| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
* pm-docs:
PM: docs: Delete the obsolete states.txt document
PM: docs: Describe high-level PM strategies and sleep states
|
|
* intel_pstate:
cpufreq: intel_pstate: Shorten a couple of long names
cpufreq: intel_pstate: Simplify intel_pstate_adjust_pstate()
cpufreq: intel_pstate: Improve IO performance with per-core P-states
cpufreq: intel_pstate: Drop INTEL_PSTATE_HWP_SAMPLING_INTERVAL
cpufreq: intel_pstate: Drop ->update_util from pstate_funcs
cpufreq: intel_pstate: Do not use PID-based P-state selection
|
|
* pm-cpufreq: (33 commits)
cpufreq: imx6q: Fix imx6sx low frequency support
cpufreq: speedstep-lib: make several arrays static, makes code smaller
cpufreq: ti: Fix 'of_node_put' being called twice in error handling path
cpufreq: dt-platdev: Drop few entries from whitelist
cpufreq: dt-platdev: Automatically create cpufreq device with OPP v2
ARM: ux500: don't select CPUFREQ_DT
cpufreq: Convert to using %pOF instead of full_name
cpufreq: Cap the default transition delay value to 10 ms
cpufreq: dbx500: Delete obsolete driver
mfd: db8500-prcmu: Get rid of cpufreq dependency
cpufreq: enable the DT cpufreq driver on the Ux500
cpufreq: Loongson2: constify platform_device_id
cpufreq: dt: Add r8a7796 support to to use generic cpufreq driver
cpufreq: remove setting of policy->cpu in policy->cpus during init
cpufreq: mediatek: add support of cpufreq to MT7622 SoC
cpufreq: mediatek: add cleanups with the more generic naming
cpufreq: rcar: Add support for R8A7795 SoC
cpufreq: dt: Add rk3328 compatible to use generic cpufreq driver
cpufreq: s5pv210: add missing of_node_put()
cpufreq: Allow dynamic switching with CPUFREQ_ETERNAL latency
...
|
|
Reorganize the power management part of admin-guide by adding a
description of major power management strategies supported by the
kernel (system-wide and working-state power management) to it and
dividing the rest of the material into the system-wide PM and
working-state PM chapters.
On top of that, add a description of system sleep states to the
system-wide PM chapter.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
|
|
|
|
Add a description of the cpuinfo_cur_freq policy attribute in sysfs
to the cpufreq documentation under Documentation/admin-guide/pm/ as
it is missing after commit 2a0e49279850 (cpufreq: User/admin
documentation update and consolidation) that overlooked it.
Fixes: 2a0e49279850 (cpufreq: User/admin documentation update and consolidation)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
|
|
All systems with a defined ACPI preferred profile that are not
"servers" have been using the load-based P-state selection algorithm
in intel_pstate since 4.12-rc1 (mobile systems and laptops have been
using it since 4.10-rc1) and no problems with it have been reported
to date. In particular, no regressions with respect to the PID-based
P-state selection have been reported. Also testing indicates that
the P-state selection algorithm based on CPU load is generally on par
with the PID-based algorithm performance-wise, and for some workloads
it turns out to be better than the other one, while being more
straightforward and easier to understand at the same time.
Moreover, the PID-based P-state selection algorithm in intel_pstate
is known to be unstable in some situation and generally problematic,
the issues with it are hard to address and it has become a
significant maintenance burden.
For these reasons, make intel_pstate use the "powersave" P-state
selection algorithm based on CPU load in the active mode on all
systems and drop the PID-based P-state selection code along with
all things related to it from the driver. Also update the
documentation accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
The cpufreq core and governors aren't supposed to set a limit on how
fast we want to try changing the frequency. This is currently done for
the legacy governors with help of min_sampling_rate.
At worst, we may end up setting the sampling rate to a value lower than
the rate at which frequency can be changed and then one of the CPUs in
the policy will be only changing frequency for ever.
But that is something for the user to decide and there is no need to
have special handling for such cases in the core. Leave it for the user
to figure out.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Commit f8475cef9008 "x86: use common aperfmperf_khz_on_cpu() to
calculate KHz using APERF/MPERF" modified the way the scaling_cur_freq
cpufreq policy attribute in sysfs is handled on contemporary
Intel-based x86 systems, so update the documentation to reflect
that change.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
After commit 82b4e03e01bc (intel_pstate: skip scheduler hook when in
"performance" mode) get_target_pstate_use_performance() and
get_target_pstate_use_cpu_load() are never called if scaling_governor
is "performance", so drop the CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE checks from
them as they will never trigger anyway.
Moreover, the documentation needs to be updated to reflect the change
made by the above commit, so do that too.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Add a document describing the current behavior and user space
interface of the intel_pstate driver in the RST format and
drop the existing outdated intel_pstate.txt document.
Also update admin-guide/pm/cpufreq.rst with proper RST references
to the new intel_pstate.rst document.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
The user/admin documentation of cpufreq is badly outdated. It
conains stale and/or inaccurate information along with things
that are not particularly useful. Also, some of the important
pieces are missing from it.
For this reason, add a new user/admin document for cpufreq
containing current information to admin-guide and drop the old
outdated .txt documents it is replacing.
Since there will be more PM documents in admin-guide going forward,
create a separate directory for them and put the cpufreq document
in there right away.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
|
Rafael J. Wysocki
Viresh Kumar
Rafael J. Wysocki