| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
pinctl is not ideal as pinctrl (with an 'r') is much more common. Linus
state that pin-control.rst would be the best name for the documentation.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20210126050817.GA187797@x1/#t
Suggested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Drew Fustini <drew@beagleboard.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210302053059.1049035-4-drew@beagleboard.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
The code in the example does not build for a few trivial errors: type
mismatch in callback, missing semicolon. Fix them to help newcomers using
the example as a starting point.
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190705143043.1929-1-luca@lucaceresoli.net
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
Returning -EAGAIN is no longer supported by pin_config_group_set()
since ad42fc6c8479 ("pinctrl: rip out the direct pinconf API")
Remove the relevant section from the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Ramon Fried <ramon.fried@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
The pinctrl_request_gpio() and pinctrl_free_gpio() break the nice
namespacing in the other cross-calls like pinctrl_gpio_foo().
Just rename them and all references so we have one namespace
with all cross-calls under pinctrl_gpio_*().
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
As pinctrl describes a feature from drivers/base, place it at
the right book.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
Drew Fustini
Luca Ceresoli
Ramon Fried
Linus Walleij
Mauro Carvalho Chehab