diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch | 7 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch b/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch index db3a70e803..4e6ca4132b 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch +++ b/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch @@ -10,6 +10,13 @@ Change suggested by Julian Taylor. Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757037 +RP: Patch is still in debian as of 20220524 in a revised form: +https://sources.debian.org/patches/lzo2/2.10-2/ +https://sources.debian.org/patches/lzo2/2.10-2/0001-Conditionally-replace-reinvention-of-memcpy-with-cal.patch/ + +We likely need this in OE to prevent against unaligned accesses +on systems such as armv5. + Upstream-Status: Pending Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> --- |