_method() | Evaluate GPE1 _Exx | acpi_ev_async_enable_gpe() | LOCK() | SET (GPE1 enable bit) | UNLOCK() | =======================================+============================= If acpi_ev_detect_gpe() is only invoked from the IRQ context, there won't be more than one _Lxx/_Exx evaluations for one status bit flagging if the IRQ handlers controlled by the underlying IRQ chip/driver (ex. APIC) are run in serial. Note that, this is a known potential gap and we had an approach, locking entire non-raw-handler processes in the top-half IRQ handler and handling all raw-handlers out of the locked loop to be friendly to those IRQ chip/driver. But the approach is too complicated while the issue is not so real, thus ACPICA treated such issue (if any) as a parallelism/quality issue of the underlying IRQ chip/driver to stop putting it on the radar. Bug in link #1 is suspiciously reflecting the same cause, and if so, it can also be fixed by this simpler approach. But it will be no excuse an ACPICA problem now if ACPICA starts to poll IRQs itself. In the changed scenario, _Exx will be evaluated from the task context due to new ACPICA provided "polling after enabling GPEs" mechanism. And the above figure uses edge-triggered GPEs demonstrating the possibility of evaluating _Exx twice for one status bit flagging. As a conclusion, there is now an increased chance of evaluating _Lxx/_Exx more than once for one status bit flagging. However this is still not a real problem if the _Lxx/_Exx checks the underlying hardware IRQ reasoning and finally just changes the 2nd and the follow-up evaluations into no-ops. Note that _Lxx should always be written in this way as a level-trigger GPE could have it's status wrongly duplicated by the underlying IRQ delivery mechanisms. But _Exx may have very low quality BIOS by BIOS to trigger real issues. For example, trigger duplicated button notifications. To solve this issue, we need to stop reading a bunch of enable/status register bits, but read only one GPE's enable/status bit. And GPE status register's W1C nature ensures that acknowledging one GPE won't affect another GPEs' status bits. Thus the hardware GPE architecture has already provided us with the mechanism of implementing such parallelism. So we can lock around one GPE handling process to achieve the parallelism: 1. If we can incorporate GPE enable bit check in detection and ensure the atomicity of the following process (top-half IRQ handler): READ (enable/status bit) if (enabled && raised) CLEAR (enable bit) and handle the GPE after this process, we can ensure that we will only invoke GPE handler once for one status bit flagging. 2. In addtion for edge-triggered GPEs, if we can ensure the atomicity of the following process (top-half IRQ handler): READ (enable/status bit) if (enabled && raised) CLEAR (enable bit) CLEAR (status bit) and handle the GPE after this process, we can ensure that we will only invoke GPE handler once for one status bit flagging. By doing a cleanup in this way, we can remove duplicate GPE handling code and ensure that all logics are collected in 1 function. And the function will be safe for both IRQ interrupt and IRQ polling, and will be safe for us to release and re-acquire acpi_gbl_gpe_lock at any time rather than raw handler only during the top-half IRQ handler. Lv Zheng. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196703 [#1] Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-18ACPICA: Events: Stop unconditionally clearing ACPI IRQs during suspend/resumeErik Schmauss
Unconditionally clearing ACPI IRQs during suspend/resume can lead to unexpected IRQ losts. This patch fixes this issue by removing such IRQ clearing code. If this patch triggers regression, the regression should be in the GPE handlers that cannot correctly determine some spurious triggered events as no-ops. Please report any regression related to this commit to the ACPI component on kernel bugzilla. Lv Zheng. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196249 Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Eric Bakula-Davis <ericbakuladavis@gmail.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-06ACPICA: All acpica: Update copyrights to 2018Bob Moore
including tool signons. Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-10-04ACPICA: Hardware: Enable 64-bit support of hardware accessesLv Zheng
ACPICA commit 6b0a604d171334f61a18bc92b44ec0437b11bf98 This patch enable 64-bit support for acpi_hw_read()/acpi_hw_write() and then convert acpi_read()/acpi_write() to invoke them. BZ 1287, fixed by Lv Zheng. Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/6b0a604d1713 Link: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1287 Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-02-09ACPICA: Source tree: Update copyright notices to 2017Bob Moore
ACPICA commit 16577e5265923f4999b4d2c0addb2343b18135e1 Affects all files. Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/16577e52 Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-08-13ACPICA: Events: Introduce acpi_mask_gpe() to implement GPE masking mechanismLv Zheng
ACPICA commit 23a417ca406a527e7ae1710893e59a8b6db30e14 There is a facility in Linux, developers can control the enabling/disabling of a GPE via /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/gpexx. This is mainly for debugging purposes. But many users expect to use this facility to implement quirks to mask a specific GPE when there is a gap in Linux causing this GPE to flood. This is not working correctly because currently this facility invokes enabling/disabling counting based GPE driver APIs: acpi_enable_gpe()/acpi_disable_gpe() and the GPE drivers can still affect the count to mess up the GPE masking purposes. However, most of the IRQ chip designs allow masking/unmasking IRQs via a masking bit which is different from the enabled bit to achieve the same purpose. But the GPE hardware doesn't contain such a feature, this brings the trouble. In this patch, we introduce a software mechanism to implement the GPE masking feature, and acpi_mask_gpe() are provided to the OSPMs to mask/unmask GPEs in the above mentioned situation instead of acpi_enable_gpe()/acpi_disable_gpe(). ACPICA BZ 1102. Lv Zheng. Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/23a417ca Link: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1102 Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05ACPICA: Divergence: remove unwanted spaces for typedefLv Zheng
ACPICA commit b2294cae776f5a66a7697414b21949d307e6856f This patch removes unwanted spaces for typedef. This solution doesn't cover function types. Note that the linuxize result of this commit is very giant and should have many conflicts against the current Linux upstream. Thus it is required to modify the linuxize result of this commit and the commits around it manually in order to have them merged to the Linux upstream. Since this is very costy, we should do this only once, and if we can't ensure to do this only once, we need to revert the Linux code to the wrong indentation result before merging the linuxize result of this commit. Lv Zheng. Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/b2294cae Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-01-15ACPICA: Additional 2016 copyright changesBob Moore
All tool/utility signons. Dual-license module header. Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-01-01ACPICA: Core: Major update for code formatting, no functional changesBob Moore
ACPICA commit dfa394471f6c01b2ee9433dbc143ec70cb9bca72 Mostly indentation inconsistencies across the code. Split some long lines, etc. Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/dfa39447 Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-04-15ACPICA: Store GPE register enable masks upfrontRafael J. Wysocki
It is reported that ACPI interrupts do not work any more on Dell Latitude D600 after commit c50f13c672df (ACPICA: Save current masks of enabled GPEs after enable register writes). The problem turns out to be related to the fact that the enable_mask and enable_for_run GPE bit masks are not in sync (in the absence of any system suspend/resume events) for at least one GPE register on that machine. Address this problem by writing the enable_for_run mask into enable_mask as soon as enable_for_run is updated instead of doing that only after the subsequent register write has succeeded. For consistency, update acpi_hw_gpe_enable_write() to store the bit mask to be written into the GPE register in enable_mask unconditionally before the write. Since the ACPI_GPE_SAVE_MASK flag is not necessary any more after that, drop it along with the symbols depending on it. Reported-and-tested-by: Jim Bos <jim876@xs4all.nl> Fixes: c50f13c672df (ACPICA: Save current masks of enabled GPEs after enable register writes) Cc: 3.19+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.19+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-02-05ACPICA: Events: Introduce ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_RAW_HANDLER to fix 2 issues for ↵Lv Zheng
the current GPE APIs ACPICA commit 199cad16530a45aea2bec98e528866e20c5927e1 Since whether the GPE should be disabled/enabled/cleared should only be determined by the GPE driver's state machine: 1. GPE should be disabled if the driver wants to switch to the GPE polling mode when a GPE storm condition is indicated and should be enabled if the driver wants to switch back to the GPE interrupt mode when all of the storm conditions are cleared. The conditions should be protected by the driver's specific lock. 2. GPE should be enabled if the driver has accepted more than one request and should be disabled if the driver has completed all of the requests. The request count should be protected by the driver's specific lock. 3. GPE should be cleared either when the driver is about to handle an edge triggered GPE or when the driver has completed to handle a level triggered GPE. The handling code should be protected by the driver's specific lock. Thus the GPE enabling/disabling/clearing operations are likely to be performed with the driver's specific lock held while we currently cannot do this. This is because: 1. We have the acpi_gbl_gpe_lock held before invoking the GPE driver's handler. Driver's specific lock is likely to be held inside of the handler, thus we can see some dead lock issues due to the reversed locking order or recursive locking. In order to solve such dead lock issues, we need to unlock the acpi_gbl_gpe_lock before invoking the handler. BZ 1100. 2. Since GPE disabling/enabling/clearing should be determined by the GPE driver's state machine, we shouldn't perform such operations inside of ACPICA for a GPE handler to mess up the driver's state machine. BZ 1101. Originally this patch includes a logic to flush GPE handlers, it is dropped due to the following reasons: 1. This is a different issue; 2. Linux OSL has fixed this by flushing SCI in acpi_os_wait_events_complete(). We will pick up this topic when the Linux OSL fix turns out to be not sufficient. Note that currently the internal operations and the acpi_gbl_gpe_lock are also used by ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_METHOD and ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_NOTIFY. In order not to introduce regressions, we add one ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_RAW_HANDLER type to be distiguished from ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_HANDLER. For which the acpi_gbl_gpe_lock is unlocked before invoking the GPE handler and the internal enabling/disabling operations are bypassed to allow drivers to perform them at a proper position using the GPE APIs and ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_RAW_HANDLER users should invoke acpi_set_gpe() instead of acpi_enable_gpe()/acpi_disable_gpe() to bypass the internal GPE clearing code in acpi_enable_gpe(). Lv Zheng. Known issues: 1. Edge-triggered GPE lost for frequent enablings On some buggy silicon platforms, GPE enable line may not be directly wired to the GPE trigger line. In that case, when GPE enabling is frequently performed for edge-triggered GPEs, GPE status may stay set without being triggered. This patch may maginify this problem as it allows GPE enabling to be parallel performed during the process the GPEs are handled. This is an existing issue, because: 1. For task context: Current ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_METHOD practices have proven that this isn't a real issue - we can re-enable edge-triggered GPE in a work queue where the GPE status bit might already be set. 2. For IRQ context: This can even happen when the GPE enabling occurs before returning from the GPE handler and after unlocking the GPE lock. Thus currently no code is included to protect this. Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/199cad16 Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-02-05ACPICA: Update Copyright headers to 2015David E. Box
ACPICA commit 8990e73ab2aa15d6a0068b860ab54feff25bee36 Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/8990e73a Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-02-05ACPICA: Events: Cleanup GPE dispatcher type obtaining codeLv Zheng
ACPICA commit 7926d5ca9452c87f866938dcea8f12e1efb58f89 There is an issue in acpi_install_gpe_handler() and acpi_remove_gpe_handler(). The code to obtain the GPE dispatcher type from the Handler->original_flags is wrong: if (((Handler->original_flags & ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_METHOD) || (Handler->original_flags & ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_NOTIFY)) && ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_NOTIFY is 0x03 and ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_METHOD is 0x02, thus this statement is TRUE for the following dispatcher types: 0x01 (ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_HANDLER): not expected 0x02 (ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_METHOD): expected 0x03 (ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_NOTIFY): expected There is no functional issue due to this because Handler->original_flags is only set in acpi_install_gpe_handler(), and an earlier checker has excluded the ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_HANDLER: if ((gpe_event_info->Flags & ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_MASK) == ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_HANDLER) { Status = AE_ALREADY_EXISTS; goto free_and_exit; } ... Handler->original_flags = (u8) (gpe_event_info->Flags & (ACPI_GPE_XRUPT_TYPE_MASK | ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_MASK)); We need to clean this up before modifying the GPE dispatcher type values. In order to prevent such issue from happening in the future, this patch introduces ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_TYPE() macro to be used to obtain the GPE dispatcher types. Lv Zheng. Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/7926d5ca Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-02-05ACPICA: Events: Cleanup to move acpi_gbl_global_event_handler invocation out ↵Lv Zheng
of acpi_ev_gpe_dispatch() ACPICA commit 04f25acdd4f655ae33f83de789bb5f4b7790171c This patch follows acpi_ev_fixed_event_detect(), which invokes acpi_gbl_global_event_handler instead of invoking it in acpi_ev_fixed_event_dispatch(), moves acpi_gbl_global_event_handler from acpi_ev_gpe_dispatch() to acpi_ev_gpe_detect(). This makes further cleanups around acpi_ev_gpe_dispatch() simpler. Lv Zheng. Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/04f25acd Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-02-05ACPICA: Events: Fix uninitialized variableDavid E. Box
ACPICA commit 8e21180050270897499652e922c6a41b8eb388b6 Recent changes to acpi_ev_asynch_execute_gpe_method left Status variable uninitialized before use. Initialize to AE_OK. Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/8e211800 Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-02-05ACPICA: Events: Remove acpi_ev_valid_gpe_event() due to current restrictionLv Zheng
ACPICA commit 8823b44ff53859ab24ecfcfd3fba8cc56b17d223 Currently we rely on the logic that GPE blocks will never be deleted, otherwise we can be broken by the race between acpi_ev_create_gpe_block(), acpi_ev_delete_gpe_block() and acpi_ev_gpe_detect(). On the other hand, if we want to protect GPE block creation/deletion, we need to use a different synchronization facility to protect the period between acpi_ev_gpe_dispatch() and acpi_ev_asynch_enable_gpe(). Which leaves us no choice but abandoning the ACPI_MTX_EVENTS used during this period. This patch removes ACPI_MTX_EVENTS used during this period and the acpi_ev_valid_gpe_event() to reflect current restriction. Lv Zheng. Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/8823b44f Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-02-05ACPICA: Events: Remove duplicated sanity check in acpi_ev_enable_gpe()Lv Zheng
ACPICA commit ca10324788bc9bdaf47fa9e51145129c1299144d This patch deletes a sanity check from acpi_ev_enable_gpe(). This kind of check is already done in acpi_enable_gpe()/acpi_remove_gpe_handler()/acpi_update_all_gpes() before invoking acpi_ev_enable_gpe(): 1. acpi_enable_gpe(): same check (skip if DISPATCH_NONE) is now implemented. 2. acpi_remove_gpe_handler(): a more strict check (skip if !DISPATCH_HANDLER) is implemented. 3. acpi_update_all_gpes(): a more strict check (skip if DISPATCH_NONE || DISPATCH_HANDLER || CAN_WAKE) 4. acpi_set_gpe(): since it is invoked by the OSPM driver where the GPE handler is known to be available, such check isn't needed. So we can simply remove this duplicated check from acpi_ev_enable_gpe(). Lv Zheng. Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/ca103247 Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-12-03ACPICA: Events: Always modify GPE registers under the GPE lockLv Zheng
It is reported that there are pieces of code invoking acpi_ev_finish_gpe() without holding acpi_gbl_gpe_lock. Since this function will modify GPE register values, there could be races breaking the register modification process. This patch fixes this issue. Lv Zheng. Reported-by: Joe Liu <joe.liu@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-12-01ACPICA: Save current masks of enabled GPEs after enable register writesRafael J. Wysocki
There is a race condition between acpi_hw_disable_all_gpes() or acpi_enable_all_wakeup_gpes() and acpi_ev_asynch_enable_gpe() such that if the latter wins the race, it may mistakenly enable a GPE disabled by the former. This may lead to premature system wakeups during system suspend and potentially to more serious consequences. The source of the problem is how acpi_hw_low_set_gpe() works when passed ACPI_GPE_CONDITIONAL_ENABLE as the second argument. In that case, the GPE will be enabled if the corresponding bit is set in the enable_for_run mask of the GPE enable register containing that bit. However, acpi_hw_disable_all_gpes() and acpi_enable_all_wakeup_gpes() don't modify the enable_for_run masks of GPE registers when writing to them. In consequence, if acpi_ev_asynch_enable_gpe(), which eventually calls acpi_hw_low_set_gpe() with the second argument equal to ACPI_GPE_CONDITIONAL_ENABLE, is executed in parallel with one of these functions, it may reverse changes made by them. To fix the problem, introduce a new enable_mask field in struct acpi_gpe_register_info in which to store the current mask of enabled GPEs and modify acpi_hw_low_set_gpe() to take this mask into account instead of enable_for_run when its second argument is equal to ACPI_GPE_CONDITIONAL_ENABLE. Also modify the low-level routines called by acpi_hw_disable_all_gpes(), acpi_enable_all_wakeup_gpes() and acpi_enable_all_runtime_gpes() to update the enable_mask masks of GPE registers after all (successful) writes to those registers. Acked-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-10-21ACPICA: Events: Reduce indent divergences of events files.Lv Zheng
This patch reduces indent divergences first in order to reduce human intervention work for the follow-up linuxized event patches. Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-07-07ACPICA: Events: Fix edge-triggered GPE by disabling before acknowledging it.Lv Zheng
Due to ACPI specificiation 5, chapter 5.6.4 General-Purpose Event Handling, OSPMs need to disable GPE before clearing the status bit for edge-triggered GPEs. Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Tested-by: Gareth Williams <gareth@garethwilliams.me.uk> Tested-by: Steffen Weber <steffen.weber@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-05-07ACPICA: Events: Update GPE handling and initialization code.Bob Moore
1) Eliminate most use of GAS structs, since they are not needed for GPEs. 2) Allow raw GPE numbers > 255. Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-02-11ACPICA: Update ACPICA copyrights to 2014.Bob Moore
Update ACPICA copyrights to 2014. Includes all source headers and signons for the various tools. Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-31ACPICA: Linuxize: Change indentation of C labels.Lv Zheng
It is reported by kernel build test systems that all ACPICA source files in the kernel tree have incorrect label indentation. This patch changes default indent option used in the release process to fix this bug. Lv Zheng. Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-30ACPICA: Fix possible memory leaks in the GPE handling.Lv Zheng
This change fixes potential memory leaks in the error paths of the GPE handling code. Lv Zheng. Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-06-16ACPICA: Standardize all switch() blocksChao Guan
After many years, different formatting for switch() has crept in. This change makes every switch block identical. Chao Guan. ACPICA bugzilla 997. References: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=997 Signed-off-by: Chao Guan <chao.guan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-06-01ACPICA: Add argument typechecking for all predefined ACPI namesBob Moore
Fully implements typechecking on all incoming arguments for all predefined names. This ensures that ACPI-related drivers are passing the correct number of arguments, each of the correct object type. Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Acked-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-03-12ACPICA: Regression fix: reinstate safe exit macrosBob Moore
Removal caused a regression on at least FreeBSD. This fix reinstates the macros. Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-01-25ACPICA: Update ACPICA copyrights to 2013Bob Moore
Includes all source headers and signons for the various tools. Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-01-10ACPICA: Eliminate superfluous return_UINT8 and return_UINT32 macros.Bob Moore
These macros were implemented the same as return_VALUE and thus they were not needed. Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-01-10ACPICA: Enhance error messages.Lv Zheng
This patch decreases 29 lines of 20121018 divergence.diff. This patch updates error messages that already have been enhanced in ACPICA. This patch can also help to reduce the source code differences between Linux and ACPICA. Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-01-10ACPICA: Cleanup updated comments.Lv Zheng
This is a cosmetic patch only. Comparison of the resulting binary showed only line number differences. This patch does not affect the generation of the Linux binary. This patch decreases 558 lines of 20121018 divergence.diff. This patch reduces the source code diff between Linux and ACPICA by cleaning the comments that already have been updated in ACPICA. There is no extra indentation done in this patch. Even the empty line deletions and insertions are also splitted into another cleanup patch so that this patch can be easily reviewed, and the binary differences can be held to a lowest level. Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15ACPICA: Fix indent caused divergences.Lv Zheng
New version of "indent" program will generate different outputs that will lead to the divergences between the Linux and the ACPICA. This patch fixes such divergences caused by the "indent" program. The version of the "indent" used for this patch is "GNU indent 2.2.11". This patch will not affect the generated vmlinux binary. This will decrease 581 lines of 20120913 divergence.diff. Signed-off-by: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-09-21ACPICA: GPE support: Remove extraneous parameter from low-level function.Feng Tang
The gpe_register_info argument is no longer needed, reduce it to make code simpler. Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2012-09-21ACPICA: GPE Support: Update debug info for GPE tracing.Bob Moore
Add additional debug info to assist with GPE debugging. Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2012-07-14ACPICA: Add support for implicit notify on multiple devicesBob Moore
Adds basic support to allow multiple devices to be implicitly notified. This change is partially derived from original commit 981858b("ACPI / ACPICA: Implicit notify for multiple devices") by Rafael. Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2012-03-22ACPICA: Support for custom ACPICA build for ACPI 5 reduced hardwareBob Moore
Add ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE flag that removes all hardware-related code (about 10% code, 5% static data). Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2012-01-17ACPICA: Update all copyrights to 2012Bob Moore
Update all copyrights to 2012. Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-03-18Merge branch 'acpica' into releaseLen Brown
2011-03-02ACPICA: GPE detect optimization - ignore unused GPE registersLin Ming
This optimization will simply ignore GPE registers that contain no enabled GPEs - there is no need to read the register. ACPICA bugzilla 884. http://www.acpica.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=884 Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-02-24ACPI / ACPICA: Implicit notify for multiple devicesRafael J. Wysocki
Commit bba63a2 (ACPICA: Implicit notify support) introduced a mechanism that causes a notify request of type ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_WAKE to be queued automatically by acpi_ev_asynch_execute_gpe_method() for the device whose _PRW points to the GPE being handled if that GPE is not associated with an _Lxx/_Exx method. However, it turns out that on some systems there are multiple devices with _PRW pointing to the same GPE without _Lxx/_Exx and the mechanism introduced by commit bba63a2 needs to be extended so that "implicit" notify requests of type ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_WAKE can be queued automatically for all those devices at the same time. Reported-and-tested-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-01-18ACPICA: Update all ACPICA copyrights and signons to 2011Bob Moore
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-18ACPICA: Fix memory leak in acpi_ev_asynch_execute_gpe_method().Jesper Juhl
We will leak the memory allocated to 'local_gpe_event_info' if 'acpi_ut_acquire_mutex()' fails or if 'acpi_ev_valid_gpe_event()' fails in drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpe.c::acpi_ev_asynch_execute_gpe_method(). Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> Reviewed-by: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-12ACPICA: Misc comments to minimize code divergenceLin Ming
Modify/add some comments to minimize ACPICA/linux GPE code divergence. Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-12ACPICA: Global event handlerLin Ming
The global event handler is called whenever a general purpose or fixed ACPI event occurs. Also update Linux OSL to collect events counter with global event handler. Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>