aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2023-07-24x86/microcode/AMD: Load late on both threads tooBorislav Petkov (AMD)
commit a32b0f0db3f396f1c9be2fe621e77c09ec3d8e7d upstream. Do the same as early loading - load on both threads. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605141332.25948-1-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-03-11x86/microcode/AMD: Fix mixed steppings supportBorislav Petkov (AMD)
commit 7ff6edf4fef38ab404ee7861f257e28eaaeed35f upstream. The AMD side of the loader has always claimed to support mixed steppings. But somewhere along the way, it broke that by assuming that the cached patch blob is a single one instead of it being one per *node*. So turn it into a per-node one so that each node can stash the blob relevant for it. [ NB: Fixes tag is not really the exactly correct one but it is good enough. ] Fixes: fe055896c040 ("x86/microcode: Merge the early microcode loader") Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # 2355370cd941 ("x86/microcode/amd: Remove load_microcode_amd()'s bsp parameter") Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # a5ad92134bd1 ("x86/microcode/AMD: Add a @cpu parameter to the reloading functions") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230130161709.11615-4-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-03-11x86/microcode/AMD: Add a @cpu parameter to the reloading functionsBorislav Petkov (AMD)
commit a5ad92134bd153a9ccdcddf09a95b088f36c3cce upstream. Will be used in a subsequent change. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230130161709.11615-3-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-03-11x86/microcode/amd: Remove load_microcode_amd()'s bsp parameterBorislav Petkov (AMD)
commit 2355370cd941cbb20882cc3f34460f9f2b8f9a18 upstream. It is always the BSP. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230130161709.11615-2-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-01-18x86/microcode/intel: Do not retry microcode reloading on the APsAshok Raj
commit be1b670f61443aa5d0d01782e9b8ea0ee825d018 upstream. The retries in load_ucode_intel_ap() were in place to support systems with mixed steppings. Mixed steppings are no longer supported and there is only one microcode image at a time. Any retries will simply reattempt to apply the same image over and over without making progress. [ bp: Zap the circumstantial reasoning from the commit message. ] Fixes: 06b8534cb728 ("x86/microcode: Rework microcode loading") Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221129210832.107850-3-ashok.raj@intel.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-11-03x86/microcode/AMD: Apply the patch early on every logical threadBorislav Petkov
commit e7ad18d1169c62e6c78c01ff693fd362d9d65278 upstream. Currently, the patch application logic checks whether the revision needs to be applied on each logical CPU (SMT thread). Therefore, on SMT designs where the microcode engine is shared between the two threads, the application happens only on one of them as that is enough to update the shared microcode engine. However, there are microcode patches which do per-thread modification, see Link tag below. Therefore, drop the revision check and try applying on each thread. This is what the BIOS does too so this method is very much tested. Btw, change only the early paths. On the late loading paths, there's no point in doing per-thread modification because if is it some case like in the bugzilla below - removing a CPUID flag - the kernel cannot go and un-use features it has detected are there early. For that, one should use early loading anyway. [ bp: Fixes does not contain the oldest commit which did check for equality but that is good enough. ] Fixes: 8801b3fcb574 ("x86/microcode/AMD: Rework container parsing") Reported-by: Ștefan Talpalaru <stefantalpalaru@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Tested-by: Ștefan Talpalaru <stefantalpalaru@yahoo.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216211 Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-05-12x86/cpu: Load microcode during restore_processor_state()Borislav Petkov
commit f9e14dbbd454581061c736bf70bf5cbb15ac927c upstream. When resuming from system sleep state, restore_processor_state() restores the boot CPU MSRs. These MSRs could be emulated by microcode. If microcode is not loaded yet, writing to emulated MSRs leads to unchecked MSR access error: ... PM: Calling lapic_suspend+0x0/0x210 unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x10f (tried to write 0x0...0) at rIP: ... (native_write_msr) Call Trace: <TASK> ? restore_processor_state x86_acpi_suspend_lowlevel acpi_suspend_enter suspend_devices_and_enter pm_suspend.cold state_store kobj_attr_store sysfs_kf_write kernfs_fop_write_iter new_sync_write vfs_write ksys_write __x64_sys_write do_syscall_64 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe RIP: 0033:0x7fda13c260a7 To ensure microcode emulated MSRs are available for restoration, load the microcode on the boot CPU before restoring these MSRs. [ Pawan: write commit message and productize it. ] Fixes: e2a1256b17b1 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume") Reported-by: Kyle D. Pelton <kyle.d.pelton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Kyle D. Pelton <kyle.d.pelton@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215841 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4350dfbf785cd482d3fafa72b2b49c83102df3ce.1650386317.git.pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-22x86/microcode: Check for offline CPUs before requesting new microcodeOtavio Pontes
[ Upstream commit 7189b3c11903667808029ec9766a6e96de5012a5 ] Currently, the late microcode loading mechanism checks whether any CPUs are offlined, and, in such a case, aborts the load attempt. However, this must be done before the kernel caches new microcode from the filesystem. Otherwise, when offlined CPUs are onlined later, those cores are going to be updated through the CPU hotplug notifier callback with the new microcode, while CPUs previously onine will continue to run with the older microcode. For example: Turn off one core (2 threads): echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/online echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online Install the ucode fails because a primary SMT thread is offline: cp intel-ucode/06-8e-09 /lib/firmware/intel-ucode/ echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/microcode/reload bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument Turn the core back on echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/online echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online cat /proc/cpuinfo |grep microcode microcode : 0x30 microcode : 0xde microcode : 0x30 microcode : 0xde The rationale for why the update is aborted when at least one primary thread is offline is because even if that thread is soft-offlined and idle, it will still have to participate in broadcasted MCE's synchronization dance or enter SMM, and in both examples it will execute instructions so it better have the same microcode revision as the other cores. [ bp: Heavily edit and extend commit message with the reasoning behind all this. ] Fixes: 30ec26da9967 ("x86/microcode: Do not upload microcode if CPUs are offline") Signed-off-by: Otavio Pontes <otavio.pontes@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Acked-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210319165515.9240-2-otavio.pontes@intel.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-11-24x86/microcode/intel: Check patch signature before saving microcode for early ↵Chen Yu
loading commit 1a371e67dc77125736cc56d3a0893f06b75855b6 upstream. Currently, scan_microcode() leverages microcode_matches() to check if the microcode matches the CPU by comparing the family and model. However, the processor stepping and flags of the microcode signature should also be considered when saving a microcode patch for early update. Use find_matching_signature() in scan_microcode() and get rid of the now-unused microcode_matches() which is a good cleanup in itself. Complete the verification of the patch being saved for early loading in save_microcode_patch() directly. This needs to be done there too because save_mc_for_early() will call save_microcode_patch() too. The second reason why this needs to be done is because the loader still tries to support, at least hypothetically, mixed-steppings systems and thus adds all patches to the cache that belong to the same CPU model albeit with different steppings. For example: microcode: CPU: sig=0x906ec, pf=0x2, rev=0xd6 microcode: mc_saved[0]: sig=0x906e9, pf=0x2a, rev=0xd6, total size=0x19400, date = 2020-04-23 microcode: mc_saved[1]: sig=0x906ea, pf=0x22, rev=0xd6, total size=0x19000, date = 2020-04-27 microcode: mc_saved[2]: sig=0x906eb, pf=0x2, rev=0xd6, total size=0x19400, date = 2020-04-23 microcode: mc_saved[3]: sig=0x906ec, pf=0x22, rev=0xd6, total size=0x19000, date = 2020-04-27 microcode: mc_saved[4]: sig=0x906ed, pf=0x22, rev=0xd6, total size=0x19400, date = 2020-04-23 The patch which is being saved for early loading, however, can only be the one which fits the CPU this runs on so do the signature verification before saving. [ bp: Do signature verification in save_microcode_patch() and rewrite commit message. ] Fixes: ec400ddeff20 ("x86/microcode_intel_early.c: Early update ucode on Intel's CPU") Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208535 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201113015923.13960-1-yu.c.chen@intel.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-07-03x86/microcode: Fix the microcode load on CPU hotplug for realThomas Gleixner
commit 5423f5ce5ca410b3646f355279e4e937d452e622 upstream. A recent change moved the microcode loader hotplug callback into the early startup phase which is running with interrupts disabled. It missed that the callbacks invoke sysfs functions which might sleep causing nice 'might sleep' splats with proper debugging enabled. Split the callbacks and only load the microcode in the early startup phase and move the sysfs handling back into the later threaded and preemptible bringup phase where it was before. Fixes: 78f4e932f776 ("x86/microcode, cpuhotplug: Add a microcode loader CPU hotplug callback") Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1906182228350.1766@nanos.tec.linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-06-19x86/microcode, cpuhotplug: Add a microcode loader CPU hotplug callbackBorislav Petkov
commit 78f4e932f7760d965fb1569025d1576ab77557c5 upstream. Adric Blake reported the following warning during suspend-resume: Enabling non-boot CPUs ... x86: Booting SMP configuration: smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x2 unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x10f (tried to write 0x0000000000000000) \ at rIP: 0xffffffff8d267924 (native_write_msr+0x4/0x20) Call Trace: intel_set_tfa intel_pmu_cpu_starting ? x86_pmu_dead_cpu x86_pmu_starting_cpu cpuhp_invoke_callback ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave notify_cpu_starting start_secondary secondary_startup_64 microcode: sig=0x806ea, pf=0x80, revision=0x96 microcode: updated to revision 0xb4, date = 2019-04-01 CPU1 is up The MSR in question is MSR_TFA_RTM_FORCE_ABORT and that MSR is emulated by microcode. The log above shows that the microcode loader callback happens after the PMU restoration, leading to the conjecture that because the microcode hasn't been updated yet, that MSR is not present yet, leading to the #GP. Add a microcode loader-specific hotplug vector which comes before the PERF vectors and thus executes earlier and makes sure the MSR is present. Fixes: 400816f60c54 ("perf/x86/intel: Implement support for TSX Force Abort") Reported-by: Adric Blake <promarbler14@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: x86@kernel.org Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203637 Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-31x86/microcode: Fix the ancient deprecated microcode loading methodBorislav Petkov
[ Upstream commit 24613a04ad1c0588c10f4b5403ca60a73d164051 ] Commit 2613f36ed965 ("x86/microcode: Attempt late loading only when new microcode is present") added the new define UCODE_NEW to denote that an update should happen only when newer microcode (than installed on the system) has been found. But it missed adjusting that for the old /dev/cpu/microcode loading interface. Fix it. Fixes: 2613f36ed965 ("x86/microcode: Attempt late loading only when new microcode is present") Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190405133010.24249-3-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2019-03-13x86/microcode/amd: Don't falsely trick the late loading mechanismThomas Lendacky
[ Upstream commit 912139cfbfa6a2bc1da052314d2c29338dae1f6a ] The load_microcode_amd() function searches for microcode patches and attempts to apply a microcode patch if it is of different level than the currently installed level. While the processor won't actually load a level that is less than what is already installed, the logic wrongly returns UCODE_NEW thus signaling to its caller reload_store() that a late loading should be attempted. If the file-system contains an older microcode revision than what is currently running, such a late microcode reload can result in these misleading messages: x86/CPU: CPU features have changed after loading microcode, but might not take effect. x86/CPU: Please consider either early loading through initrd/built-in or a potential BIOS update. These messages were issued on a system where SME/SEV are not enabled by the BIOS (MSR C001_0010[23] = 0b) because during boot, early_detect_mem_encrypt() is called and cleared the SME and SEV features in this case. However, after the wrong late load attempt, get_cpu_cap() is called and reloads the SME and SEV feature bits, resulting in the messages. Update the microcode level check to not attempt microcode loading if the current level is greater than(!) and not only equal to the current patch level. [ bp: massage commit message. ] Fixes: 2613f36ed965 ("x86/microcode: Attempt late loading only when new microcode is present") Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/154894518427.9406.8246222496874202773.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2018-09-02x86/microcode: Update the new microcode revision unconditionallyFilippo Sironi
Handle the case where microcode gets loaded on the BSP's hyperthread sibling first and the boot_cpu_data's microcode revision doesn't get updated because of early exit due to the siblings sharing a microcode engine. For that, simply write the updated revision on all CPUs unconditionally. Signed-off-by: Filippo Sironi <sironi@amazon.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: prarit@redhat.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1533050970-14385-1-git-send-email-sironi@amazon.de
2018-09-02x86/microcode: Make sure boot_cpu_data.microcode is up-to-datePrarit Bhargava
When preparing an MCE record for logging, boot_cpu_data.microcode is used to read out the microcode revision on the box. However, on systems where late microcode update has happened, the microcode revision output in a MCE log record is wrong because boot_cpu_data.microcode is not updated when the microcode gets updated. But, the microcode revision saved in boot_cpu_data's microcode member should be kept up-to-date, regardless, for consistency. Make it so. Fixes: fa94d0c6e0f3 ("x86/MCE: Save microcode revision in machine check records") Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: sironi@amazon.de Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180731112739.32338-1-prarit@redhat.com
2018-08-10x86/microcode: Allow late microcode loading with SMT disabledJosh Poimboeuf
The kernel unnecessarily prevents late microcode loading when SMT is disabled. It should be safe to allow it if all the primary threads are online. Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
2018-06-22x86/microcode/intel: Fix memleak in save_microcode_patch()Zhenzhong Duan
Free useless ucode_patch entry when it's replaced. [ bp: Drop the memfree_patch() two-liner. ] Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Srinivas REDDY Eeda <srinivas.eeda@oracle.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/888102f0-fd22-459d-b090-a1bd8a00cb2b@default
2018-05-27x86/microcode: Make the late update update_lock a raw lock for RTScott Wood
__reload_late() is called from stop_machine context and thus cannot acquire a non-raw spinlock on PREEMPT_RT. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <swood@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Pei Zhang <pezhang@redhat.com> Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180524154420.24455-1-swood@redhat.com
2018-04-24x86/microcode: Do not exit early from __reload_late()Borislav Petkov
Vitezslav reported a case where the "Timeout during microcode update!" panic would hit. After a deeper look, it turned out that his .config had CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU disabled which practically made save_mc_for_early() a no-op. When that happened, the discovered microcode patch wasn't saved into the cache and the late loading path wouldn't find any. This, then, lead to early exit from __reload_late() and thus CPUs waiting until the timeout is reached, leading to the panic. In hindsight, that function should have been written so it does not return before the post-synchronization. Oh well, I know better now... Fixes: bb8c13d61a62 ("x86/microcode: Fix CPU synchronization routine") Reported-by: Vitezslav Samel <vitezslav@samel.cz> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Vitezslav Samel <vitezslav@samel.cz> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180418081140.GA2439@pc11.op.pod.cz Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180421081930.15741-2-bp@alien8.de
2018-04-24x86/microcode/intel: Save microcode patch unconditionallyBorislav Petkov
save_mc_for_early() was a no-op on !CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU but the generic_load_microcode() path saves the microcode patches it has found into the cache of patches which is used for late loading too. Regardless of whether CPU hotplug is used or not. Make the saving unconditional so that late loading can find the proper patch. Reported-by: Vitezslav Samel <vitezslav@samel.cz> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Vitezslav Samel <vitezslav@samel.cz> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180418081140.GA2439@pc11.op.pod.cz Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180421081930.15741-1-bp@alien8.de
2018-03-27Documentation: Fix early-microcode.txt references after file renameJaak Ristioja
The file Documentation/x86/early-microcode.txt was renamed to Documentation/x86/microcode.txt in 0e3258753f81, but it was still referenced by its old name in a three places: * Documentation/x86/00-INDEX * arch/x86/Kconfig * arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c This commit updates these references accordingly. Fixes: 0e3258753f81 ("x86/microcode: Document the three loading methods") Signed-off-by: Jaak Ristioja <jaak@ristioja.ee> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2018-03-16x86/microcode: Fix CPU synchronization routineBorislav Petkov
Emanuel reported an issue with a hang during microcode update because my dumb idea to use one atomic synchronization variable for both rendezvous - before and after update - was simply bollocks: microcode: microcode_reload_late: late_cpus: 4 microcode: __reload_late: cpu 2 entered microcode: __reload_late: cpu 1 entered microcode: __reload_late: cpu 3 entered microcode: __reload_late: cpu 0 entered microcode: __reload_late: cpu 1 left microcode: Timeout while waiting for CPUs rendezvous, remaining: 1 CPU1 above would finish, leave and the others will still spin waiting for it to join. So do two synchronization atomics instead, which makes the code a lot more straightforward. Also, since the update is serialized and it also takes quite some time per microcode engine, increase the exit timeout by the number of CPUs on the system. That's ok because the moment all CPUs are done, that timeout will be cut short. Furthermore, panic when some of the CPUs timeout when returning from a microcode update: we can't allow a system with not all cores updated. Also, as an optimization, do not do the exit sync if microcode wasn't updated. Reported-by: Emanuel Czirai <xftroxgpx@protonmail.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Emanuel Czirai <xftroxgpx@protonmail.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180314183615.17629-2-bp@alien8.de
2018-03-16x86/microcode: Attempt late loading only when new microcode is presentBorislav Petkov
Return UCODE_NEW from the scanning functions to denote that new microcode was found and only then attempt the expensive synchronization dance. Reported-by: Emanuel Czirai <xftroxgpx@protonmail.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Emanuel Czirai <xftroxgpx@protonmail.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180314183615.17629-1-bp@alien8.de
2018-03-08x86/microcode: Synchronize late microcode loadingAshok Raj
Original idea by Ashok, completely rewritten by Borislav. Before you read any further: the early loading method is still the preferred one and you should always do that. The following patch is improving the late loading mechanism for long running jobs and cloud use cases. Gather all cores and serialize the microcode update on them by doing it one-by-one to make the late update process as reliable as possible and avoid potential issues caused by the microcode update. [ Borislav: Rewrite completely. ] Co-developed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-8-bp@alien8.de
2018-03-08x86/microcode: Request microcode on the BSPBorislav Petkov
... so that any newer version can land in the cache and can later be fished out by the application functions. Do that before grabbing the hotplug lock. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-7-bp@alien8.de
2018-03-08x86/microcode/intel: Look into the patch cache firstBorislav Petkov
The cache might contain a newer patch - look in there first. A follow-on change will make sure newest patches are loaded into the cache of microcode patches. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-6-bp@alien8.de
2018-03-08x86/microcode: Do not upload microcode if CPUs are offlineAshok Raj
Avoid loading microcode if any of the CPUs are offline, and issue a warning. Having different microcode revisions on the system at any time is outright dangerous. [ Borislav: Massage changelog. ] Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519352533-15992-4-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-5-bp@alien8.de
2018-03-08x86/microcode/intel: Writeback and invalidate caches before updating microcodeAshok Raj
Updating microcode is less error prone when caches have been flushed and depending on what exactly the microcode is updating. For example, some of the issues around certain Broadwell parts can be addressed by doing a full cache flush. [ Borislav: Massage it and use native_wbinvd() in both cases. ] Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519352533-15992-3-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-4-bp@alien8.de
2018-03-08x86/microcode/intel: Check microcode revision before updating sibling threadsAshok Raj
After updating microcode on one of the threads of a core, the other thread sibling automatically gets the update since the microcode resources on a hyperthreaded core are shared between the two threads. Check the microcode revision on the CPU before performing a microcode update and thus save us the WRMSR 0x79 because it is a particularly expensive operation. [ Borislav: Massage changelog and coding style. ] Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519352533-15992-2-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-3-bp@alien8.de
2018-03-08x86/microcode: Get rid of struct apply_microcode_ctxBorislav Petkov
It is a useless remnant from earlier times. Use the ucode_state enum directly. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-2-bp@alien8.de
2018-02-17x86/CPU: Add a microcode loader callbackBorislav Petkov
Add a callback function which the microcode loader calls when microcode has been updated to a newer revision. Do the callback only when no error was encountered during loading. Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180216112640.11554-3-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-02-17x86/microcode: Propagate return value from updating functionsBorislav Petkov
... so that callers can know when microcode was updated and act accordingly. Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180216112640.11554-2-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-02-14Merge branch 'x86-pti-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull x86 PTI and Spectre related fixes and updates from Ingo Molnar: "Here's the latest set of Spectre and PTI related fixes and updates: Spectre: - Add entry code register clearing to reduce the Spectre attack surface - Update the Spectre microcode blacklist - Inline the KVM Spectre helpers to get close to v4.14 performance again. - Fix indirect_branch_prediction_barrier() - Fix/improve Spectre related kernel messages - Fix array_index_nospec_mask() asm constraint - KVM: fix two MSR handling bugs PTI: - Fix a paranoid entry PTI CR3 handling bug - Fix comments objtool: - Fix paranoid_entry() frame pointer warning - Annotate WARN()-related UD2 as reachable - Various fixes - Add Add Peter Zijlstra as objtool co-maintainer Misc: - Various x86 entry code self-test fixes - Improve/simplify entry code stack frame generation and handling after recent heavy-handed PTI and Spectre changes. (There's two more WIP improvements expected here.) - Type fix for cache entries There's also some low risk non-fix changes I've included in this branch to reduce backporting conflicts: - rename a confusing x86_cpu field name - de-obfuscate the naming of single-TLB flushing primitives" * 'x86-pti-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (41 commits) x86/entry/64: Fix CR3 restore in paranoid_exit() x86/cpu: Change type of x86_cache_size variable to unsigned int x86/spectre: Fix an error message x86/cpu: Rename cpu_data.x86_mask to cpu_data.x86_stepping selftests/x86/mpx: Fix incorrect bounds with old _sigfault x86/mm: Rename flush_tlb_single() and flush_tlb_one() to __flush_tlb_one_[user|kernel]() x86/speculation: Add <asm/msr-index.h> dependency nospec: Move array_index_nospec() parameter checking into separate macro x86/speculation: Fix up array_index_nospec_mask() asm constraint x86/debug: Use UD2 for WARN() x86/debug, objtool: Annotate WARN()-related UD2 as reachable objtool: Fix segfault in ignore_unreachable_insn() selftests/x86: Disable tests requiring 32-bit support on pure 64-bit systems selftests/x86: Do not rely on "int $0x80" in single_step_syscall.c selftests/x86: Do not rely on "int $0x80" in test_mremap_vdso.c selftests/x86: Fix build bug caused by the 5lvl test which has been moved to the VM directory selftests/x86/pkeys: Remove unused functions selftests/x86: Clean up and document sscanf() usage selftests/x86: Fix vDSO selftest segfault for vsyscall=none x86/entry/64: Remove the unused 'icebp' macro ...
2018-02-15x86/cpu: Change type of x86_cache_size variable to unsigned intGustavo A. R. Silva
Currently, x86_cache_size is of type int, which makes no sense as we will never have a valid cache size equal or less than 0. So instead of initializing this variable to -1, it can perfectly be initialized to 0 and use it as an unsigned variable instead. Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1464429 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180213192208.GA26414@embeddedor.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-02-15x86/cpu: Rename cpu_data.x86_mask to cpu_data.x86_steppingJia Zhang
x86_mask is a confusing name which is hard to associate with the processor's stepping. Additionally, correct an indent issue in lib/cpu.c. Signed-off-by: Jia Zhang <qianyue.zj@alibaba-inc.com> [ Updated it to more recent kernels. ] Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bp@alien8.de Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1514771530-70829-1-git-send-email-qianyue.zj@alibaba-inc.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-02-01Merge tag 'driver-core-4.16-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core Pull driver core updates from Greg KH: "Here is the set of "big" driver core patches for 4.16-rc1. The majority of the work here is in the firmware subsystem, with reworks to try to attempt to make the code easier to handle in the long run, but no functional change. There's also some tree-wide sysfs attribute fixups with lots of acks from the various subsystem maintainers, as well as a handful of other normal fixes and changes. And finally, some license cleanups for the driver core and sysfs code. All have been in linux-next for a while with no reported issues" * tag 'driver-core-4.16-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core: (48 commits) device property: Define type of PROPERTY_ENRTY_*() macros device property: Reuse property_entry_free_data() device property: Move property_entry_free_data() upper firmware: Fix up docs referring to FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL firmware: Drop FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL Kconfig option USB: serial: keyspan: Drop firmware Kconfig options sysfs: remove DEBUG defines sysfs: use SPDX identifiers drivers: base: add coredump driver ops sysfs: add attribute specification for /sysfs/devices/.../coredump test_firmware: fix missing unlock on error in config_num_requests_store() test_firmware: make local symbol test_fw_config static sysfs: turn WARN() into pr_warn() firmware: Fix a typo in fallback-mechanisms.rst treewide: Use DEVICE_ATTR_WO treewide: Use DEVICE_ATTR_RO treewide: Use DEVICE_ATTR_RW sysfs.h: Use octal permissions component: add debugfs support bus: simple-pm-bus: convert bool SIMPLE_PM_BUS to tristate ...
2018-01-24x86/microcode: Fix again accessing initrd after having been freedBorislav Petkov
Commit 24c2503255d3 ("x86/microcode: Do not access the initrd after it has been freed") fixed attempts to access initrd from the microcode loader after it has been freed. However, a similar KASAN warning was reported (stack trace edited): smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x11 ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in find_cpio_data+0x9b5/0xa50 Read of size 1 at addr ffff880035ffd000 by task swapper/1/0 CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 4.14.8-slack #7 Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/A88X-PLUS, BIOS 3003 03/10/2016 Call Trace: dump_stack print_address_description kasan_report ? find_cpio_data __asan_report_load1_noabort find_cpio_data find_microcode_in_initrd __load_ucode_amd load_ucode_amd_ap load_ucode_ap After some investigation, it turned out that a merge was done using the wrong side to resolve, leading to picking up the previous state, before the 24c2503255d3 fix. Therefore the Fixes tag below contains a merge commit. Revert the mismerge by catching the save_microcode_in_initrd_amd() retval and thus letting the function exit with the last return statement so that initrd_gone can be set to true. Fixes: f26483eaedec ("Merge branch 'x86/urgent' into x86/microcode, to resolve conflicts") Reported-by: <higuita@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198295 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180123104133.918-2-bp@alien8.de
2018-01-24x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW late-loading further with LLC size checkJia Zhang
Commit b94b73733171 ("x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW late-loading with a revision check") reduced the impact of erratum BDF90 for Broadwell model 79. The impact can be reduced further by checking the size of the last level cache portion per core. Tony: "The erratum says the problem only occurs on the large-cache SKUs. So we only need to avoid the update if we are on a big cache SKU that is also running old microcode." For more details, see erratum BDF90 in document #334165 (Intel Xeon Processor E7-8800/4800 v4 Product Family Specification Update) from September 2017. Fixes: b94b73733171 ("x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW late-loading with a revision check") Signed-off-by: Jia Zhang <zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1516321542-31161-1-git-send-email-zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com
2018-01-09treewide: Use DEVICE_ATTR_WOJoe Perches
Convert DEVICE_ATTR uses to DEVICE_ATTR_WO where possible. Done with perl script: $ git grep -w --name-only DEVICE_ATTR | \ xargs perl -i -e 'local $/; while (<>) { s/\bDEVICE_ATTR\s*\(\s*(\w+)\s*,\s*\(?(?:\s*S_IWUSR\s*|\s*0200\s*)\)?\s*,\s*NULL\s*,\s*\s_store\s*\)/DEVICE_ATTR_WO(\1)/g; print;}' Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-01-06x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW late-loading with a revision checkJia Zhang
Instead of blacklisting all model 79 CPUs when attempting a late microcode loading, limit that only to CPUs with microcode revisions < 0x0b000021 because only on those late loading may cause a system hang. For such processors either: a) a BIOS update which might contain a newer microcode revision or b) the early microcode loading method should be considered. Processors with revisions 0x0b000021 or higher will not experience such hangs. For more details, see erratum BDF90 in document #334165 (Intel Xeon Processor E7-8800/4800 v4 Product Family Specification Update) from September 2017. [ bp: Heavily massage commit message and pr_* statements. ] Fixes: 723f2828a98c ("x86/microcode/intel: Disable late loading on model 79") Signed-off-by: Jia Zhang <qianyue.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.14 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1514772287-92959-1-git-send-email-qianyue.zj@alibaba-inc.com
2017-12-23Merge branch 'x86-pti-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull x86 PTI preparatory patches from Thomas Gleixner: "Todays Advent calendar window contains twentyfour easy to digest patches. The original plan was to have twenty three matching the date, but a late fixup made that moot. - Move the cpu_entry_area mapping out of the fixmap into a separate address space. That's necessary because the fixmap becomes too big with NRCPUS=8192 and this caused already subtle and hard to diagnose failures. The top most patch is fresh from today and cures a brain slip of that tall grumpy german greybeard, who ignored the intricacies of 32bit wraparounds. - Limit the number of CPUs on 32bit to 64. That's insane big already, but at least it's small enough to prevent address space issues with the cpu_entry_area map, which have been observed and debugged with the fixmap code - A few TLB flush fixes in various places plus documentation which of the TLB functions should be used for what. - Rename the SYSENTER stack to CPU_ENTRY_AREA stack as it is used for more than sysenter now and keeping the name makes backtraces confusing. - Prevent LDT inheritance on exec() by moving it to arch_dup_mmap(), which is only invoked on fork(). - Make vysycall more robust. - A few fixes and cleanups of the debug_pagetables code. Check PAGE_PRESENT instead of checking the PTE for 0 and a cleanup of the C89 initialization of the address hint array which already was out of sync with the index enums. - Move the ESPFIX init to a different place to prepare for PTI. - Several code moves with no functional change to make PTI integration simpler and header files less convoluted. - Documentation fixes and clarifications" * 'x86-pti-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (24 commits) x86/cpu_entry_area: Prevent wraparound in setup_cpu_entry_area_ptes() on 32bit init: Invoke init_espfix_bsp() from mm_init() x86/cpu_entry_area: Move it out of the fixmap x86/cpu_entry_area: Move it to a separate unit x86/mm: Create asm/invpcid.h x86/mm: Put MMU to hardware ASID translation in one place x86/mm: Remove hard-coded ASID limit checks x86/mm: Move the CR3 construction functions to tlbflush.h x86/mm: Add comments to clarify which TLB-flush functions are supposed to flush what x86/mm: Remove superfluous barriers x86/mm: Use __flush_tlb_one() for kernel memory x86/microcode: Dont abuse the TLB-flush interface x86/uv: Use the right TLB-flush API x86/entry: Rename SYSENTER_stack to CPU_ENTRY_AREA_entry_stack x86/doc: Remove obvious weirdnesses from the x86 MM layout documentation x86/mm/64: Improve the memory map documentation x86/ldt: Prevent LDT inheritance on exec x86/ldt: Rework locking arch, mm: Allow arch_dup_mmap() to fail x86/vsyscall/64: Warn and fail vsyscall emulation in NATIVE mode ...
2017-12-22x86/microcode: Dont abuse the TLB-flush interfacePeter Zijlstra
Commit: ec400ddeff20 ("x86/microcode_intel_early.c: Early update ucode on Intel's CPU") ... grubbed into tlbflush internals without coherent explanation. Since it says its a precaution and the SDM doesn't mention anything like this, take it out back. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@amazon.com> Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: aliguori@amazon.com Cc: daniel.gruss@iaik.tugraz.at Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: hughd@google.com Cc: keescook@google.com Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-12-06x86/microcode/AMD: Add support for fam17h microcode loadingTom Lendacky
The size for the Microcode Patch Block (MPB) for an AMD family 17h processor is 3200 bytes. Add a #define for fam17h so that it does not default to 2048 bytes and fail a microcode load/update. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171130224640.15391.40247.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-10-18x86/microcode/intel: Disable late loading on model 79Borislav Petkov
Blacklist Broadwell X model 79 for late loading due to an erratum. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171018111225.25635-1-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-10-14x86/microcode: Do the family check firstBorislav Petkov
On CPUs like AMD's Geode, for example, we shouldn't even try to load microcode because they do not support the modern microcode loading interface. However, we do the family check *after* the other checks whether the loader has been disabled on the command line or whether we're running in a guest. So move the family checks first in order to exit early if we're being loaded on an unsupported family. Reported-and-tested-by: Sven Glodowski <glodi1@arcor.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.11.. Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061396 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171012112316.977-1-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-09-04Merge branch 'x86-microcode-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull x86 microcode loading updates from Ingo Molnar: "Update documentation, improve robustness and fix a memory leak" * 'x86-microcode-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/microcode/intel: Improve microcode patches saving flow x86/microcode: Document the three loading methods x86/microcode/AMD: Free unneeded patch before exit from update_cache()
2017-08-29x86/microcode/intel: Improve microcode patches saving flowBorislav Petkov
Avoid potentially dereferencing a NULL pointer when saving a microcode patch for early loading on the application processors. While at it, drop the IS_ERR() checking in favor of simpler, NULL-ptr checks which are sufficient and rename __alloc_microcode_buf() to memdup_patch() to more precisely denote what it does. No functionality change. Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170825100456.n236w3jebteokfd6@pd.tnic
2017-08-18x86: Constify attribute_group structuresArvind Yadav
attribute_groups are not supposed to change at runtime and none of the groups is modified. Mark the non-const structs as const. [ tglx: Folded into one big patch ] Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: bp@alien8.de Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1500550238-15655-2-git-send-email-arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com
2017-07-25x86/microcode/AMD: Free unneeded patch before exit from update_cache()Shu Wang
verify_and_add_patch() allocates memory for a microcode patch and hands it down to be added to the cache of patches. However, if the cache already has the latest patch, the newly allocated one needs to be freed before returning. Do that. This issue has been found by kmemleak: unreferenced object 0xffff88010e780b40 (size 32): comm "bash", pid 860, jiffies 4294690939 (age 29.297s) backtrace: kmemleak_alloc kmem_cache_alloc_trace load_microcode_amd.isra.0 request_microcode_amd reload_store dev_attr_store sysfs_kf_write kernfs_fop_write __vfs_write vfs_write SyS_write do_syscall_64 return_from_SYSCALL_64 0xffffffffffffffff (gdb) list *0xffffffff81050d60 0xffffffff81050d60 is in load_microcode_amd (arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c:616). which is this: patch = kzalloc(sizeof(*patch), GFP_KERNEL); --> if (!patch) { pr_err("Patch allocation failure.\n"); return -EINVAL; } Signed-off-by: Shu Wang <shuwang@redhat.com> [ Rewrite commit message. ] Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: chuhu@redhat.com Cc: liwang@redhat.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170724101228.17326-2-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-06-26x86/microcode: Make a couple of symbols staticColin Ian King
The helper function __load_ucode_amd() and pointer intel_ucode_patch do not need to be in global scope, so make them static. Fixes those sparse warnings: "symbol '__load_ucode_amd' was not declared. Should it be static?" "symbol 'intel_ucode_patch' was not declared. Should it be static?" Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170622095736.11937-1-colin.king@canonical.com
generated by cgit 1.2.3-korg (git 2.39.0) at 2024-06-30 11:55:34 +0000