aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/meta-amd-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.14.71/0417-drm-amd-display-single-channel-bandwidth-verses-dual.patch
blob: 99212994ac890cd16713862852eb6d64b151158d (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
From b6b9f092acc5a479377b28999784a13b417a6408 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charlene Liu <charlene.liu@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 17:46:57 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 0417/4131] drm/amd/display: single channel bandwidth verses
 dual channel bandwidth

DPM0, FCLK=MCLK, single channel bandwidth = dual channel bandwidth
for the rest of the DPM levels, single channel bandwidth = 1/2  dual channel bandwidth

Signed-off-by: Charlene Liu <charlene.liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmytro Laktyushkin <Dmytro.Laktyushkin@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/calcs/dcn_calcs.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/calcs/dcn_calcs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/calcs/dcn_calcs.c
index 26587bc..6d8bc6c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/calcs/dcn_calcs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/calcs/dcn_calcs.c
@@ -920,6 +920,10 @@ bool dcn_validate_bandwidth(
 		calc_wm_sets_and_perf_params(context, v);
 		context->bw.dcn.calc_clk.fclk_khz = (int)(bw_consumed * 1000000 /
 				(ddr4_dram_factor_single_Channel * v->number_of_channels));
+		if (bw_consumed == v->fabric_and_dram_bandwidth_vmin0p65) {
+			context->bw.dcn.calc_clk.fclk_khz = (int)(bw_consumed * 1000000 / 32);
+		}
+
 		context->bw.dcn.calc_clk.dram_ccm_us = (int)(v->dram_clock_change_margin);
 		context->bw.dcn.calc_clk.min_active_dram_ccm_us = (int)(v->min_active_dram_clock_change_margin);
 		context->bw.dcn.calc_clk.dcfclk_deep_sleep_khz = (int)(v->dcf_clk_deep_sleep * 1000);
@@ -1178,8 +1182,7 @@ void dcn_bw_update_from_pplib(struct core_dc *dc)
 			ctx, DM_PP_CLOCK_TYPE_FCLK, &clks) &&
 			clks.num_levels != 0) {
 		ASSERT(clks.num_levels >= 3);
-		dc->dcn_soc.fabric_and_dram_bandwidth_vmin0p65 = dc->dcn_soc.number_of_channels *
-			(clks.data[0].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0) * ddr4_dram_factor_single_Channel / 1000.0;
+		dc->dcn_soc.fabric_and_dram_bandwidth_vmin0p65 = 32 * (clks.data[0].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0) / 1000.0;
 		if (clks.num_levels > 2) {
 			dc->dcn_soc.fabric_and_dram_bandwidth_vmid0p72 = dc->dcn_soc.number_of_channels *
 					(clks.data[clks.num_levels - 3].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0) * ddr4_dram_factor_single_Channel / 1000.0;
@@ -1240,7 +1243,7 @@ void dcn_bw_notify_pplib_of_wm_ranges(struct core_dc *dc)
 	kernel_fpu_begin();
 	max_fclk_khz = dc->dcn_soc.fabric_and_dram_bandwidth_vmax0p9 * 1000000 / factor;
 	nom_fclk_khz = dc->dcn_soc.fabric_and_dram_bandwidth_vnom0p8 * 1000000 / factor;
-	min_fclk_khz = dc->dcn_soc.fabric_and_dram_bandwidth_vmin0p65 * 1000000 / factor;
+	min_fclk_khz = dc->dcn_soc.fabric_and_dram_bandwidth_vmin0p65 * 1000000 / 32;
 	max_dcfclk_khz = dc->dcn_soc.dcfclkv_max0p9 * 1000;
 	nom_dcfclk_khz = dc->dcn_soc.dcfclkv_nom0p8 * 1000;
 	min_dcfclk_khz = dc->dcn_soc.dcfclkv_min0p65 * 1000;
-- 
2.7.4