Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Just a style fix, no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit aace7367bf83aef7baa021c7bcc9d2e331b040aa)
Signed-off-by: Voon, Weifeng <weifeng.voon@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
|
|
gcc-4.4.4 has problems with initialization of anonymous unions:
drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c:30: error: unknown field 'value' specified in initializer
work around this by crafting the initializers in a manner which the
compiler can handle.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit d76eebfa175e86383324ad2bbaf472866950398b)
Signed-off-by: Voon, Weifeng <weifeng.voon@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
|
|
It is convenient if the property set associated with the device secondary
firmware node is a copy of the original. This allows passing property set
from a stack for example for devices created dynamically. This also ties
the property set lifetime to the associated device.
Because of that we provide new function device_remove_property_set() that
is used to disassociate and release memory allocated for the property set.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 13141e1cb842ad6286c1cfa9a6b7c1577478d03b)
Signed-off-by: Voon, Weifeng <weifeng.voon@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
|
|
There is no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1d656fb757c17e48a8a01bd576d14918701ba55c)
Signed-off-by: Voon, Weifeng <weifeng.voon@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
|
|
Sometimes it is useful to be able to extract an index of certain string
value from an array of strings. A typical use case is to give a name to a
DMA channel, PWM, clock and so on.
Provide an implementation using unified device property accessors that
follows of_property_match_string() but works for all supported fwnodes.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3f5c8d3187852b1cbed8546169e6293d6d421751)
Signed-off-by: Voon, Weifeng <weifeng.voon@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
|
|
Marcos for easier creation of build-in property entries.
Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit a85f420475334caed12b057ddcaa0b58e0b1ebb7)
Signed-off-by: Voon, Weifeng <weifeng.voon@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
|
|
We may save a lot of lines of code and space by keeping single values inside
the struct property_entry. Refactor the implementation to do so.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 66586baba56679baa2da1a10a96ccf15b1e96b95)
Signed-off-by: Voon, Weifeng <weifeng.voon@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
|
|
Instead of using the type and nval fields we will use length (in bytes) of the
value. The sanity check is done in the accessors.
The built-in property accessors are split in the same way such as device tree.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 318a1971826103ecf560875b17236dd4a93e8c88)
Signed-off-by: Voon, Weifeng <weifeng.voon@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
|
|
Introduce data structures and code allowing "built-in" properties
to be associated with devices in such a way that they will be used
by the device_property_* API if no proper firmware node (neither DT
nor ACPI) is present for the given device.
Each property is to be represented by a property_entry structure.
An array of property_entry structures (terminated with a null
entry) can be pointed to by the properties field of struct
property_set that can be added as a firmware node to a struct
device using device_add_property_set(). That will cause the
device_property_* API to use that property_set as the source
of properties if the given device does not have a DT node or
an ACPI companion device object associated with it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Now that we have struct fwnode_handle, we can use that to point to
ACPI companions from struct device objects instead of pointing to
struct acpi_device directly.
There are two benefits from that. First, the somewhat ugly and
hackish struct acpi_dev_node can be dropped and, second, the same
struct fwnode_handle pointer can be used in the future to point
to other (non-ACPI) firmware device node types.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
|
|
Add new generic routines are provided for retrieving properties from
device description objects in the platform firmware in case there are
no struct device objects for them (either those objects have not been
created yet or they do not exist at all).
The following functions are provided:
fwnode_property_present()
fwnode_property_read_u8()
fwnode_property_read_u16()
fwnode_property_read_u32()
fwnode_property_read_u64()
fwnode_property_read_string()
fwnode_property_read_u8_array()
fwnode_property_read_u16_array()
fwnode_property_read_u32_array()
fwnode_property_read_u64_array()
fwnode_property_read_string_array()
in analogy with the corresponding functions for struct device added
previously. For all of them, the first argument is a pointer to struct
fwnode_handle (new type) that allows a device description object
(depending on what platform firmware interface is in use) to be
obtained.
Add a new macro device_for_each_child_node() for iterating over the
children of the device description object associated with a given
device and a new function device_get_child_node_count() returning the
number of a given device's child nodes.
The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees.
Suggested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Add a uniform interface by which device drivers can request device
properties from the platform firmware by providing a property name
and the corresponding data type. The purpose of it is to help to
write portable code that won't depend on any particular platform
firmware interface.
The following general helper functions are added:
device_property_present()
device_property_read_u8()
device_property_read_u16()
device_property_read_u32()
device_property_read_u64()
device_property_read_string()
device_property_read_u8_array()
device_property_read_u16_array()
device_property_read_u32_array()
device_property_read_u64_array()
device_property_read_string_array()
The first one allows the caller to check if the given property is
present. The next 5 of them allow single-valued properties of
various types to be retrieved in a uniform way. The remaining 5 are
for reading properties with multiple values (arrays of either numbers
or strings).
The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees.
This change set includes material from Mika Westerberg and Aaron Lu.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|