| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
So the original intention of tsk_cpus_allowed() was to 'future-proof'
the field - but it's pretty ineffectual at that, because half of
the code uses ->cpus_allowed directly ...
Also, the wrapper makes the code longer than the original expression!
So just get rid of it. This also shrinks <linux/sched.h> a bit.
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
These 2 exercise independent code paths and need different arguments.
After this change, you call:
cpudl_clear(cp, cpu);
cpudl_set(cp, cpu, dl);
instead of:
cpudl_set(cp, cpu, 0 /* dl */, 0 /* is_valid */);
cpudl_set(cp, cpu, dl, 1 /* is_valid */);
Signed-off-by: Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Reviewed-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-dl@retis.sssup.it
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1471184828-12644-4-git-send-email-tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
This change goes from heapify() ops done by swapping with parent/child
so that the item to fix moves along, to heapify() ops done by just
pulling the parent/child chain by 1 pos, then storing the item to fix
just at the end. On a non-trivial heapify(), this performs roughly half
stores wrt swaps.
This has been measured to achieve up to 10% of speed-up for cpudl_set()
calls, with a randomly generated workload of 1K,10K,100K random heap
insertions and deletions (75% cpudl_set() calls with is_valid=1 and
25% with is_valid=0), and randomly generated cpu IDs, with up to 256
CPUs, as measured on an Intel Core2 Duo.
Signed-off-by: Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Reviewed-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-dl@retis.sssup.it
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1471184828-12644-3-git-send-email-tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
1. heapify up factored out in new dedicated function heapify_up()
(avoids repetition of same code)
2. call to cpudl_change_key() replaced with heapify_up() when
cpudl_set actually inserts a new node in the heap
3. cpudl_change_key() replaced with heapify() that heapifies up
or down as needed.
Signed-off-by: Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Reviewed-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-dl@retis.sssup.it
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1471184828-12644-2-git-send-email-tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Current code in cpudeadline.c has a bug in re-heapifying when adding a
new element at the end of the heap, because a deadline value of 0 is
temporarily set in the new elem, then cpudl_change_key() is called
with the actual elem deadline as param.
However, the function compares the new deadline to set with the one
previously in the elem, which is 0. So, if current absolute deadlines
grew so much to have negative values as s64, the comparison in
cpudl_change_key() makes the wrong decision. Instead, as from
dl_time_before(), the kernel should handle correctly abs deadlines
wrap-arounds.
This patch fixes the problem with a minimally invasive change that
forces cpudl_change_key() to heapify up in this case.
Signed-off-by: Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1468921493-10054-2-git-send-email-tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Use the future-safe accessor for struct task_struct's.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1462969411-17735-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Move dl_time_before() static definition in include/linux/sched/deadline.h
so that it can be used by different parties without being re-defined.
Reported-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1441188096-23021-3-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
cpu_active_mask is rarely changed (only on hotplug), so remove this
operation to gain a little performance.
If there is a change in cpu_active_mask, rq_online_dl() and
rq_offline_dl() should take care of it normally, so cpudl::free_cpus
carries enough information for us.
For the rare case when a task is put onto a dying cpu (which
rq_offline_dl() can't handle in a timely fashion), it will be
handled through _cpu_down()->...->multi_cpu_stop()->migration_call()
->migrate_tasks(), preventing the task from hanging on the
dead cpu.
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
[peterz: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1421642980-10045-2-git-send-email-pang.xunlei@linaro.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently, cpudl::free_cpus contains all CPUs during init, see
cpudl_init(). When calling cpudl_find(), we have to add rd->span
to avoid selecting the cpu outside the current root domain, because
cpus_allowed cannot be depended on when performing clustered
scheduling using the cpuset, see find_later_rq().
This patch adds cpudl_set_freecpu() and cpudl_clear_freecpu() for
changing cpudl::free_cpus when doing rq_online_dl()/rq_offline_dl(),
so we can avoid the rd->span operation when calling cpudl_find()
in find_later_rq().
Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1421642980-10045-1-git-send-email-pang.xunlei@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Users can perform clustered scheduling using the cpuset facility.
After an exclusive cpuset is created, task migrations happen only
between CPUs belonging to the same cpuset. Inter- cpuset migrations
can only happen when the user requires so, moving a task between
different cpusets. This behaviour is broken in SCHED_DEADLINE, as
currently spurious inter- cpuset migration may happen without user
intervention.
This patch fix the problem (and shuffles the code a bit to improve
clarity).
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: raistlin@linux.it
Cc: michael@amarulasolutions.com
Cc: fchecconi@gmail.com
Cc: daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de
Cc: vincent@legout.info
Cc: luca.abeni@unitn.it
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1411118561-26323-4-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Tejun reported that his resume was failing due to order-3 allocations
from sched_domain building.
Replace the NR_CPUS arrays in there with a dynamically allocated
array.
Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-kat4gl1m5a6dwy6nzuqox45e@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Free cpudl->free_cpus allocated in cpudl_init().
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/534F36CE.2000409@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Commit 82b9580 ("sched/deadline: Test for CPU's presence explicitly")
changed how we check if a CPU returned by cpudeadline machinery is
valid. But, we don't want to call cpu_present() if best_cpu is
equal to -1. So, switch the order of tests inside WARN_ON().
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Cc: konrad.wilk@oracle.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1393238832-9100-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
A hot-removed CPU may have ID that is numerically larger than the number of
existing CPUs in the system (e.g. we can unplug CPU 4 from a system that
has CPUs 0, 1 and 4).
Thus the WARN_ONs should check whether the CPU in question is currently
present, not whether its ID value is less than num_present_cpus().
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Reported-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1392646353-1874-1-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
new sparse warnings:
>> kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c:38:6: sparse: symbol 'cpudl_exchange' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c:46:6: sparse: symbol 'cpudl_heapify' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c:71:6: sparse: symbol 'cpudl_change_key' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c:195:15: sparse: memset with byte count of 163928
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Fixes: 6bfd6d72f51c ("sched/deadline: speed up SCHED_DEADLINE pushes with a push-heap")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/52d47f8c.EYJsA5+mELPBk4t6\%fengguang.wu@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Data from tests confirmed that the original active load balancing
logic didn't scale neither in the number of CPU nor in the number of
tasks (as sched_rt does).
Here we provide a global data structure to keep track of deadlines
of the running tasks in the system. The structure is composed by
a bitmask showing the free CPUs and a max-heap, needed when the system
is heavily loaded.
The implementation and concurrent access scheme are kept simple by
design. However, our measurements show that we can compete with sched_rt
on large multi-CPUs machines [1].
Only the push path is addressed, the extension to use this structure
also for pull decisions is straightforward. However, we are currently
evaluating different (in order to decrease/avoid contention) data
structures to solve possibly both problems. We are also going to re-run
tests considering recent changes inside cpupri [2].
[1] http://retis.sssup.it/~jlelli/papers/Ospert11Lelli.pdf
[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rt-users/msg06778.html
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1383831828-15501-14-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
Ingo Molnar
Tommaso Cucinotta
Thomas Gleixner
Juri Lelli
Xunlei Pang
Peter Zijlstra
Li Zefan
Juri Lelli
Boris Ostrovsky
Fengguang Wu