| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The various floating point test programs written in assembly have a bunch
of helper functions and macros which are cut'n'pasted between them. Factor
them out into a separate source file which is linked into all of them.
We don't include memcmp() since it isn't as generic as it should be and
directly branches to report an error in the programs.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211019181851.3341232-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Add a test that covers enabling and disabling of SVE vector length
inheritance via the ptrace interface.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211005123537.976795-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
As part of the enumeration interface for setting vector lengths it is valid
to set vector lengths not supported in the system, these will be rounded to
a supported vector length and returned from the prctl(). Add a test which
exercises this for every valid vector length and makes sure that the return
value is as expected and that this is reflected in the actual system state.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210929151925.9601-5-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
We had some test code for verifying that we can write the current VL via
the prctl() interface but the condition for the test was inverted which
wasn't noticed as it was never actually hooked up to the array of tests
we execute. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210929151925.9601-4-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Due to some refactoring with the error handling we ended up mangling things
so we never actually set ret and therefore shouldn't be checking it.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210929151925.9601-3-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
The format for this error message calls for the plain text version of the
error but we weren't supply it.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210929151925.9601-2-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Now that all the other tests are in functions rather than inline in the
main parent process function also move the test for accessing the FPSIMD
registers via the SVE regset out into their own function.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210913125505.52619-9-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently the selftest for the SVE register set is not quite as thorough
as is desirable - it only validates that the value of a single Z register
is not modified by a partial write to a lower numbered Z register after
having previously been set through the FPSIMD regset.
Make this more thorough:
- Test the ability to set vector lengths and enumerate those supported in
the system.
- Validate data in all Z and P registers, plus FPSR and FPCR.
- Test reads via the FPSIMD regset after set via the SVE regset.
There's still some oversights, the main one being that due to the need to
generate a pattern in FFR and the fact that this rewrite is primarily
motivated by SME's streaming SVE which doesn't have FFR we don't currently
test FFR. Update the TODO to reflect those that occurred to me (and fix an
adjacent typo in there).
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210913125505.52619-8-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
After setting the FPSIMD registers via the SVE register set read them back
via the FPSIMD register set, validating that the two register sets are
interoperating and that the values we thought we set made it into the
child process.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210913125505.52619-7-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
When verifying setting a Z register via ptrace we check each byte by hand,
iterating over the buffer using a pointer called p and treating each
register value written as a test. This creates output referring to "p[X]"
which is confusing since SVE also has predicate registers Pn. Tweak the
output to avoid confusion here.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210913125505.52619-6-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Before we go modifying it further let's add some comments and output
clarifications explaining what this test is actually doing.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210913125505.52619-5-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
For some reason the SVE ptrace test code starts off by setting values in
some of the SVE vector registers in the parent process which it then never
interacts with when verifying the ptrace interfaces. This is not especially
relevant to what's being tested and somewhat confusing when reading the
code so let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210913125505.52619-4-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently we log the creation of the child process as a test but it's not
really relevant to what we're trying to test and can make the output a
little confusing so don't do that.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210913125505.52619-3-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Partly in preparation for future refactoring move from hard coding the
number of tests in main() to putting #define at the top of the source
instead.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210913125505.52619-2-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
During initialization of a signal testcase, features declared as required
are properly checked against the running system but no action is then taken
to effectively skip such a testcase.
Fix core signals test logic to abort initialization and report such a
testcase as skipped to the KSelfTest framework.
Fixes: f96bf4340316 ("kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_invalid_compat_toggle and common utils")
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210920121228.35368-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
Note down a few gaps in our coverage.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819134245.13935-7-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
Currently this doesn't actually verify that the register contents do the
right thing, it just verifes that a SVE context with appropriate size
appears.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819134245.13935-6-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
We do not support changing the SVE vector length as part of signal return,
verify that this is the case if the system supports multiple vector lengths.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819134245.13935-5-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
As a basic check that the SVE signal frame is being set up correctly
verify that the vector length in the signal frame is the vector length
that the process has.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819134245.13935-4-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
A signal frame with SVE may validly either be a bare struct sve_context or
a struct sve_context followed by vector length dependent register data.
Support either in the generic helpers for the signal tests, and while we're
at it validate the SVE vector length reported.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819134245.13935-3-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
Allow testcases for SVE signal handling to flag the dependency and be
skipped on systems without SVE support.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819134245.13935-2-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
The PAC tests check to see if the system supports the relevant PAC features
but instead of skipping the tests if they can't be executed they fail the
tests which makes things look like they're not working when they are.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819165723.43903-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
When skipping the tests due to a lack of system support for MTE we
currently print a message saying FAIL which makes it look like the test
failed even though the test did actually report KSFT_SKIP, creating some
confusion. Change the error message to say SKIP instead so things are
clearer.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819172902.56211-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
Write down some ideas for additional coverage for floating point in case
someone feels inspired to look into them.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210803140450.46624-5-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
We provide interfaces for configuring the SVE vector length seen by
processes using prctl and also via /proc for configuring the default
values. Provide tests that exercise all these interfaces and verify that
they take effect as expected, though at present no test fully enumerates
all the possible vector lengths.
A subset of this is already tested via sve-probe-vls but the /proc
interfaces are not currently covered at all.
In preparation for the forthcoming support for SME, the Scalable Matrix
Extension, which has separately but similarly configured vector lengths
which we expect to offer similar userspace interfaces for, all the actual
files and prctls used are parameterised and we don't validate that the
architectural minimum vector length is the minimum we see.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210803140450.46624-4-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
Currently sve-probe-vls does not verify that the vector lengths reported
by the prctl() interface are actually what is reported by the architecture,
use the rdvl_sve() helper to validate this.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210803140450.46624-3-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
SVE provides an instruction RDVL which reports the currently configured
vector length. In order to validate that our vector length configuration
interfaces are working correctly without having to build the C code for
our test programs with SVE enabled provide a trivial assembly library
with a C callable function that executes RDVL. Since these interfaces
also control behaviour on exec*() provide a trivial wrapper program which
reports the currently configured vector length on stdout, tests can use
this to verify that behaviour on exec*() is as expected.
In preparation for providing similar helper functionality for SME, the
Scalable Matrix Extension, which allows separately configured vector
lengths to be read back both the assembler function and wrapper binary
have SVE included in their name.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210803140450.46624-2-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
We added check_gcr_el1_cswitch but did not ignore the generated binary,
add it.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210728173539.6231-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
The newline is expected to come from the caller but got missed for this
test.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210518163331.38268-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Explicitly include stddef.h when building the BTI tests so that we have
a definition of NULL, with at least some toolchains this is not done
implicitly by anything else:
test.c: In function ‘start’:
test.c:214:25: error: ‘NULL’ undeclared (first use in this function)
214 | sigaction(SIGILL, &sa, NULL);
| ^~~~
test.c:20:1: note: ‘NULL’ is defined in header ‘<stddef.h>’; did you forget to ‘#include <stddef.h>’?
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210507162542.23149-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux
Pull arm64 updates from Catalin Marinas:
- MTE asynchronous support for KASan. Previously only synchronous
(slower) mode was supported. Asynchronous is faster but does not
allow precise identification of the illegal access.
- Run kernel mode SIMD with softirqs disabled. This allows using NEON
in softirq context for crypto performance improvements. The
conditional yield support is modified to take softirqs into account
and reduce the latency.
- Preparatory patches for Apple M1: handle CPUs that only have the VHE
mode available (host kernel running at EL2), add FIQ support.
- arm64 perf updates: support for HiSilicon PA and SLLC PMU drivers,
new functions for the HiSilicon HHA and L3C PMU, cleanups.
- Re-introduce support for execute-only user permissions but only when
the EPAN (Enhanced Privileged Access Never) architecture feature is
available.
- Disable fine-grained traps at boot and improve the documented boot
requirements.
- Support CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC on arm64 (only with KASAN_GENERIC).
- Add hierarchical eXecute Never permissions for all page tables.
- Add arm64 prctl(PR_PAC_{SET,GET}_ENABLED_KEYS) allowing user programs
to control which PAC keys are enabled in a particular task.
- arm64 kselftests for BTI and some improvements to the MTE tests.
- Minor improvements to the compat vdso and sigpage.
- Miscellaneous cleanups.
* tag 'arm64-upstream' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux: (86 commits)
arm64/sve: Add compile time checks for SVE hooks in generic functions
arm64/kernel/probes: Use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG.
arm64: pac: Optimize kernel entry/exit key installation code paths
arm64: Introduce prctl(PR_PAC_{SET,GET}_ENABLED_KEYS)
arm64: mte: make the per-task SCTLR_EL1 field usable elsewhere
arm64/sve: Remove redundant system_supports_sve() tests
arm64: fpsimd: run kernel mode NEON with softirqs disabled
arm64: assembler: introduce wxN aliases for wN registers
arm64: assembler: remove conditional NEON yield macros
kasan, arm64: tests supports for HW_TAGS async mode
arm64: mte: Report async tag faults before suspend
arm64: mte: Enable async tag check fault
arm64: mte: Conditionally compile mte_enable_kernel_*()
arm64: mte: Enable TCO in functions that can read beyond buffer limits
kasan: Add report for async mode
arm64: mte: Drop arch_enable_tagging()
kasan: Add KASAN mode kernel parameter
arm64: mte: Add asynchronous mode support
arm64: Get rid of CONFIG_ARM64_VHE
arm64: Cope with CPUs stuck in VHE mode
...
|
|
Add some tests that verify that BTI functions correctly for static binaries
built with and without BTI support, verifying that SIGILL is generated when
expected and is not generated in other situations.
Since BTI support is still being rolled out in distributions these tests
are built entirely free standing, no libc support is used at all so none
of the standard helper functions for kselftest can be used and we open
code everything. This also means we aren't testing the kernel support for
the dynamic linker, though the test program can be readily adapted for
that once it becomes something that we can reliably build and run.
These tests were originally written by Dave Martin, I've adapted them for
kselftest, mainly around the build system and the output format.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210309193731.57247-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
The MTE selftests create temporary files in /dev/shm, for later mmap-ing
them. When there is no tmpfs mounted on /dev/shm, or /dev/shm does not
exist in the first place (on minimal filesystems), the error message is
not giving good hints:
# FAIL: Unable to open temporary file
# FAIL: memory allocation
not ok 17 Check initial tags with private mapping, ...
Add a perror() call, that gives both the filename and the actual error
reason, so that users get a chance of correcting that.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broone@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319165334.29213-12-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
if (!prctl(...) == 0) is not only cumbersome to read, it also upsets
clang and triggers a warning:
------------
mte_common_util.c:287:6: warning: logical not is only applied to the
left hand side of this comparison [-Wlogical-not-parentheses]
....
Fix that by just comparing against "not 0" instead.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broone@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319165334.29213-11-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
When clang finds a header file on the command line, it wants to
precompile that, which would end up in a separate output file.
Specifying -o on that same command line collides with that effort, so
the compiler complains:
clang: error: cannot specify -o when generating multiple output files
Since we are not really after a precompiled header, just drop the header
file from the command line, by removing it from the list of source
files in the Makefile.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broone@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319165334.29213-10-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
At the moment we check the compiler's ability to compile MTE enabled
code, but guard all the Makefile rules by it. As a consequence a broken
or not capable compiler just doesn't do anything, and make happily
returns without any error message, but with no programs created.
Since the MTE feature is only supported by recent aarch64 compilers (not
all stable distro compilers support it), having an explicit message
seems like a good idea. To not break building multiple targets, we let
make proceed without errors.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broone@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319165334.29213-9-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
At the moment we either need to provide CC explicitly, or use a native
machine to get the ARM64 MTE selftest compiled.
It seems useful to use the same (cross-)compiler as we use for the
kernel, so copy the recipe we use in the pauth selftest.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broone@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319165334.29213-8-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
To check whether the CPU and kernel support the MTE features we want
to test, we use an (emulated) CPU ID register read. However we only
check against a very particular feature version (0b0010), even though
the ARM ARM promises ID register features to be backwards compatible.
While this could be fixed by using ">=" instead of "==", we should
actually use the explicit HWCAP2_MTE hardware capability, exposed by the
kernel via the ELF auxiliary vectors.
That moves this responsibility to the kernel, and fixes running the
tests on machines with FEAT_MTE3 capability.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broone@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319165334.29213-7-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
Out of the box Ubuntu's 20.04 compiler warns about missing return value
checks for write() (sys)calls.
Make GCC happy by checking whether we actually managed to write out our
buffer.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broone@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319165334.29213-6-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
Out of the box Ubuntu's 20.04 compiler warns about missing return value
checks for write() (sys)calls.
Make GCC happy by checking whether we actually managed to write "val".
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broone@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319165334.29213-5-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
Out of the box Ubuntu's 20.04 compiler warns about missing return value
checks for fscanf() calls.
Make GCC happy by checking whether we actually parsed one integer.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broone@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319165334.29213-4-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
The GCC manual suggests to use -pthread, when linking with the PThread
library, also to add this switch to both the compilation and linking
stages.
Do as the manual says, to fix compilation with Ubuntu's 20.04 toolchain,
which was getting -lpthread too early on the command line:
------------
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/cc5zbo2A.o: in function `execute_test':
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_gcr_el1_cswitch.c:86:
undefined reference to `pthread_create'
/usr/bin/ld: tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_gcr_el1_cswitch.c:90:
undefined reference to `pthread_join'
------------
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broone@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319165334.29213-3-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
The mte selftest Makefile contains a check for GCC, to add the memtag
-march flag to the compiler options. This check fails if the compiler
is not explicitly specified, so reverts to the standard "cc", in which
case --version doesn't mention the "gcc" string we match against:
$ cc --version | head -n 1
cc (Ubuntu 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04) 9.3.0
This will not add the -march switch to the command line, so compilation
fails:
mte_helper.S: Assembler messages:
mte_helper.S:25: Error: selected processor does not support `irg x0,x0,xzr'
mte_helper.S:38: Error: selected processor does not support `gmi x1,x0,xzr'
...
Actually clang accepts the same -march option as well, so we can just
drop this check and add this unconditionally to the command line, to avoid
any future issues with this check altogether (gcc actually prints
basename(argv[0]) when called with --version).
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broone@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319165334.29213-2-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
The "First Fault Register" (FFR) is an SVE register that mimics a
predicate register, but clears bits when a load or store fails to handle
an element of a vector. The supposed usage scenario is to initialise
this register (using SETFFR), then *read* it later on to learn about
elements that failed to load or store. Explicit writes to this register
using the WRFFR instruction are only supposed to *restore* values
previously read from the register (for context-switching only).
As the manual describes, this register holds only certain values, it:
"... contains a monotonic predicate value, in which starting from bit 0
there are zero or more 1 bits, followed only by 0 bits in any remaining
bit positions."
Any other value is UNPREDICTABLE and is not supposed to be "restored"
into the register.
The SVE test currently tries to write a signature pattern into the
register, which is *not* a canonical FFR value. Apparently the existing
setups treat UNPREDICTABLE as "read-as-written", but a new
implementation actually only stores canonical values. As a consequence,
the sve-test fails immediately when comparing the FFR value:
-----------
# ./sve-test
Vector length: 128 bits
PID: 207
Mismatch: PID=207, iteration=0, reg=48
Expected [cf00]
Got [0f00]
Aborted
-----------
Fix this by only populating the FFR with proper canonical values.
Effectively the requirement described above limits us to 17 unique
values over 16 bits worth of FFR, so we condense our signature down to 4
bits (2 bits from the PID, 2 bits from the generation) and generate the
canonical pattern from it. Any bits describing elements above the
minimum 128 bit are set to 0.
This aligns the FFR usage to the architecture and fixes the test on
microarchitectures implementing FFR in a more restricted way.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviwed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319120128.29452-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
We track if sve-ptrace encountered a failure in a variable but don't
actually use that value when we exit the program, do so.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210309190304.39169-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Fix the following coccicheck warning:
./tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_buffer_fill.c:84:12-35:
WARNING: Comparison to bool
Signed-off-by: YANG LI <abaci-bugfix@linux.alibaba.com>
Reported-by: Abaci Robot<abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1610357737-68678-1-git-send-email-abaci-bugfix@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
The SVE and FPSIMD stress tests have a spelling mistake in the output, fix
it.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210108183144.673-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
This test is specific to MTE and verifies that the GCR_EL1 register is
context switched correctly.
It spawns 1024 processes and each process spawns 5 threads. Each thread
writes a random setting of GCR_EL1 through the prctl() system call and
reads it back verifying that it is the same. If the values are not the
same it reports a failure.
Note: The test has been extended to verify that even SYNC and ASYNC mode
setting is preserved correctly over context switching.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/b51a165426e906e7ec8a68d806ef3f8cd92581a6.1606161801.git.andreyknvl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@arm.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>
Cc: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The check_user_mem test reports the error below because the test
plan is not declared correctly:
# Planned tests != run tests (0 != 4)
Fix the test adding the correct test plan declaration.
Fixes: 4dafc08d0ba4 ("kselftest/arm64: Check mte tagged user address in kernel")
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Gabor Kertesz <gabor.kertesz@arm.com>
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026121248.2340-7-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
The check_ksm_options test reports the error below because the test
plan is not declared correctly:
# Planned tests != run tests (0 != 4)
Fix the test adding the correct test plan declaration.
Fixes: f981d8fa2646 ("kselftest/arm64: Verify KSM page merge for MTE pages")
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Gabor Kertesz <gabor.kertesz@arm.com>
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026121248.2340-6-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
Mark Brown
Cristian Marussi
Linus Torvalds
Andre Przywara
YANG LI
Vincenzo Frascino