1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
|
From a7c57bb9edacc420cc99d16852621a12d112cb0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:47:51 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Fix execve behavior apparmor for PR_{GET,SET}_NO_NEW_PRIVS
commit c29bceb3967398cf2ac8bf8edf9634fdb722df7d upstream.
Add support for AppArmor to explicitly fail requested domain transitions
if NO_NEW_PRIVS is set and the task is not unconfined.
Transitions from unconfined are still allowed because this always results
in a reduction of privileges.
Acked-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
v18: new acked-by, new description
Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
---
security/apparmor/domain.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/apparmor/domain.c b/security/apparmor/domain.c
index 18c88d0..b81ea10 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/domain.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/domain.c
@@ -360,10 +360,6 @@ int apparmor_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
if (bprm->cred_prepared)
return 0;
- /* XXX: no_new_privs is not usable with AppArmor yet */
- if (bprm->unsafe & LSM_UNSAFE_NO_NEW_PRIVS)
- return -EPERM;
-
cxt = bprm->cred->security;
BUG_ON(!cxt);
@@ -398,6 +394,11 @@ int apparmor_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
new_profile = find_attach(ns, &ns->base.profiles, name);
if (!new_profile)
goto cleanup;
+ /*
+ * NOTE: Domain transitions from unconfined are allowed
+ * even when no_new_privs is set because this aways results
+ * in a further reduction of permissions.
+ */
goto apply;
}
@@ -459,6 +460,16 @@ int apparmor_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
/* fail exec */
error = -EACCES;
+ /*
+ * Policy has specified a domain transition, if no_new_privs then
+ * fail the exec.
+ */
+ if (bprm->unsafe & LSM_UNSAFE_NO_NEW_PRIVS) {
+ aa_put_profile(new_profile);
+ error = -EPERM;
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+
if (!new_profile)
goto audit;
@@ -613,6 +624,14 @@ int aa_change_hat(const char *hats[], int count, u64 token, bool permtest)
const char *target = NULL, *info = NULL;
int error = 0;
+ /*
+ * Fail explicitly requested domain transitions if no_new_privs.
+ * There is no exception for unconfined as change_hat is not
+ * available.
+ */
+ if (current->no_new_privs)
+ return -EPERM;
+
/* released below */
cred = get_current_cred();
cxt = cred->security;
@@ -754,6 +773,18 @@ int aa_change_profile(const char *ns_name, const char *hname, bool onexec,
cxt = cred->security;
profile = aa_cred_profile(cred);
+ /*
+ * Fail explicitly requested domain transitions if no_new_privs
+ * and not unconfined.
+ * Domain transitions from unconfined are allowed even when
+ * no_new_privs is set because this aways results in a reduction
+ * of permissions.
+ */
+ if (current->no_new_privs && !unconfined(profile)) {
+ put_cred(cred);
+ return -EPERM;
+ }
+
if (ns_name) {
/* released below */
ns = aa_find_namespace(profile->ns, ns_name);
--
1.7.9.1
|
