diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf_dump_test_case_syntax.c | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pyperf180.c | 22 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c | 27 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c | 31 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 13 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c | 6 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/search_pruning.c | 36 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sock.c | 81 |
8 files changed, 196 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf_dump_test_case_syntax.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf_dump_test_case_syntax.c index d4a02fe44a12..0620580a5c16 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf_dump_test_case_syntax.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf_dump_test_case_syntax.c @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ typedef void (* (*signal_t)(int, void (*)(int)))(int); typedef char * (*fn_ptr_arr1_t[10])(int **); -typedef char * (* const (* const fn_ptr_arr2_t[5])())(char * (*)(int)); +typedef char * (* (* const fn_ptr_arr2_t[5])())(char * (*)(int)); struct struct_w_typedefs { int_t a; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pyperf180.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pyperf180.c index c39f559d3100..42c4a8b62e36 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pyperf180.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pyperf180.c @@ -1,4 +1,26 @@ // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 // Copyright (c) 2019 Facebook #define STACK_MAX_LEN 180 + +/* llvm upstream commit at clang18 + * https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1a2e77cf9e11dbf56b5720c607313a566eebb16e + * changed inlining behavior and caused compilation failure as some branch + * target distance exceeded 16bit representation which is the maximum for + * cpu v1/v2/v3. Macro __BPF_CPU_VERSION__ is later implemented in clang18 + * to specify which cpu version is used for compilation. So a smaller + * unroll_count can be set if __BPF_CPU_VERSION__ is less than 4, which + * reduced some branch target distances and resolved the compilation failure. + * + * To capture the case where a developer/ci uses clang18 but the corresponding + * repo checkpoint does not have __BPF_CPU_VERSION__, a smaller unroll_count + * will be set as well to prevent potential compilation failures. + */ +#ifdef __BPF_CPU_VERSION__ +#if __BPF_CPU_VERSION__ < 4 +#define UNROLL_COUNT 90 +#endif +#elif __clang_major__ == 18 +#define UNROLL_COUNT 90 +#endif + #include "pyperf.h" diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c index 0262f7b374f9..6cc29b58d670 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c @@ -359,15 +359,15 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { * is still (4n), fixed offset is not changed. * Also, we create a new reg->id. */ - {29, "R5_w=pkt(id=4,off=18,r=0,umax_value=2040,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fc))"}, + {29, "R5_w=pkt(id=4,off=18,r=0,umax_value=2040,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fc)"}, /* At the time the word size load is performed from R5, * its total fixed offset is NET_IP_ALIGN + reg->off (18) * which is 20. Then the variable offset is (4n), so * the total offset is 4-byte aligned and meets the * load's requirements. */ - {33, "R4=pkt(id=4,off=22,r=22,umax_value=2040,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fc))"}, - {33, "R5=pkt(id=4,off=18,r=22,umax_value=2040,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fc))"}, + {33, "R4=pkt(id=4,off=22,r=22,umax_value=2040,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fc)"}, + {33, "R5=pkt(id=4,off=18,r=22,umax_value=2040,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fc)"}, }, }, { @@ -410,15 +410,15 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { /* Adding 14 makes R6 be (4n+2) */ {9, "R6_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=14,umax_value=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc))"}, /* Packet pointer has (4n+2) offset */ - {11, "R5_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=14,umax_value=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc))"}, - {13, "R4=pkt(id=1,off=4,r=0,umin_value=14,umax_value=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc))"}, + {11, "R5_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=14,umax_value=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc)"}, + {13, "R4=pkt(id=1,off=4,r=0,umin_value=14,umax_value=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc)"}, /* At the time the word size load is performed from R5, * its total fixed offset is NET_IP_ALIGN + reg->off (0) * which is 2. Then the variable offset is (4n+2), so * the total offset is 4-byte aligned and meets the * load's requirements. */ - {15, "R5=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=4,umin_value=14,umax_value=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc))"}, + {15, "R5=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=4,umin_value=14,umax_value=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc)"}, /* Newly read value in R6 was shifted left by 2, so has * known alignment of 4. */ @@ -426,15 +426,15 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { /* Added (4n) to packet pointer's (4n+2) var_off, giving * another (4n+2). */ - {19, "R5_w=pkt(id=2,off=0,r=0,umin_value=14,umax_value=2054,var_off=(0x2; 0xffc))"}, - {21, "R4=pkt(id=2,off=4,r=0,umin_value=14,umax_value=2054,var_off=(0x2; 0xffc))"}, + {19, "R5_w=pkt(id=2,off=0,r=0,umin_value=14,umax_value=2054,var_off=(0x2; 0xffc)"}, + {21, "R4=pkt(id=2,off=4,r=0,umin_value=14,umax_value=2054,var_off=(0x2; 0xffc)"}, /* At the time the word size load is performed from R5, * its total fixed offset is NET_IP_ALIGN + reg->off (0) * which is 2. Then the variable offset is (4n+2), so * the total offset is 4-byte aligned and meets the * load's requirements. */ - {23, "R5=pkt(id=2,off=0,r=4,umin_value=14,umax_value=2054,var_off=(0x2; 0xffc))"}, + {23, "R5=pkt(id=2,off=0,r=4,umin_value=14,umax_value=2054,var_off=(0x2; 0xffc)"}, }, }, { @@ -469,11 +469,11 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { .matches = { {4, "R5_w=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0)"}, /* (ptr - ptr) << 2 == unknown, (4n) */ - {6, "R5_w=inv(id=0,smax_value=9223372036854775804,umax_value=18446744073709551612,var_off=(0x0; 0xfffffffffffffffc))"}, + {6, "R5_w=inv(id=0,smax_value=9223372036854775804,umax_value=18446744073709551612,var_off=(0x0; 0xfffffffffffffffc)"}, /* (4n) + 14 == (4n+2). We blow our bounds, because * the add could overflow. */ - {7, "R5_w=inv(id=0,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffffffffffc))"}, + {7, "R5_w=inv(id=0,smin_value=-9223372036854775806,smax_value=9223372036854775806,umin_value=2,umax_value=18446744073709551614,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffffffffffc)"}, /* Checked s>=0 */ {9, "R5=inv(id=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, /* packet pointer + nonnegative (4n+2) */ @@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { /* New unknown value in R7 is (4n) */ {11, "R7_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, /* Subtracting it from R6 blows our unsigned bounds */ - {12, "R6=inv(id=0,smin_value=-1006,smax_value=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffffffffffc))"}, + {12, "R6=inv(id=0,smin_value=-1006,smax_value=1034,umin_value=2,umax_value=18446744073709551614,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffffffffffc)"}, /* Checked s>= 0 */ {14, "R6=inv(id=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc))"}, /* At the time the word size load is performed from R5, @@ -537,7 +537,8 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { * the total offset is 4-byte aligned and meets the * load's requirements. */ - {20, "R5=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=4,umin_value=2,umax_value=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc))"}, + {20, "R5=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=4,umin_value=2,umax_value=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc)"}, + }, }, { diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c index 3d617e806054..a821ff121e03 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c @@ -920,6 +920,34 @@ static struct btf_raw_test raw_tests[] = { .btf_load_err = true, .err_str = "Invalid elem", }, +{ + .descr = "var after datasec, ptr followed by modifier", + .raw_types = { + /* .bss section */ /* [1] */ + BTF_TYPE_ENC(NAME_TBD, BTF_INFO_ENC(BTF_KIND_DATASEC, 0, 2), + sizeof(void*)+4), + BTF_VAR_SECINFO_ENC(4, 0, sizeof(void*)), + BTF_VAR_SECINFO_ENC(6, sizeof(void*), 4), + /* int */ /* [2] */ + BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(0, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 32, 4), + /* int* */ /* [3] */ + BTF_TYPE_ENC(0, BTF_INFO_ENC(BTF_KIND_PTR, 0, 0), 2), + BTF_VAR_ENC(NAME_TBD, 3, 0), /* [4] */ + /* const int */ /* [5] */ + BTF_TYPE_ENC(0, BTF_INFO_ENC(BTF_KIND_CONST, 0, 0), 2), + BTF_VAR_ENC(NAME_TBD, 5, 0), /* [6] */ + BTF_END_RAW, + }, + .str_sec = "\0a\0b\0c\0", + .str_sec_size = sizeof("\0a\0b\0c\0"), + .map_type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, + .map_name = ".bss", + .key_size = sizeof(int), + .value_size = sizeof(void*)+4, + .key_type_id = 0, + .value_type_id = 1, + .max_entries = 1, +}, /* Test member exceeds the size of struct. * * struct A { @@ -4635,6 +4663,7 @@ static size_t get_pprint_mapv_size(enum pprint_mapv_kind_t mapv_kind) #endif assert(0); + return 0; } static void set_pprint_mapv(enum pprint_mapv_kind_t mapv_kind, @@ -4808,7 +4837,7 @@ static int do_test_pprint(int test_num) ret = snprintf(pin_path, sizeof(pin_path), "%s/%s", "/sys/fs/bpf", test->map_name); - if (CHECK(ret == sizeof(pin_path), "pin_path %s/%s is too long", + if (CHECK(ret >= sizeof(pin_path), "pin_path %s/%s is too long", "/sys/fs/bpf", test->map_name)) { err = -1; goto done; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 43224c5ec1e9..1bd285dc55e9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -1091,6 +1091,19 @@ static void get_unpriv_disabled() static bool test_as_unpriv(struct bpf_test *test) { +#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS + /* Some architectures have strict alignment requirements. In + * that case, the BPF verifier detects if a program has + * unaligned accesses and rejects them. A user can pass + * BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT to a program to override this + * check. That, however, will only work when a privileged user + * loads a program. An unprivileged user loading a program + * with this flag will be rejected prior entering the + * verifier. + */ + if (test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) + return false; +#endif return !test->prog_type || test->prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER || test->prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c index 92c02e4a1b62..313b345eddcc 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c @@ -411,16 +411,14 @@ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_1, 31), /* r1 = 0xffff'fffe (NOT 0!) */ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, 2), - /* computes OOB pointer */ + /* error on computing OOB pointer */ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), - /* OOB access */ - BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), /* exit */ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, - .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access", + .errstr = "math between map_value pointer and 4294967294 is not allowed", .result = REJECT, }, { diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/search_pruning.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/search_pruning.c index 7e50cb80873a..7e36078f8f48 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/search_pruning.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/search_pruning.c @@ -154,3 +154,39 @@ .result_unpriv = ACCEPT, .insn_processed = 15, }, +/* The test performs a conditional 64-bit write to a stack location + * fp[-8], this is followed by an unconditional 8-bit write to fp[-8], + * then data is read from fp[-8]. This sequence is unsafe. + * + * The test would be mistakenly marked as safe w/o dst register parent + * preservation in verifier.c:copy_register_state() function. + * + * Note the usage of BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ to force creation of the + * checkpoint state after conditional 64-bit assignment. + */ +{ + "write tracking and register parent chain bug", + .insns = { + /* r6 = ktime_get_ns() */ + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_ktime_get_ns), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0), + /* r0 = ktime_get_ns() */ + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_ktime_get_ns), + /* if r0 > r6 goto +1 */ + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6, 1), + /* *(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = 0xdeadbeef */ + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, -8, 0xdeadbeef), + /* r1 = 42 */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 42), + /* *(u8 *)(r10 - 8) = r1 */ + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_1, -8), + /* r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 8) */ + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_FP, -8), + /* exit(0) */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ, + .errstr = "invalid read from stack off -8+1 size 8", + .result = REJECT, +}, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sock.c index 9ed192e14f5f..b2ce50bb935b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sock.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sock.c @@ -121,7 +121,25 @@ .result = ACCEPT, }, { - "sk_fullsock(skb->sk): sk->dst_port [narrow load]", + "sk_fullsock(skb->sk): sk->dst_port [word load] (backward compatibility)", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_fullsock), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct bpf_sock, dst_port)), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, + .result = ACCEPT, +}, +{ + "sk_fullsock(skb->sk): sk->dst_port [half load]", .insns = { BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)), BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2), @@ -139,7 +157,64 @@ .result = ACCEPT, }, { - "sk_fullsock(skb->sk): sk->dst_port [load 2nd byte]", + "sk_fullsock(skb->sk): sk->dst_port [half load] (invalid)", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_fullsock), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct bpf_sock, dst_port) + 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "invalid sock access", +}, +{ + "sk_fullsock(skb->sk): sk->dst_port [byte load]", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_fullsock), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct bpf_sock, dst_port)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct bpf_sock, dst_port) + 1), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, + .result = ACCEPT, +}, +{ + "sk_fullsock(skb->sk): sk->dst_port [byte load] (invalid)", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_fullsock), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct bpf_sock, dst_port) + 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "invalid sock access", +}, +{ + "sk_fullsock(skb->sk): past sk->dst_port [half load] (invalid)", .insns = { BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)), BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2), @@ -149,7 +224,7 @@ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), - BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct bpf_sock, dst_port) + 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, offsetofend(struct bpf_sock, dst_port)), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, |