| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
LSB as a standard isn't current and isn't well suited to embedded
anyway. Its putting artifical constraints on the system and with modern
layer technology, would now be better off as its own layer. As such
its time to split it out.
The only part with some (marginal) usage is lsb_release,
which is split from the lsb package into an own lsb-release
package.
(From OE-Core rev: fb064356af615d67d85b65942103bf943d84d290)
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
GTK+ 2 is being removed from oe-core, so remove it from the oe-core LSB
packagegroup.
Also document the fact that GTK+ 2 is no longer part of the LSB packagegroup,
and point to meta-oe for the recipe if required.
(From OE-Core rev: 759af1d5a5c3a0abe907d3875a7f548a6edfb39a)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The situation with pax (vs. tar and cpio) is perfectly described here:
https://xkcd.com/927/
The only reason pax is still around, kind of, is because both POSIX and LSB
mandate it. Outside of those documents, it's not used by anyone.
Meanwhile, the upstream URI we've been taking it from went down, and rather
than seek an alternative source, I just went ahead and removed the recipe.
(From OE-Core rev: a62a7e11274c4965e122ed5bf01024cae8437af0)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
(From OE-Core rev: c96aa431f2f56d023b84d28e049065eef2a7490f)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
Adrian Bunk
Ross Burton
Alexander Kanavin