aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/powerpc/lib/locks.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2018-07-30powerpc: clean the inclusion of stringify.hChristophe Leroy
Only include linux/stringify.h is files using __stringify() Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2016-06-14powerpc/spinlock: Fix spin_unlock_wait()Boqun Feng
There is an ordering issue with spin_unlock_wait() on powerpc, because the spin_lock primitive is an ACQUIRE and an ACQUIRE is only ordering the load part of the operation with memory operations following it. Therefore the following event sequence can happen: CPU 1 CPU 2 CPU 3 ================== ==================== ============== spin_unlock(&lock); spin_lock(&lock): r1 = *lock; // r1 == 0; o = object; o = READ_ONCE(object); // reordered here object = NULL; smp_mb(); spin_unlock_wait(&lock); *lock = 1; smp_mb(); o->dead = true; < o = READ_ONCE(object); > // reordered upwards if (o) // true BUG_ON(o->dead); // true!! To fix this, we add a "nop" ll/sc loop in arch_spin_unlock_wait() on ppc, the "nop" ll/sc loop reads the lock value and writes it back atomically, in this way it will synchronize the view of the lock on CPU1 with that on CPU2. Therefore in the scenario above, either CPU2 will fail to get the lock at first or CPU1 will see the lock acquired by CPU2, both cases will eliminate this bug. This is a similar idea as what Will Deacon did for ARM64 in: d86b8da04dfa ("arm64: spinlock: serialise spin_unlock_wait against concurrent lockers") Furthermore, if the "nop" ll/sc figures out the lock is locked, we actually don't need to do the "nop" ll/sc trick again, we can just do a normal load+check loop for the lock to be released, because in that case, spin_unlock_wait() is called when someone is holding the lock, and the store part of the "nop" ll/sc happens before the lock release of the current lock holder: "nop" ll/sc -> spin_unlock() and the lock release happens before the next lock acquisition: spin_unlock() -> spin_lock() <next holder> which means the "nop" ll/sc happens before the next lock acquisition: "nop" ll/sc -> spin_unlock() -> spin_lock() <next holder> With a smp_mb() preceding spin_unlock_wait(), the store of object is guaranteed to be observed by the next lock holder: STORE -> smp_mb() -> "nop" ll/sc -> spin_unlock() -> spin_lock() <next holder> This patch therefore fixes the issue and also cleans the arch_spin_unlock_wait() a little bit by removing superfluous memory barriers in loops and consolidating the implementations for PPC32 and PPC64 into one. Suggested-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Inline the "nop" ll/sc loop and set EH=0, munge change log] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2015-03-25cpufreq/ppc: Add missing #include <asm/smp.h>Geert Uytterhoeven
If CONFIG_SMP=n, <linux/smp.h> does not include <asm/smp.h>, causing: drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c: In function 'corenet_cpufreq_cpu_init': drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c:173:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'get_hard_smp_processor_id' [-Werror=implicit-funcuresh E. Warrier" <warrier@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Patchwork-Id: 443703 Message-Id: <54EE5989.7010800@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:23:53 -0600 Export __spin_yield so that the arch_spin_unlock() function can be invoked from a module. This will be required for modules where we want to take a lock that is also is acquired in hypervisor real mode. Because we want to avoid running any lockdep code (which may not be safe in real mode), this lock needs to be an arch_spinlock_t instead of a normal spinlock. Signed-off-by: Suresh Warrier <warrier@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2014-08-13powerpc: Add smp_mb()s to arch_spin_unlock_wait()Michael Ellerman
Similar to the previous commit which described why we need to add a barrier to arch_spin_is_locked(), we have a similar problem with spin_unlock_wait(). We need a barrier on entry to ensure any spinlock we have previously taken is visibly locked prior to the load of lock->slock. It's also not clear if spin_unlock_wait() is intended to have ACQUIRE semantics. For now be conservative and add a barrier on exit to give it ACQUIRE semantics. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2013-08-14powerpc: Fix little endian lppaca, slb_shadow and dtl_entryAnton Blanchard
The lppaca, slb_shadow and dtl_entry hypervisor structures are big endian, so we have to byte swap them in little endian builds. LE KVM hosts will also need to be fixed but for now add an #error to remind us. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-03-21powerpc: Remove FW_FEATURE ISERIES from arch codeStephen Rothwell
This is no longer selectable, so just remove all the dependent code. Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2011-10-31powerpc: various straight conversions from module.h --> export.hPaul Gortmaker
All these files were including module.h just for the basic EXPORT_SYMBOL infrastructure. We can shift them off to the export.h header which is a way smaller footprint and thus realize some compile time gains. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2010-09-02powerpc: Abstract indexing of lppaca structsPaul Mackerras
Currently we have the lppaca structs as a simple array of NR_CPUS entries, taking up space in the data section of the kernel image. In future we would like to allocate them dynamically, so this abstracts out the accesses to the array, making it easier to change how we locate the lppaca for a given cpu in future. Specifically, lppaca[cpu] changes to lppaca_of(cpu). Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2009-12-14locking: Convert raw_rwlock to arch_rwlockThomas Gleixner
Not strictly necessary for -rt as -rt does not have non sleeping rwlocks, but it's odd to not have a consistent naming convention. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
2009-12-14locking: Convert __raw_spin* functions to arch_spin*Thomas Gleixner
Name space cleanup. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
2009-12-14locking: Convert raw_spinlock to arch_spinlockThomas Gleixner
The raw_spin* namespace was taken by lockdep for the architecture specific implementations. raw_spin_* would be the ideal name space for the spinlocks which are not converted to sleeping locks in preempt-rt. Linus suggested to convert the raw_ to arch_ locks and cleanup the name space instead of using an artifical name like core_spin, atomic_spin or whatever No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
2007-03-09[POWERPC] Make ppc64_defconfig without CONFIG_PPC_PSERIES buildStephen Rothwell
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2006-09-20[POWERPC] make spinlocks work in a combined kernelStephen Rothwell
If we build a pSeries/iSeries combined kernel, we will need this. Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
2006-06-30Remove obsolete #include <linux/config.h>Jörn Engel
Signed-off-by: Jörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
2006-01-13[PATCH] powerpc: Remove lppaca structure from the PACADavid Gibson
At present the lppaca - the structure shared with the iSeries hypervisor and phyp - is contained within the PACA, our own low-level per-cpu structure. This doesn't have to be so, the patch below removes it, making a separate array of lppaca structures. This saves approximately 500*NR_CPUS bytes of image size and kernel memory, because we don't need aligning gap between the Linux and hypervisor portions of every PACA. On the other hand it means an extra level of dereference in many accesses to the lppaca. The patch also gets rid of several places where we assign the paca address to a local variable for no particular reason. Signed-off-by: David Gibson <dwg@au1.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2005-11-07powerpc: Various UP build fixesPaul Mackerras
Mostly this involves adding #include <asm/smp.h>, since that defines things like boot_cpuid[_phys] and [gs]et_hard_smp_processor_id, which are SMP-related but still needed on UP. This incorporates fixes posted by Olof Johansson and Heikki Lindholm. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2005-11-01merge filename and modify references to iseries/hv_call.hKelly Daly
Signed-off-by: Kelly Daly <kelly@au.ibm.com>
2005-10-31powerpc: apply recent changes to merged codePaul Mackerras
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2005-10-10powerpc: Get 64-bit configs to compile with ARCH=powerpcPaul Mackerras
This is a bunch of mostly small fixes that are needed to get ARCH=powerpc to compile for 64-bit. This adds setup_64.c from arch/ppc64/kernel/setup.c and locks.c from arch/ppc64/lib/locks.c. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>