1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
|
From b4798087078ac666f89859028629d3d06efd736b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 17:16:32 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 3819/4256] drm/amdgpu:Fix EEPROM checksum calculation.
Fix checksum calculation after manually resetting the table.
Unify reset and empty EEPROM init flow.
Protect the table reset with lock.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@amd.com>
---
.../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c | 164 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
index 11a8445cf734..d0e020ef73e3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
@@ -100,22 +100,100 @@ static int __update_table_header(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
return ret;
}
-static uint32_t __calc_hdr_byte_sum(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control);
+
+
+static uint32_t __calc_hdr_byte_sum(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control)
+{
+ int i;
+ uint32_t tbl_sum = 0;
+
+ /* Header checksum, skip checksum field in the calculation */
+ for (i = 0; i < sizeof(control->tbl_hdr) - sizeof(control->tbl_hdr.checksum); i++)
+ tbl_sum += *(((unsigned char *)&control->tbl_hdr) + i);
+
+ return tbl_sum;
+}
+
+static uint32_t __calc_recs_byte_sum(struct eeprom_table_record *records,
+ int num)
+{
+ int i, j;
+ uint32_t tbl_sum = 0;
+
+ /* Records checksum */
+ for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
+ struct eeprom_table_record *record = &records[i];
+
+ for (j = 0; j < sizeof(*record); j++) {
+ tbl_sum += *(((unsigned char *)record) + j);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return tbl_sum;
+}
+
+static inline uint32_t __calc_tbl_byte_sum(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
+ struct eeprom_table_record *records, int num)
+{
+ return __calc_hdr_byte_sum(control) + __calc_recs_byte_sum(records, num);
+}
+
+/* Checksum = 256 -((sum of all table entries) mod 256) */
+static void __update_tbl_checksum(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
+ struct eeprom_table_record *records, int num,
+ uint32_t old_hdr_byte_sum)
+{
+ /*
+ * This will update the table sum with new records.
+ *
+ * TODO: What happens when the EEPROM table is to be wrapped around
+ * and old records from start will get overridden.
+ */
+
+ /* need to recalculate updated header byte sum */
+ control->tbl_byte_sum -= old_hdr_byte_sum;
+ control->tbl_byte_sum += __calc_tbl_byte_sum(control, records, num);
+
+ control->tbl_hdr.checksum = 256 - (control->tbl_byte_sum % 256);
+}
+
+/* table sum mod 256 + checksum must equals 256 */
+static bool __validate_tbl_checksum(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
+ struct eeprom_table_record *records, int num)
+{
+ control->tbl_byte_sum = __calc_tbl_byte_sum(control, records, num);
+
+ if (control->tbl_hdr.checksum + (control->tbl_byte_sum % 256) != 256) {
+ DRM_WARN("Checksum mismatch, checksum: %u ", control->tbl_hdr.checksum);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_reset_table(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control)
{
unsigned char buff[EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE + EEPROM_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE] = { 0 };
- struct amdgpu_device *adev = to_amdgpu_device(control);
struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_table_header *hdr = &control->tbl_hdr;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ mutex_lock(&control->tbl_mutex);
hdr->header = EEPROM_TABLE_HDR_VAL;
hdr->version = EEPROM_TABLE_VER;
hdr->first_rec_offset = EEPROM_RECORD_START;
hdr->tbl_size = EEPROM_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE;
- adev->psp.ras.ras->eeprom_control.tbl_byte_sum =
- __calc_hdr_byte_sum(&adev->psp.ras.ras->eeprom_control);
- return __update_table_header(control, buff);
+ control->tbl_byte_sum = 0;
+ __update_tbl_checksum(control, NULL, 0, 0);
+ control->next_addr = EEPROM_RECORD_START;
+
+ ret = __update_table_header(control, buff);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&control->tbl_mutex);
+
+ return ret;
+
}
int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_init(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control)
@@ -159,6 +237,9 @@ int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_init(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control)
if (hdr->header == EEPROM_TABLE_HDR_VAL) {
control->num_recs = (hdr->tbl_size - EEPROM_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE) /
EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE;
+ control->tbl_byte_sum = __calc_hdr_byte_sum(control);
+ control->next_addr = EEPROM_RECORD_START;
+
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Found existing EEPROM table with %d records",
control->num_recs);
@@ -168,9 +249,6 @@ int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_init(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control)
ret = amdgpu_ras_eeprom_reset_table(control);
}
- /* Start inserting records from here */
- adev->psp.ras.ras->eeprom_control.next_addr = EEPROM_RECORD_START;
-
return ret == 1 ? 0 : -EIO;
}
@@ -275,76 +353,6 @@ static uint32_t __correct_eeprom_dest_address(uint32_t curr_address)
return curr_address;
}
-
-static uint32_t __calc_hdr_byte_sum(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control)
-{
- int i;
- uint32_t tbl_sum = 0;
-
- /* Header checksum, skip checksum field in the calculation */
- for (i = 0; i < sizeof(control->tbl_hdr) - sizeof(control->tbl_hdr.checksum); i++)
- tbl_sum += *(((unsigned char *)&control->tbl_hdr) + i);
-
- return tbl_sum;
-}
-
-static uint32_t __calc_recs_byte_sum(struct eeprom_table_record *records,
- int num)
-{
- int i, j;
- uint32_t tbl_sum = 0;
-
- /* Records checksum */
- for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
- struct eeprom_table_record *record = &records[i];
-
- for (j = 0; j < sizeof(*record); j++) {
- tbl_sum += *(((unsigned char *)record) + j);
- }
- }
-
- return tbl_sum;
-}
-
-static inline uint32_t __calc_tbl_byte_sum(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
- struct eeprom_table_record *records, int num)
-{
- return __calc_hdr_byte_sum(control) + __calc_recs_byte_sum(records, num);
-}
-
-/* Checksum = 256 -((sum of all table entries) mod 256) */
-static void __update_tbl_checksum(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
- struct eeprom_table_record *records, int num,
- uint32_t old_hdr_byte_sum)
-{
- /*
- * This will update the table sum with new records.
- *
- * TODO: What happens when the EEPROM table is to be wrapped around
- * and old records from start will get overridden.
- */
-
- /* need to recalculate updated header byte sum */
- control->tbl_byte_sum -= old_hdr_byte_sum;
- control->tbl_byte_sum += __calc_tbl_byte_sum(control, records, num);
-
- control->tbl_hdr.checksum = 256 - (control->tbl_byte_sum % 256);
-}
-
-/* table sum mod 256 + checksum must equals 256 */
-static bool __validate_tbl_checksum(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
- struct eeprom_table_record *records, int num)
-{
- control->tbl_byte_sum = __calc_tbl_byte_sum(control, records, num);
-
- if (control->tbl_hdr.checksum + (control->tbl_byte_sum % 256) != 256) {
- DRM_WARN("Checksum mismatch, checksum: %u ", control->tbl_hdr.checksum);
- return false;
- }
-
- return true;
-}
-
int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_process_recods(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
struct eeprom_table_record *records,
bool write,
--
2.17.1
|
