diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'meta/conf/distro/include/cve-extra-exclusions.inc')
-rw-r--r-- | meta/conf/distro/include/cve-extra-exclusions.inc | 75 |
1 files changed, 75 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/cve-extra-exclusions.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/cve-extra-exclusions.inc new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..f3490db9dd --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/cve-extra-exclusions.inc @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ +# This file contains a list of CVE's where resolution has proven to be impractical +# or there is no reasonable action the Yocto Project can take to resolve the issue. +# It contains all the information we are aware of about an issue and analysis about +# why we believe it can't be fixed/handled. Additional information is welcome through +# patches to the file. +# +# Include this file in your local.conf or distro.conf to exclude these CVE's +# from the cve-check results or add to the bitbake command with: +# -R conf/distro/include/cve-extra-exclusions.inc +# +# The file is not included by default since users should review this data to ensure +# it matches their expectations and usage of the project. +# +# We may also include "in-flight" information about current/ongoing CVE work with +# the aim of sharing that work and ensuring we don't duplicate it. +# + + +# strace https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2000-0006 +# CVE is more than 20 years old with no resolution evident +# broken links in CVE database references make resolution impractical +CVE_CHECK_WHITELIST += "CVE-2000-0006" + +# epiphany https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2005-0238 +# The issue here is spoofing of domain names using characters from other character sets. +# There has been much discussion amongst the epiphany and webkit developers and +# whilst there are improvements about how domains are handled and displayed to the user +# there is unlikely ever to be a single fix to webkit or epiphany which addresses this +# problem. Whitelisted as there isn't any mitigation or fix or way to progress this further +# we can seem to take. +CVE_CHECK_WHITELIST += "CVE-2005-0238" + +# glibc https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2010-4756 +# Issue is memory exhaustion via glob() calls, e.g. from within an ftp server +# Best discussion in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681681 +# Upstream don't see it as a security issue, ftp servers shouldn't be passing +# this to libc glob. Exclude as upstream have no plans to add BSD's GLOB_LIMIT or similar +CVE_CHECK_WHITELIST += "CVE-2010-4756" + +# go https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2020-29509 +# go https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2020-29511 +# The encoding/xml package in go can potentially be used for security exploits if not used correctly +# CVE applies to a netapp product as well as flagging a general issue. We don't ship anything +# exposing this interface in an exploitable way +CVE_CHECK_WHITELIST += "CVE-2020-29509 CVE-2020-29511" + +# db +# Since Oracle relicensed bdb, the open source community is slowly but surely replacing bdb with +# supported and open source friendly alternatives. As a result these CVEs are unlikely to ever be fixed. +CVE_CHECK_WHITELIST += "CVE-2015-2583 CVE-2015-2624 CVE-2015-2626 CVE-2015-2640 CVE-2015-2654 \ +CVE-2015-2656 CVE-2015-4754 CVE-2015-4764 CVE-2015-4774 CVE-2015-4775 CVE-2015-4776 CVE-2015-4777 \ +CVE-2015-4778 CVE-2015-4779 CVE-2015-4780 CVE-2015-4781 CVE-2015-4782 CVE-2015-4783 CVE-2015-4784 \ +CVE-2015-4785 CVE-2015-4786 CVE-2015-4787 CVE-2015-4788 CVE-2015-4789 CVE-2015-4790 CVE-2016-0682 \ +CVE-2016-0689 CVE-2016-0692 CVE-2016-0694 CVE-2016-3418 CVE-2020-2981" + +# qemu:qemu-native:qemu-system-native https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2021-20255 +# There was a proposed patch https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-02/msg06098.html +# qemu maintainers say the patch is incorrect and should not be applied +# Ignore from OE's perspectivee as the issue is of low impact, at worst sitting in an infinite loop rather than exploitable +CVE_CHECK_WHITELIST += "CVE-2021-20255" + +# qemu:qemu-native:qemu-system-native https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2019-12067 +# There was a proposed patch but rejected by upstream qemu. It is unclear if the issue can +# still be reproduced or where exactly any bug is. +# Ignore from OE's perspective as we'll pick up any fix when upstream accepts one. +CVE_CHECK_WHITELIST += "CVE-2019-12067" + +# nasm:nasm-native https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2020-18974 +# It is a fuzzing related buffer overflow. It is of low impact since most devices +# wouldn't expose an assembler. The upstream is inactive and there is little to be +# done about the bug, ignore from an OE perspective. +CVE_CHECK_WHITELIST += "CVE-2020-18974" + + + |